Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 10, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Los Angeles Sparks at Seattle Storm

LAS 88 – SEA 83

June 10, 2026 · Final

Coach Sarah Watanabe

Best model for this game

Coach Sarah Watanabe
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for LAS at SEA

All 12 models’ predicted scores

LAS — one dot per model SEA — one dot per model Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83
Vince Chambers
LAS 81.8–86.4 SEA 77.6–82.2 Overlap 0.44 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.9) — by 4.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 82.1–86.0 SEA 78.0–81.8 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.9) — by 4.2 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.4–85.8 SEA 78.2–81.6 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.9) — by 4.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.5–85.6 SEA 78.4–81.4 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.9) — by 4.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.7–85.4 SEA 78.5–81.2 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.9) — by 4.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
26.41
p-value
5.69e-61

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
LAS 80.8–87.0 SEA 77.7–82.5 Overlap 1.67 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.1) — by 3.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 81.3–86.5 SEA 78.0–82.1 Overlap 0.78 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.1) — by 3.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.6–86.2 SEA 78.3–81.8 Overlap 0.21 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.1) — by 3.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.9–85.9 SEA 78.5–81.6 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.1) — by 3.8 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.1–85.7 SEA 78.7–81.5 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.1) — by 3.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
20.20
p-value
3.45e-45

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
LAS 81.7–86.6 SEA 78.0–82.2 Overlap 0.53 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.1) — by 4.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 82.1–86.2 SEA 78.3–81.8 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.1) — by 4.1 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.3–85.9 SEA 78.5–81.6 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.1) — by 4.1 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.5–85.7 SEA 78.7–81.5 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.1) — by 4.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.7–85.6 SEA 78.8–81.3 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.1) — by 4.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
25.76
p-value
7.22e-59

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
LAS 81.6–86.6 SEA 78.1–82.3 Overlap 0.65 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.2) — by 3.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 82.0–86.2 SEA 78.5–81.9 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.2) — by 3.9 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.3–85.9 SEA 78.7–81.7 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.2) — by 3.9 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.5–85.7 SEA 78.8–81.6 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.2) — by 3.9 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.6–85.6 SEA 79.0–81.4 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.2) — by 3.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
24.95
p-value
8.04e-57

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
LAS 81.0–86.1 SEA 78.9–82.7 Overlap 1.64 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.8) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 81.4–85.7 SEA 79.2–82.4 Overlap 0.94 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.8) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.7–85.4 SEA 79.4–82.2 Overlap 0.47 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.8) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.9–85.2 SEA 79.5–82.0 Overlap 0.12 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.8) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 82.1–85.0 SEA 79.7–81.9 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.8) — by 2.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
18.15
p-value
5.24e-40

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
LAS 81.8–86.5 SEA 77.7–83.0 Overlap 1.24 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 82.2–86.1 SEA 78.1–82.6 Overlap 0.44 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 82.4–85.8 SEA 78.4–82.3 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.8 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.6–85.6 SEA 78.6–82.1 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.8 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.7–85.5 SEA 78.8–81.9 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
21.92
p-value
3.34e-50

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
LAS 81.5–86.3 SEA 77.7–82.9 Overlap 1.47 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 81.9–85.9 SEA 78.1–82.5 Overlap 0.66 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 82.1–85.7 SEA 78.4–82.2 Overlap 0.13 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 82.3–85.5 SEA 78.6–82.0 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.5–85.3 SEA 78.8–81.9 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
20.69
p-value
1.78e-47

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
LAS 81.4–86.6 SEA 77.8–82.9 Overlap 1.46 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 81.8–86.2 SEA 78.2–82.5 Overlap 0.64 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 82.1–85.9 SEA 78.5–82.2 Overlap 0.1 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 82.3–85.7 SEA 78.7–82.0 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.5–85.5 SEA 78.9–81.8 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
20.86
p-value
5.30e-48

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
LAS 81.6–86.3 SEA 77.8–82.9 Overlap 1.31 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 81.9–85.9 SEA 78.2–82.5 Overlap 0.52 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 82.2–85.6 SEA 78.4–82.2 Overlap 0.01 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 82.4–85.4 SEA 78.7–82.0 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.5–85.3 SEA 78.8–81.8 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
21.36
p-value
4.21e-49

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson Tol Warning
LAS 81.1–86.8 SEA 79.0–82.5 Overlap 1.35 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 81.6–86.4 SEA 79.1–81.9 Overlap 0.34 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.9–86.1 SEA 79.2–81.7 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.1–85.8 SEA 79.2–81.5 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.3–85.7 SEA 79.2–81.4 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
21.04
p-value
4.52e-47

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi Tol Warning
LAS 81.3–86.8 SEA 78.3–82.5 Overlap 1.19 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 81.7–86.3 SEA 78.6–81.9 Overlap 0.21 pts Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 82.0–86.0 SEA 78.7–81.8 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.2–85.8 SEA 78.9–81.6 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.4–85.6 SEA 79.2–81.5 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 84.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.3) — by 3.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
20.53
p-value
4.83e-47

