Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 3, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Phoenix Mercury at Seattle Storm

PHX 72 – SEA 68

June 3, 2026 · Final

Coach Sarah Watanabe

Best model for this game

Coach Sarah Watanabe
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for PHX at SEA

All 12 models’ predicted scores

PHX — one dot per model SEA — one dot per model Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68
Vince Chambers
PHX 82.8–86.7 SEA 79.0–84.2 Overlap 1.43 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 83.1–86.4 SEA 79.4–83.8 Overlap 0.7 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.3–86.2 SEA 79.7–83.6 Overlap 0.23 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.5–86.0 SEA 79.9–83.3 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

PHX 83.6–85.9 SEA 80.1–83.2 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
20.15
p-value
1.60e-45

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
PHX 82.3–87.5 SEA 79.5–84.1 Overlap 1.71 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.8–87.1 SEA 79.9–83.7 Overlap 0.93 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.0–86.8 SEA 80.1–83.5 Overlap 0.43 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.2–86.6 SEA 80.3–83.3 Overlap 0.04 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.4–86.4 SEA 80.5–83.1 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
19.20
p-value
2.40e-44

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
PHX 82.3–87.3 SEA 79.5–84.0 Overlap 1.74 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.7–86.9 SEA 79.8–83.7 Overlap 0.97 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.0–86.7 SEA 80.1–83.4 Overlap 0.46 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.2–86.5 SEA 80.3–83.3 Overlap 0.08 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.3–86.3 SEA 80.4–83.1 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
18.99
p-value
6.03e-44

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
PHX 82.4–87.3 SEA 79.4–83.8 Overlap 1.41 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.8–86.9 SEA 79.8–83.4 Overlap 0.67 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.0–86.6 SEA 80.0–83.2 Overlap 0.18 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.2–86.4 SEA 80.2–83.0 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

PHX 83.4–86.3 SEA 80.3–82.9 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
20.67
p-value
3.73e-48

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
PHX 81.2–85.8 SEA 79.4–83.2 Overlap 1.99 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.6–85.4 SEA 79.7–82.9 Overlap 1.32 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.8–85.2 SEA 79.9–82.7 Overlap 0.88 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.0–85.0 SEA 80.1–82.6 Overlap 0.55 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.2–84.8 SEA 80.2–82.4 Overlap 0.27 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
15.48
p-value
4.80e-34

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
PHX 82.7–86.9 SEA 79.6–84.2 Overlap 1.54 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.9) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 83.0–86.6 SEA 80.0–83.9 Overlap 0.83 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.9) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.3–86.4 SEA 80.3–83.6 Overlap 0.37 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.9) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.4–86.2 SEA 80.4–83.4 Overlap 0.01 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.9) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.6–86.1 SEA 80.6–83.3 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.9) — by 2.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
19.39
p-value
4.62e-45

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
PHX 82.6–87.0 SEA 79.7–83.6 Overlap 1.01 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.7) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 83.0–86.6 SEA 80.0–83.3 Overlap 0.35 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.7) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.2–86.4 SEA 80.2–83.1 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.7) — by 3.1 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

PHX 83.4–86.2 SEA 80.4–82.9 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.7) — by 3.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

PHX 83.5–86.1 SEA 80.5–82.8 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.7) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
22.45
p-value
1.00e-52

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
PHX 82.6–86.9 SEA 79.5–84.4 Overlap 1.77 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.9) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.9–86.5 SEA 79.9–84.0 Overlap 1.03 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.9) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 83.2–86.3 SEA 80.1–83.7 Overlap 0.55 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.9) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.3–86.1 SEA 80.3–83.5 Overlap 0.18 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.9) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.5–86.0 SEA 80.5–83.4 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.9) — by 2.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
18.26
p-value
7.91e-42

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin Tol Warning
PHX 83.1–86.6 SEA 79.5–83.8 Overlap 0.71 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.2–86.4 SEA 79.8–83.5 Overlap 0.22 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.4–86.3 SEA 80.1–83.2 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

PHX 83.5–86.2 SEA 80.2–83.1 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

PHX 83.5–86.1 SEA 80.4–82.9 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.6) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
21.02
p-value
2.60e-49

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
PHX 82.4–87.1 SEA 79.9–83.8 Overlap 1.42 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.8–86.7 SEA 80.2–83.5 Overlap 0.72 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.0–86.5 SEA 80.4–83.3 Overlap 0.27 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.2–86.3 SEA 80.5–83.1 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 2.9 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

PHX 83.3–86.1 SEA 80.7–83.0 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.8) — by 2.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
19.94
p-value
5.48e-46

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
PHX 82.5–87.0 SEA 79.6–84.3 Overlap 1.84 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 82.0) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.8–86.7 SEA 80.0–83.9 Overlap 1.1 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 82.0) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 83.1–86.4 SEA 80.2–83.7 Overlap 0.61 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 82.0) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.3–86.2 SEA 80.4–83.5 Overlap 0.24 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 82.0) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.4–86.1 SEA 80.6–83.3 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 82.0) — by 2.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
17.93
p-value
3.26e-41

