Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 8, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Indiana Fever at Washington Mystics

IND 78 – WAS 76

June 8, 2026 · Final

Coach Sarah Watanabe

Best model for this game

Coach Sarah Watanabe
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for IND at WAS

All 12 models’ predicted scores

IND — one dot per model WAS — one dot per model Actual: IND 78, WAS 76
Vince Chambers Tol Warning
IND 84.2–88.8 WAS 79.6–84.3 Overlap 0.09 pts Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 84.6–88.5 WAS 80.1–83.5 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.6 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.8–88.2 WAS 80.5–83.3 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.0–88.0 WAS 80.9–83.0 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.2–87.9 WAS 81.0–83.0 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
29.04
p-value
5.76e-67

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
IND 83.6–89.6 WAS 79.6–84.2 Overlap 0.57 pts Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 84.1–89.1 WAS 80.0–83.8 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.4–88.8 WAS 80.2–83.6 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.6–88.6 WAS 80.4–83.4 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.8–88.4 WAS 80.5–83.2 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
25.97
p-value
2.42e-58

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
IND 84.2–89.2 WAS 79.6–84.3 Overlap 0.17 pts Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 84.6–88.8 WAS 80.0–84.0 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.8–88.6 WAS 80.2–83.7 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.1–88.4 WAS 80.4–83.5 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.2–88.2 WAS 80.6–83.4 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
28.34
p-value
2.25e-65

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin Tol Warning
IND 83.9–89.5 WAS 79.5–83.9 Overlap 0.04 pts Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 4.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 84.3–89.0 WAS 79.7–83.8 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 4.9 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.6–88.8 WAS 80.0–83.7 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 4.9 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.8–88.5 WAS 80.5–83.2 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 4.9 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.0–88.3 WAS 80.7–83.2 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 4.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
25.44
p-value
3.58e-59

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
IND 83.2–87.5 WAS 78.5–83.5 Overlap 0.24 pts Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 85.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.0) — by 4.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 83.6–87.1 WAS 78.9–83.1 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 85.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.0) — by 4.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 83.8–86.9 WAS 79.1–82.8 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 85.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.0) — by 4.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.0–86.8 WAS 79.3–82.6 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 85.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.0) — by 4.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.1–86.6 WAS 79.5–82.4 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 85.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.0) — by 4.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
27.76
p-value
1.93e-63

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
IND 84.3–88.8 WAS 79.8–84.2 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.5 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.6–88.4 WAS 80.2–83.8 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.5 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.9–88.2 WAS 80.4–83.6 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.0–88.0 WAS 80.6–83.4 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.2–87.9 WAS 80.7–83.3 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 4.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
29.93
p-value
1.01e-68

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
IND 84.6–88.5 WAS 79.6–84.2 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.9–88.2 WAS 80.0–83.8 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.1–88.0 WAS 80.2–83.6 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.3–87.8 WAS 80.4–83.4 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.4–87.7 WAS 80.5–83.2 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
32.15
p-value
1.14e-71

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan Tol Warning
IND 83.9–88.3 WAS 79.4–84.0 Overlap 0.06 pts Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 4.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 84.7–87.9 WAS 79.8–83.6 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 4.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.9–87.7 WAS 80.0–83.4 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 4.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.1–87.6 WAS 80.2–83.2 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 4.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.3–87.4 WAS 80.3–83.1 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 4.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
27.86
p-value
1.92e-63

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin Tol Warning
IND 84.0–89.0 WAS 80.2–84.1 Overlap 0.09 pts Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 84.4–88.6 WAS 80.3–83.5 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.6 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.6–88.3 WAS 80.3–83.5 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.8–88.1 WAS 80.5–83.3 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.0–88.0 WAS 80.7–83.1 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
26.63
p-value
1.98e-61

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson Tol Warning
IND 83.6–88.9 WAS 80.0–83.8 Overlap 0.17 pts Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 84.5–88.5 WAS 80.3–83.5 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.2–88.1 WAS 80.5–83.3 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.3–87.9 WAS 80.6–83.1 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 85.5–87.7 WAS 80.8–83.0 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 4.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
29.08
p-value
9.12e-63

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
IND 83.9–89.1 WAS 79.8–83.8 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 4.7 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.3–88.7 WAS 80.1–83.5 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 4.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.6–88.4 WAS 80.3–83.3 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 4.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.8–88.2 WAS 80.5–83.1 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 4.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

IND 84.9–88.0 WAS 80.6–83.0 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 4.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
29.17
p-value
1.05e-64

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
IND 84.1–89.3 WAS 80.8–86.0 Overlap 1.91 pts Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.5–88.9 WAS 81.2–85.6 Overlap 1.08 pts Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.8–88.6 WAS 81.5–85.3 Overlap 0.54 pts Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 85.0–88.4 WAS 81.7–85.1 Overlap 0.12 pts Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 85.2–88.2 WAS 81.9–84.9 No overlap Actual: IND 78, WAS 76

