Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 11, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Las Vegas Aces at Portland Fire

LVA 105 – POR 89

June 11, 2026 · Final

Coach Sarah Watanabe

Best model for this game

Coach Sarah Watanabe
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for LVA at POR

All 12 models’ predicted scores

LVA — one dot per model POR — one dot per model Actual: LVA 105, POR 89
Vince Chambers
LVA 85.2–90.5 POR 79.2–83.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.3 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.6–90.1 POR 79.6–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.3 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.9–89.8 POR 79.8–83.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.3 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.1–89.6 POR 80.0–83.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.3–89.4 POR 80.1–82.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
36.81
p-value
2.10e-80

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
LVA 85.2–91.1 POR 79.1–84.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.5 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.7–90.6 POR 79.5–83.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.5 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–90.3 POR 79.8–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–90.1 POR 80.0–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.4–89.9 POR 80.2–83.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
34.28
p-value
8.62e-76

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
LVA 85.4–90.0 POR 78.8–84.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.2 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.7–89.6 POR 79.2–83.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.2 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–89.4 POR 79.5–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–89.2 POR 79.7–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.3–89.1 POR 79.9–83.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
35.31
p-value
2.66e-77

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
LVA 85.6–90.6 POR 79.2–83.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.5 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–90.2 POR 79.6–83.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.5 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.3–89.9 POR 79.8–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.5–89.7 POR 80.0–83.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.6–89.6 POR 80.2–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
39.33
p-value
2.79e-85

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah Tol Warning
LVA 85.4–90.1 POR 78.2–85.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 5.5 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.5–89.5 POR 78.7–84.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 5.5 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.7–89.4 POR 79.1–84.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 5.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.9–89.1 POR 79.4–83.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 5.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–88.4 POR 79.6–83.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 5.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
25.29
p-value
4.62e-58

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
LVA 85.4–89.7 POR 79.4–84.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.9) — by 5.7 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.7–89.3 POR 79.8–83.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.9) — by 5.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–89.1 POR 80.0–83.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.9) — by 5.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.1–88.9 POR 80.2–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.9) — by 5.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.3–88.8 POR 80.4–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.9) — by 5.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
35.74
p-value
2.57e-78

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal Tol Warning
LVA 86.0–90.3 POR 79.5–83.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.0 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–90.0 POR 79.9–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.0 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–89.5 POR 80.1–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.0 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.3–89.0 POR 80.3–83.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.4–88.9 POR 80.4–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
37.33
p-value
4.99e-81

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
LVA 85.1–89.8 POR 79.4–84.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 5.7 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.5–89.4 POR 79.8–83.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 5.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.7–89.1 POR 80.0–83.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 5.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.9–88.9 POR 80.2–83.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 5.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.1–88.8 POR 80.4–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 5.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
36.32
p-value
2.62e-80

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin Tol Warning
LVA 86.0–90.0 POR 79.1–84.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.0 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–89.7 POR 79.5–84.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.0 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–89.2 POR 79.8–83.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.0 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.4–88.9 POR 80.0–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.5–88.8 POR 80.2–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
33.69
p-value
1.80e-75

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson Tol Warning
LVA 85.2–89.6 POR 79.9–84.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 5.7 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.6–89.3 POR 80.1–83.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 5.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.8–89.0 POR 80.2–83.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 5.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–88.9 POR 80.3–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 5.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.1–88.7 POR 80.4–83.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 5.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
34.47
p-value
1.30e-75

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
LVA 85.2–89.8 POR 78.9–84.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.0 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.6–89.4 POR 79.3–83.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.0 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.8–89.2 POR 79.6–83.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.0 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–89.0 POR 79.8–83.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–88.9 POR 80.0–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
35.44
p-value
5.81e-78

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
LVA 84.9–90.7 POR 78.9–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) — by 6.8 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.3–90.2 POR 79.2–82.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) — by 6.8 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.6–89.9 POR 79.4–82.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) — by 6.8 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.8–89.6 POR 79.6–82.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) — by 6.8 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–89.4 POR 79.7–82.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 105, POR 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) — by 6.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
39.44
p-value
1.11e-79

