Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 6, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Golden State Valkyries at Las Vegas Aces

GS 79 – LVA 84

June 6, 2026 · Final

Coach Sarah Watanabe

Best model for this game

Coach Sarah Watanabe
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for GS at LVA

All 12 models’ predicted scores

GS — one dot per model LVA — one dot per model Actual: GS 79, LVA 84
Vince Chambers
GS 79.3–84.3 LVA 84.7–89.6 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 5.4 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.7–83.9 LVA 85.1–89.2 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 5.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.0–83.7 LVA 85.4–89.0 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 5.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.2–83.5 LVA 85.6–88.8 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 5.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.4–83.3 LVA 85.8–88.6 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 5.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
-31.90
p-value
3.66e-73

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
GS 79.1–84.4 LVA 84.7–90.0 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.5–83.9 LVA 85.1–89.6 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.8–83.7 LVA 85.4–89.3 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.0–83.5 LVA 85.6–89.1 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.2–83.3 LVA 85.8–88.9 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
-31.40
p-value
3.47e-72

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
GS 79.3–84.4 LVA 84.6–89.6 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.9) — by 5.3 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.7–84.0 LVA 85.0–89.2 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.9) — by 5.3 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.0–83.7 LVA 85.3–88.9 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.9) — by 5.3 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.2–83.5 LVA 85.5–88.7 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.9) — by 5.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.4–83.3 LVA 85.7–88.6 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.9) — by 5.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
-30.89
p-value
3.87e-71

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
GS 79.4–84.0 LVA 85.0–89.5 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.8–83.6 LVA 85.4–89.2 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.0–83.4 LVA 85.6–88.9 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.2–83.2 LVA 85.8–88.7 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.3–83.1 LVA 85.9–88.6 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
-36.04
p-value
6.25e-81

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah Tol Warning
GS 79.4–83.4 LVA 84.2–88.7 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.0) — by 5.4 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.4–83.1 LVA 84.5–88.3 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.0) — by 5.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.6–82.9 LVA 84.8–88.1 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.0) — by 5.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.7–82.7 LVA 85.0–87.9 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.0) — by 5.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.8–82.5 LVA 85.1–87.7 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.0) — by 5.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
-34.21
p-value
2.63e-77

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
GS 78.4–84.9 LVA 84.7–89.8 Overlap 0.21 pts Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

GS 78.9–84.4 LVA 85.1–89.4 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.3–84.1 LVA 85.4–89.1 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.5–83.8 LVA 85.6–88.9 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.8–83.6 LVA 85.8–88.7 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
-28.17
p-value
1.73e-63

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal Tol Warning
GS 78.3–84.6 LVA 84.3–89.3 Overlap 0.24 pts Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.4) — by 5.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

GS 78.8–84.1 LVA 85.4–89.0 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.4) — by 5.6 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.1–83.7 LVA 85.5–88.7 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.4) — by 5.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.4–83.5 LVA 85.6–88.5 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.4) — by 5.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.6–83.3 LVA 85.7–88.2 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.4) — by 5.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
-27.79
p-value
2.25e-64

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
GS 78.8–84.8 LVA 84.3–89.9 Overlap 0.51 pts Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 5.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

GS 79.2–84.3 LVA 84.7–89.5 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 5.3 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.6–84.0 LVA 85.0–89.2 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 5.3 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.8–83.8 LVA 85.2–88.9 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 5.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.0–83.6 LVA 85.4–88.7 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 5.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
-26.71
p-value
3.12e-62

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
GS 79.0–84.3 LVA 84.8–89.4 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.4 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.4–83.9 LVA 85.2–89.0 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.7–83.6 LVA 85.4–88.8 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.9–83.4 LVA 85.6–88.6 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.1–83.2 LVA 85.8–88.4 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 5.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
-32.43
p-value
2.21e-73

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson Tol Warning
GS 78.7–84.3 LVA 85.6–89.1 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 5.6 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.1–83.9 LVA 85.8–88.9 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 5.6 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.4–83.6 LVA 85.8–88.6 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 5.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.7–83.4 LVA 85.9–88.2 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 5.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.9–83.2 LVA 86.1–88.1 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 5.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
-32.18
p-value
1.03e-71

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
GS 78.8–84.2 LVA 84.3–89.9 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 5.5 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.3–83.8 LVA 84.7–89.5 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 5.5 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.5–83.5 LVA 85.0–89.2 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 5.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.8–83.3 LVA 85.2–88.9 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 5.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 79.9–83.1 LVA 85.4–88.7 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 5.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
-29.54
p-value
2.53e-68

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
GS 79.7–85.5 LVA 84.1–90.8 Overlap 1.34 pts Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.6) — by 4.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

GS 80.2–85.0 LVA 84.7–90.2 Overlap 0.35 pts Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.6) — by 4.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

GS 80.5–84.7 LVA 85.0–89.9 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.6) — by 4.9 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.7–84.5 LVA 85.3–89.6 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.6) — by 4.9 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