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
18.44
p-value
7.80e-42

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — IND at WAS — Actual: IND 78, WAS 76
Level IND range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.2–88.8 79.6–84.3 0.09 pts Yes No
90% 84.6–88.5 80.1–83.5 — pts Yes No
85% 84.8–88.2 80.5–83.3 — pts Yes No
80% 85.0–88.0 80.9–83.0 — pts Yes No
75% 85.2–87.9 81.0–83.0 — pts Yes No
Reg — IND at WAS — Actual: IND 78, WAS 76
Level IND range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.6–89.6 79.6–84.2 0.57 pts — No
90% 84.1–89.1 80.0–83.8 — pts — No
85% 84.4–88.8 80.2–83.6 — pts — No
80% 84.6–88.6 80.4–83.4 — pts — No
75% 84.8–88.4 80.5–83.2 — pts — No
Dr. Wallace — IND at WAS — Actual: IND 78, WAS 76
Level IND range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.2–89.2 79.6–84.3 0.17 pts — No
90% 84.6–88.8 80.0–84.0 — pts — No
85% 84.8–88.6 80.2–83.7 — pts — No
80% 85.1–88.4 80.4–83.5 — pts — No
75% 85.2–88.2 80.6–83.4 — pts — No
Kevin — IND at WAS — Actual: IND 78, WAS 76
Level IND range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.9–89.5 79.5–83.9 0.04 pts Yes No
90% 84.3–89.0 79.7–83.8 — pts Yes No
85% 84.6–88.8 80.0–83.7 — pts Yes No
80% 84.8–88.5 80.5–83.2 — pts Yes No
75% 85.0–88.3 80.7–83.2 — pts Yes No
Dr. Lila Shah — IND at WAS — Actual: IND 78, WAS 76
Level IND range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.2–87.5 78.5–83.5 0.24 pts — No
90% 83.6–87.1 78.9–83.1 — pts — No
85% 83.8–86.9 79.1–82.8 — pts — No
80% 84.0–86.8 79.3–82.6 — pts — No
75% 84.1–86.6 79.5–82.4 — pts — No
Ice — IND at WAS — Actual: IND 78, WAS 76
Level IND range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.3–88.8 79.8–84.2 — pts — No
90% 84.6–88.4 80.2–83.8 — pts — No
85% 84.9–88.2 80.4–83.6 — pts — No
80% 85.0–88.0 80.6–83.4 — pts — No
75% 85.2–87.9 80.7–83.3 — pts — No
Jamal — IND at WAS — Actual: IND 78, WAS 76
Level IND range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–88.5 79.6–84.2 — pts — No
90% 84.9–88.2 80.0–83.8 — pts — No
85% 85.1–88.0 80.2–83.6 — pts — No
80% 85.3–87.8 80.4–83.4 — pts — No
75% 85.4–87.7 80.5–83.2 — pts — No
Jordan — IND at WAS — Actual: IND 78, WAS 76
Level IND range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.9–88.3 79.4–84.0 0.06 pts Yes No
90% 84.7–87.9 79.8–83.6 — pts Yes No
85% 84.9–87.7 80.0–83.4 — pts Yes No
80% 85.1–87.6 80.2–83.2 — pts Yes No
75% 85.3–87.4 80.3–83.1 — pts Yes No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — IND at WAS — Actual: IND 78, WAS 76
Level IND range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.0–89.0 80.2–84.1 0.09 pts Yes No
90% 84.4–88.6 80.3–83.5 — pts Yes No
85% 84.6–88.3 80.3–83.5 — pts Yes No
80% 84.8–88.1 80.5–83.3 — pts Yes No
75% 85.0–88.0 80.7–83.1 — pts Yes No
Maya Jefferson — IND at WAS — Actual: IND 78, WAS 76
Level IND range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.6–88.9 80.0–83.8 0.17 pts Yes No
90% 84.5–88.5 80.3–83.5 — pts Yes No
85% 85.2–88.1 80.5–83.3 — pts Yes No
80% 85.3–87.9 80.6–83.1 — pts Yes No
75% 85.5–87.7 80.8–83.0 — pts Yes No
Lexi — IND at WAS — Actual: IND 78, WAS 76
Level IND range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.9–89.1 79.8–83.8 — pts — No
90% 84.3–88.7 80.1–83.5 — pts — No
85% 84.6–88.4 80.3–83.3 — pts — No
80% 84.8–88.2 80.5–83.1 — pts — No
75% 84.9–88.0 80.6–83.0 — pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — IND at WAS — Actual: IND 78, WAS 76
Level IND range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.1–89.3 80.8–86.0 1.91 pts — No
90% 84.5–88.9 81.2–85.6 1.08 pts — No
85% 84.8–88.6 81.5–85.3 0.54 pts — No
80% 85.0–88.4 81.7–85.1 0.12 pts — No
75% 85.2–88.2 81.9–84.9 — pts — No