Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 2, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Las Vegas Aces at Los Angeles Sparks

LVA 79 – LAS 69

June 2, 2026 · Final

Coach Sarah Watanabe

Best model for this game

Coach Sarah Watanabe
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for LVA at LAS

All 12 models’ predicted scores

LVA — one dot per model LAS — one dot per model Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69
Vince Chambers Tol Warning
LVA 84.3–89.3 LAS 81.6–85.8 Overlap 1.53 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 84.7–88.9 LAS 81.9–85.6 Overlap 0.94 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.0–88.6 LAS 82.2–85.4 Overlap 0.44 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.2–88.4 LAS 82.4–85.3 Overlap 0.09 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.3–88.3 LAS 82.4–85.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
19.84
p-value
2.54e-46

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
LVA 84.1–89.9 LAS 81.1–86.2 Overlap 2.09 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 84.5–89.4 LAS 81.5–85.8 Overlap 1.22 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 84.8–89.1 LAS 81.8–85.5 Overlap 0.66 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.1–88.9 LAS 82.0–85.3 Overlap 0.22 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.3–88.7 LAS 82.2–85.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
18.23
p-value
1.04e-41

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
LVA 84.3–88.8 LAS 81.0–86.2 Overlap 1.87 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 84.7–88.4 LAS 81.4–85.8 Overlap 1.09 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 84.9–88.2 LAS 81.7–85.5 Overlap 0.58 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.1–88.0 LAS 81.9–85.3 Overlap 0.19 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.2–87.9 LAS 82.0–85.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
18.26
p-value
8.65e-42

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
LVA 84.6–88.6 LAS 81.6–85.8 Overlap 1.26 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.7) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 84.9–88.2 LAS 81.9–85.5 Overlap 0.6 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.7) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.1–88.0 LAS 82.2–85.3 Overlap 0.17 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.7) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.3–87.9 LAS 82.3–85.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.7) — by 2.8 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.4–87.7 LAS 82.5–85.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.7) — by 2.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
20.64
p-value
2.46e-48

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
LVA 83.8–88.1 LAS 81.0–85.3 Overlap 1.47 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 84.1–87.8 LAS 81.3–84.9 Overlap 0.78 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 84.4–87.6 LAS 81.6–84.7 Overlap 0.33 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 84.6–87.4 LAS 81.7–84.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 2.8 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 84.7–87.2 LAS 81.9–84.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 2.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
19.62
p-value
9.73e-46

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice Tol Warning
LVA 85.0–88.1 LAS 81.4–85.8 Overlap 0.76 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.2–88.0 LAS 81.7–85.4 Overlap 0.27 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.2–87.9 LAS 81.9–85.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.3–87.9 LAS 82.1–85.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.5–87.7 LAS 82.3–84.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
22.14
p-value
4.48e-52

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
LVA 84.3–88.9 LAS 81.3–86.0 Overlap 1.73 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.7) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 84.7–88.6 LAS 81.7–85.7 Overlap 0.98 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.7) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 84.9–88.3 LAS 81.9–85.4 Overlap 0.48 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.7) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.1–88.1 LAS 82.1–85.2 Overlap 0.11 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.7) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.3–88.0 LAS 82.3–85.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.7) — by 3.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
18.80
p-value
1.46e-43

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
LVA 84.9–88.6 LAS 81.2–85.9 Overlap 0.98 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.2–88.3 LAS 81.5–85.5 Overlap 0.31 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.4–88.1 LAS 81.8–85.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.6–88.0 LAS 82.0–85.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.7–87.8 LAS 82.1–84.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
22.65
p-value
5.00e-52

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
LVA 84.3–89.2 LAS 81.1–85.7 Overlap 1.43 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.4) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 84.7–88.8 LAS 81.5–85.4 Overlap 0.66 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.4) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 84.9–88.5 LAS 81.7–85.1 Overlap 0.16 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.4) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.1–88.3 LAS 81.9–84.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.4) — by 3.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.3–88.2 LAS 82.1–84.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.4) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
20.85
p-value
7.18e-49

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
LVA 84.7–88.6 LAS 81.2–86.0 Overlap 1.28 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.0–88.3 LAS 81.6–85.6 Overlap 0.58 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.2–88.1 LAS 81.8–85.3 Overlap 0.13 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.4–87.9 LAS 82.0–85.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.5–87.8 LAS 82.2–85.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
20.88
p-value
3.21e-48

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
LVA 84.6–88.9 LAS 81.2–86.0 Overlap 1.41 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 84.9–88.6 LAS 81.6–85.6 Overlap 0.67 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.2–88.4 LAS 81.8–85.4 Overlap 0.19 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.3–88.2 LAS 82.0–85.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.5–88.0 LAS 82.2–85.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
20.60
p-value
4.43e-48