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
PHX 81.7–87.2 SEA 79.0–83.1 Overlap 1.41 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.1) — by 3.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.2–86.8 SEA 79.4–82.8 Overlap 0.64 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.1) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.4–86.5 SEA 79.6–82.6 Overlap 0.14 pts Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.1) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.7–86.3 SEA 79.7–82.4 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.1) — by 3.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

PHX 82.9–86.1 SEA 79.9–82.3 No overlap Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 81.1) — by 3.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
20.81
p-value
2.96e-47

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — PHX at SEA — Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68
Level PHX range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.8–86.7 79.0–84.2 1.43 pts — No
90% 83.1–86.4 79.4–83.8 0.7 pts — No
85% 83.3–86.2 79.7–83.6 0.23 pts — No
80% 83.5–86.0 79.9–83.3 — pts — No
75% 83.6–85.9 80.1–83.2 — pts — No
Reg — PHX at SEA — Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68
Level PHX range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.3–87.5 79.5–84.1 1.71 pts — No
90% 82.8–87.1 79.9–83.7 0.93 pts — No
85% 83.0–86.8 80.1–83.5 0.43 pts — No
80% 83.2–86.6 80.3–83.3 0.04 pts — No
75% 83.4–86.4 80.5–83.1 — pts — No
Dr. Wallace — PHX at SEA — Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68
Level PHX range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.3–87.3 79.5–84.0 1.74 pts — No
90% 82.7–86.9 79.8–83.7 0.97 pts — No
85% 83.0–86.7 80.1–83.4 0.46 pts — No
80% 83.2–86.5 80.3–83.3 0.08 pts — No
75% 83.3–86.3 80.4–83.1 — pts — No
Kevin — PHX at SEA — Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68
Level PHX range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.4–87.3 79.4–83.8 1.41 pts — No
90% 82.8–86.9 79.8–83.4 0.67 pts — No
85% 83.0–86.6 80.0–83.2 0.18 pts — No
80% 83.2–86.4 80.2–83.0 — pts — No
75% 83.4–86.3 80.3–82.9 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — PHX at SEA — Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68
Level PHX range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.2–85.8 79.4–83.2 1.99 pts — No
90% 81.6–85.4 79.7–82.9 1.32 pts — No
85% 81.8–85.2 79.9–82.7 0.88 pts — No
80% 82.0–85.0 80.1–82.6 0.55 pts — No
75% 82.2–84.8 80.2–82.4 0.27 pts — No
Ice — PHX at SEA — Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68
Level PHX range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.7–86.9 79.6–84.2 1.54 pts — No
90% 83.0–86.6 80.0–83.9 0.83 pts — No
85% 83.3–86.4 80.3–83.6 0.37 pts — No
80% 83.4–86.2 80.4–83.4 0.01 pts — No
75% 83.6–86.1 80.6–83.3 — pts — No
Jamal — PHX at SEA — Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68
Level PHX range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.6–87.0 79.7–83.6 1.01 pts — No
90% 83.0–86.6 80.0–83.3 0.35 pts — No
85% 83.2–86.4 80.2–83.1 — pts — No
80% 83.4–86.2 80.4–82.9 — pts — No
75% 83.5–86.1 80.5–82.8 — pts — No
Jordan — PHX at SEA — Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68
Level PHX range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.6–86.9 79.5–84.4 1.77 pts — No
90% 82.9–86.5 79.9–84.0 1.03 pts — No
85% 83.2–86.3 80.1–83.7 0.55 pts — No
80% 83.3–86.1 80.3–83.5 0.18 pts — No
75% 83.5–86.0 80.5–83.4 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — PHX at SEA — Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68
Level PHX range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.1–86.6 79.5–83.8 0.71 pts Yes No
90% 83.2–86.4 79.8–83.5 0.22 pts Yes No
85% 83.4–86.3 80.1–83.2 — pts Yes No
80% 83.5–86.2 80.2–83.1 — pts Yes No
75% 83.5–86.1 80.4–82.9 — pts Yes No
Maya Jefferson — PHX at SEA — Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68
Level PHX range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.4–87.1 79.9–83.8 1.42 pts — No
90% 82.8–86.7 80.2–83.5 0.72 pts — No
85% 83.0–86.5 80.4–83.3 0.27 pts — No
80% 83.2–86.3 80.5–83.1 — pts — No
75% 83.3–86.1 80.7–83.0 — pts — No
Lexi — PHX at SEA — Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68
Level PHX range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.5–87.0 79.6–84.3 1.84 pts — No
90% 82.8–86.7 80.0–83.9 1.1 pts — No
85% 83.1–86.4 80.2–83.7 0.61 pts — No
80% 83.3–86.2 80.4–83.5 0.24 pts — No
75% 83.4–86.1 80.6–83.3 — pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — PHX at SEA — Actual: PHX 72, SEA 68
Level PHX range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.7–87.2 79.0–83.1 1.41 pts — No
90% 82.2–86.8 79.4–82.8 0.64 pts — No
85% 82.4–86.5 79.6–82.6 0.14 pts — No
80% 82.7–86.3 79.7–82.4 — pts — No
75% 82.9–86.1 79.9–82.3 — pts — No