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
LAS 82.7–88.3 SEA 77.7–82.0 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.9) — by 5.6 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 83.1–87.8 SEA 78.0–81.7 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.9) — by 5.6 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 83.4–87.5 SEA 78.3–81.5 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.9) — by 5.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 83.6–87.3 SEA 78.4–81.3 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.9) — by 5.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 83.8–87.1 SEA 78.6–81.1 No overlap Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.9) — by 5.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
32.73
p-value
1.85e-71

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — LAS at SEA — Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83
Level LAS range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.8–86.4 77.6–82.2 0.44 pts — No
90% 82.1–86.0 78.0–81.8 — pts — No
85% 82.4–85.8 78.2–81.6 — pts — No
80% 82.5–85.6 78.4–81.4 — pts — No
75% 82.7–85.4 78.5–81.2 — pts — No
Reg — LAS at SEA — Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83
Level LAS range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.8–87.0 77.7–82.5 1.67 pts — No
90% 81.3–86.5 78.0–82.1 0.78 pts — No
85% 81.6–86.2 78.3–81.8 0.21 pts — No
80% 81.9–85.9 78.5–81.6 — pts — No
75% 82.1–85.7 78.7–81.5 — pts — No
Dr. Wallace — LAS at SEA — Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83
Level LAS range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.7–86.6 78.0–82.2 0.53 pts — No
90% 82.1–86.2 78.3–81.8 — pts — No
85% 82.3–85.9 78.5–81.6 — pts — No
80% 82.5–85.7 78.7–81.5 — pts — No
75% 82.7–85.6 78.8–81.3 — pts — No
Kevin — LAS at SEA — Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83
Level LAS range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.6–86.6 78.1–82.3 0.65 pts — No
90% 82.0–86.2 78.5–81.9 — pts — No
85% 82.3–85.9 78.7–81.7 — pts — No
80% 82.5–85.7 78.8–81.6 — pts — No
75% 82.6–85.6 79.0–81.4 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — LAS at SEA — Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83
Level LAS range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.0–86.1 78.9–82.7 1.64 pts — No
90% 81.4–85.7 79.2–82.4 0.94 pts — No
85% 81.7–85.4 79.4–82.2 0.47 pts — No
80% 81.9–85.2 79.5–82.0 0.12 pts — No
75% 82.1–85.0 79.7–81.9 — pts — No
Ice — LAS at SEA — Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83
Level LAS range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.8–86.5 77.7–83.0 1.24 pts — No
90% 82.2–86.1 78.1–82.6 0.44 pts — No
85% 82.4–85.8 78.4–82.3 — pts — No
80% 82.6–85.6 78.6–82.1 — pts — No
75% 82.7–85.5 78.8–81.9 — pts — No
Jamal — LAS at SEA — Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83
Level LAS range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.5–86.3 77.7–82.9 1.47 pts — No
90% 81.9–85.9 78.1–82.5 0.66 pts — No
85% 82.1–85.7 78.4–82.2 0.13 pts — No
80% 82.3–85.5 78.6–82.0 — pts — No
75% 82.5–85.3 78.8–81.9 — pts — No
Jordan — LAS at SEA — Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83
Level LAS range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.4–86.6 77.8–82.9 1.46 pts — No
90% 81.8–86.2 78.2–82.5 0.64 pts — No
85% 82.1–85.9 78.5–82.2 0.1 pts — No
80% 82.3–85.7 78.7–82.0 — pts — No
75% 82.5–85.5 78.9–81.8 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — LAS at SEA — Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83
Level LAS range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.6–86.3 77.8–82.9 1.31 pts — No
90% 81.9–85.9 78.2–82.5 0.52 pts — No
85% 82.2–85.6 78.4–82.2 0.01 pts — No
80% 82.4–85.4 78.7–82.0 — pts — No
75% 82.5–85.3 78.8–81.8 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — LAS at SEA — Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83
Level LAS range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.1–86.8 79.0–82.5 1.35 pts Yes No
90% 81.6–86.4 79.1–81.9 0.34 pts Yes No
85% 81.9–86.1 79.2–81.7 — pts Yes No
80% 82.1–85.8 79.2–81.5 — pts Yes No
75% 82.3–85.7 79.2–81.4 — pts Yes No
Lexi — LAS at SEA — Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83
Level LAS range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.3–86.8 78.3–82.5 1.19 pts Yes No
90% 81.7–86.3 78.6–81.9 0.21 pts Yes No
85% 82.0–86.0 78.7–81.8 — pts Yes No
80% 82.2–85.8 78.9–81.6 — pts Yes No
75% 82.4–85.6 79.2–81.5 — pts Yes No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — LAS at SEA — Actual: LAS 88, SEA 83
Level LAS range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.7–88.3 77.7–82.0 — pts — No
90% 83.1–87.8 78.0–81.7 — pts — No
85% 83.4–87.5 78.3–81.5 — pts — No
80% 83.6–87.3 78.4–81.3 — pts — No
75% 83.8–87.1 78.6–81.1 — pts — No