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
LVA 84.4–89.7 LAS 80.0–86.0 Overlap 1.56 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.0) — by 4.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 84.9–89.3 LAS 80.4–85.5 Overlap 0.65 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.0) — by 4.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.1–89.0 LAS 80.8–85.2 Overlap 0.06 pts Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.0) — by 4.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.3–88.8 LAS 81.0–84.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.0) — by 4.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.5–88.6 LAS 81.2–84.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.0) — by 4.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
21.51
p-value
2.89e-50

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — LVA at LAS — Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69
Level LVA range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.3–89.3 81.6–85.8 1.53 pts Yes No
90% 84.7–88.9 81.9–85.6 0.94 pts Yes No
85% 85.0–88.6 82.2–85.4 0.44 pts Yes No
80% 85.2–88.4 82.4–85.3 0.09 pts Yes No
75% 85.3–88.3 82.4–85.1 — pts Yes No
Reg — LVA at LAS — Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69
Level LVA range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.1–89.9 81.1–86.2 2.09 pts — No
90% 84.5–89.4 81.5–85.8 1.22 pts — No
85% 84.8–89.1 81.8–85.5 0.66 pts — No
80% 85.1–88.9 82.0–85.3 0.22 pts — No
75% 85.3–88.7 82.2–85.1 — pts — No
Dr. Wallace — LVA at LAS — Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69
Level LVA range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.3–88.8 81.0–86.2 1.87 pts — No
90% 84.7–88.4 81.4–85.8 1.09 pts — No
85% 84.9–88.2 81.7–85.5 0.58 pts — No
80% 85.1–88.0 81.9–85.3 0.19 pts — No
75% 85.2–87.9 82.0–85.1 — pts — No
Kevin — LVA at LAS — Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69
Level LVA range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–88.6 81.6–85.8 1.26 pts — No
90% 84.9–88.2 81.9–85.5 0.6 pts — No
85% 85.1–88.0 82.2–85.3 0.17 pts — No
80% 85.3–87.9 82.3–85.1 — pts — No
75% 85.4–87.7 82.5–85.0 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — LVA at LAS — Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69
Level LVA range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.8–88.1 81.0–85.3 1.47 pts — No
90% 84.1–87.8 81.3–84.9 0.78 pts — No
85% 84.4–87.6 81.6–84.7 0.33 pts — No
80% 84.6–87.4 81.7–84.5 — pts — No
75% 84.7–87.2 81.9–84.4 — pts — No
Ice — LVA at LAS — Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69
Level LVA range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.0–88.1 81.4–85.8 0.76 pts Yes No
90% 85.2–88.0 81.7–85.4 0.27 pts Yes No
85% 85.2–87.9 81.9–85.2 — pts Yes No
80% 85.3–87.9 82.1–85.0 — pts Yes No
75% 85.5–87.7 82.3–84.9 — pts Yes No
Jamal — LVA at LAS — Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69
Level LVA range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.3–88.9 81.3–86.0 1.73 pts — No
90% 84.7–88.6 81.7–85.7 0.98 pts — No
85% 84.9–88.3 81.9–85.4 0.48 pts — No
80% 85.1–88.1 82.1–85.2 0.11 pts — No
75% 85.3–88.0 82.3–85.1 — pts — No
Jordan — LVA at LAS — Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69
Level LVA range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.9–88.6 81.2–85.9 0.98 pts — No
90% 85.2–88.3 81.5–85.5 0.31 pts — No
85% 85.4–88.1 81.8–85.3 — pts — No
80% 85.6–88.0 82.0–85.1 — pts — No
75% 85.7–87.8 82.1–84.9 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — LVA at LAS — Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69
Level LVA range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.3–89.2 81.1–85.7 1.43 pts — No
90% 84.7–88.8 81.5–85.4 0.66 pts — No
85% 84.9–88.5 81.7–85.1 0.16 pts — No
80% 85.1–88.3 81.9–84.9 — pts — No
75% 85.3–88.2 82.1–84.8 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — LVA at LAS — Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69
Level LVA range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.7–88.6 81.2–86.0 1.28 pts — No
90% 85.0–88.3 81.6–85.6 0.58 pts — No
85% 85.2–88.1 81.8–85.3 0.13 pts — No
80% 85.4–87.9 82.0–85.2 — pts — No
75% 85.5–87.8 82.2–85.0 — pts — No
Lexi — LVA at LAS — Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69
Level LVA range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–88.9 81.2–86.0 1.41 pts — No
90% 84.9–88.6 81.6–85.6 0.67 pts — No
85% 85.2–88.4 81.8–85.4 0.19 pts — No
80% 85.3–88.2 82.0–85.2 — pts — No
75% 85.5–88.0 82.2–85.0 — pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — LVA at LAS — Actual: LVA 79, LAS 69
Level LVA range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.4–89.7 80.0–86.0 1.56 pts — No
90% 84.9–89.3 80.4–85.5 0.65 pts — No
85% 85.1–89.0 80.8–85.2 0.06 pts — No
80% 85.3–88.8 81.0–84.9 — pts — No
75% 85.5–88.6 81.2–84.7 — pts — No