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 105, POR 89
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.2–90.5 79.2–83.9 — pts — No
90% 85.6–90.1 79.6–83.5 — pts — No
85% 85.9–89.8 79.8–83.2 — pts — No
80% 86.1–89.6 80.0–83.1 — pts — No
75% 86.3–89.4 80.1–82.9 — pts — No
Reg — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 105, POR 89
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.2–91.1 79.1–84.2 — pts — No
90% 85.7–90.6 79.5–83.8 — pts — No
85% 86.0–90.3 79.8–83.5 — pts — No
80% 86.2–90.1 80.0–83.3 — pts — No
75% 86.4–89.9 80.2–83.2 — pts — No
Dr. Wallace — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 105, POR 89
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.4–90.0 78.8–84.3 — pts — No
90% 85.7–89.6 79.2–83.8 — pts — No
85% 86.0–89.4 79.5–83.5 — pts — No
80% 86.2–89.2 79.7–83.3 — pts — No
75% 86.3–89.1 79.9–83.1 — pts — No
Kevin — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 105, POR 89
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.6–90.6 79.2–83.9 — pts — No
90% 86.0–90.2 79.6–83.6 — pts — No
85% 86.3–89.9 79.8–83.3 — pts — No
80% 86.5–89.7 80.0–83.1 — pts — No
75% 86.6–89.6 80.2–83.0 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 105, POR 89
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.4–90.1 78.2–85.0 — pts Yes No
90% 85.5–89.5 78.7–84.4 — pts Yes No
85% 85.7–89.4 79.1–84.1 — pts Yes No
80% 85.9–89.1 79.4–83.8 — pts Yes No
75% 86.0–88.4 79.6–83.6 — pts Yes No
Ice — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 105, POR 89
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.4–89.7 79.4–84.3 — pts — No
90% 85.7–89.3 79.8–83.9 — pts — No
85% 86.0–89.1 80.0–83.7 — pts — No
80% 86.1–88.9 80.2–83.5 — pts — No
75% 86.3–88.8 80.4–83.3 — pts — No
Jamal — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 105, POR 89
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.0–90.3 79.5–83.8 — pts Yes No
90% 86.2–90.0 79.9–83.5 — pts Yes No
85% 86.2–89.5 80.1–83.3 — pts Yes No
80% 86.3–89.0 80.3–83.1 — pts Yes No
75% 86.4–88.9 80.4–83.0 — pts Yes No
Jordan — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 105, POR 89
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.1–89.8 79.4–84.0 — pts — No
90% 85.5–89.4 79.8–83.6 — pts — No
85% 85.7–89.1 80.0–83.4 — pts — No
80% 85.9–88.9 80.2–83.2 — pts — No
75% 86.1–88.8 80.4–83.0 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 105, POR 89
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.0–90.0 79.1–84.4 — pts Yes No
90% 86.2–89.7 79.5–84.0 — pts Yes No
85% 86.2–89.2 79.8–83.7 — pts Yes No
80% 86.4–88.9 80.0–83.5 — pts Yes No
75% 86.5–88.8 80.2–83.3 — pts Yes No
Maya Jefferson — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 105, POR 89
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.2–89.6 79.9–84.1 — pts Yes No
90% 85.6–89.3 80.1–83.6 — pts Yes No
85% 85.8–89.0 80.2–83.4 — pts Yes No
80% 86.0–88.9 80.3–83.3 — pts Yes No
75% 86.1–88.7 80.4–83.1 — pts Yes No
Lexi — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 105, POR 89
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.2–89.8 78.9–84.1 — pts — No
90% 85.6–89.4 79.3–83.7 — pts — No
85% 85.8–89.2 79.6–83.4 — pts — No
80% 86.0–89.0 79.8–83.2 — pts — No
75% 86.2–88.9 80.0–83.0 — pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 105, POR 89
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.9–90.7 78.9–83.0 — pts — No
90% 85.3–90.2 79.2–82.6 — pts — No
85% 85.6–89.9 79.4–82.4 — pts — No
80% 85.8–89.6 79.6–82.3 — pts — No
75% 86.0–89.4 79.7–82.1 — pts — No