GS 80.9–84.3 LVA 85.5–89.4 No overlap Actual: GS 79, LVA 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.6) — by 4.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
-23.06
p-value
1.70e-53

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — GS at LVA — Actual: GS 79, LVA 84
Level GS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.3–84.3 84.7–89.6 — pts — No
90% 79.7–83.9 85.1–89.2 — pts — No
85% 80.0–83.7 85.4–89.0 — pts — No
80% 80.2–83.5 85.6–88.8 — pts — No
75% 80.4–83.3 85.8–88.6 — pts — No
Reg — GS at LVA — Actual: GS 79, LVA 84
Level GS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.1–84.4 84.7–90.0 — pts — No
90% 79.5–83.9 85.1–89.6 — pts — No
85% 79.8–83.7 85.4–89.3 — pts — No
80% 80.0–83.5 85.6–89.1 — pts — No
75% 80.2–83.3 85.8–88.9 — pts — No
Dr. Wallace — GS at LVA — Actual: GS 79, LVA 84
Level GS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.3–84.4 84.6–89.6 — pts — No
90% 79.7–84.0 85.0–89.2 — pts — No
85% 80.0–83.7 85.3–88.9 — pts — No
80% 80.2–83.5 85.5–88.7 — pts — No
75% 80.4–83.3 85.7–88.6 — pts — No
Kevin — GS at LVA — Actual: GS 79, LVA 84
Level GS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.4–84.0 85.0–89.5 — pts — No
90% 79.8–83.6 85.4–89.2 — pts — No
85% 80.0–83.4 85.6–88.9 — pts — No
80% 80.2–83.2 85.8–88.7 — pts — No
75% 80.3–83.1 85.9–88.6 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — GS at LVA — Actual: GS 79, LVA 84
Level GS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.4–83.4 84.2–88.7 — pts Yes No
90% 79.4–83.1 84.5–88.3 — pts Yes No
85% 79.6–82.9 84.8–88.1 — pts Yes No
80% 79.7–82.7 85.0–87.9 — pts Yes No
75% 79.8–82.5 85.1–87.7 — pts Yes No
Ice — GS at LVA — Actual: GS 79, LVA 84
Level GS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.4–84.9 84.7–89.8 0.21 pts — No
90% 78.9–84.4 85.1–89.4 — pts — No
85% 79.3–84.1 85.4–89.1 — pts — No
80% 79.5–83.8 85.6–88.9 — pts — No
75% 79.8–83.6 85.8–88.7 — pts — No
Jamal — GS at LVA — Actual: GS 79, LVA 84
Level GS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.3–84.6 84.3–89.3 0.24 pts Yes No
90% 78.8–84.1 85.4–89.0 — pts Yes No
85% 79.1–83.7 85.5–88.7 — pts Yes No
80% 79.4–83.5 85.6–88.5 — pts Yes No
75% 79.6–83.3 85.7–88.2 — pts Yes No
Jordan — GS at LVA — Actual: GS 79, LVA 84
Level GS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.8–84.8 84.3–89.9 0.51 pts — No
90% 79.2–84.3 84.7–89.5 — pts — No
85% 79.6–84.0 85.0–89.2 — pts — No
80% 79.8–83.8 85.2–88.9 — pts — No
75% 80.0–83.6 85.4–88.7 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — GS at LVA — Actual: GS 79, LVA 84
Level GS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.0–84.3 84.8–89.4 — pts — No
90% 79.4–83.9 85.2–89.0 — pts — No
85% 79.7–83.6 85.4–88.8 — pts — No
80% 79.9–83.4 85.6–88.6 — pts — No
75% 80.1–83.2 85.8–88.4 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — GS at LVA — Actual: GS 79, LVA 84
Level GS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.7–84.3 85.6–89.1 — pts Yes No
90% 79.1–83.9 85.8–88.9 — pts Yes No
85% 79.4–83.6 85.8–88.6 — pts Yes No
80% 79.7–83.4 85.9–88.2 — pts Yes No
75% 79.9–83.2 86.1–88.1 — pts Yes No
Lexi — GS at LVA — Actual: GS 79, LVA 84
Level GS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.8–84.2 84.3–89.9 — pts — No
90% 79.3–83.8 84.7–89.5 — pts — No
85% 79.5–83.5 85.0–89.2 — pts — No
80% 79.8–83.3 85.2–88.9 — pts — No
75% 79.9–83.1 85.4–88.7 — pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — GS at LVA — Actual: GS 79, LVA 84
Level GS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.7–85.5 84.1–90.8 1.34 pts — No
90% 80.2–85.0 84.7–90.2 0.35 pts — No
85% 80.5–84.7 85.0–89.9 — pts — No
80% 80.7–84.5 85.3–89.6 — pts — No
75% 80.9–84.3 85.5–89.4 — pts — No