Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 13, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Dallas Wings at Portland Fire

DAL 83 – POR 84

June 13, 2026 · Final

Dr. Lila Shah

Best model for this game

Dr. Lila Shah
All models: 0-12
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for DAL at POR

All 12 models’ predicted scores

DAL — one dot per model POR — one dot per model Actual: DAL 83, POR 84
Vince Chambers
DAL 82.2–87.3 POR 78.8–83.8 Overlap 1.56 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.6–86.9 POR 79.2–83.4 Overlap 0.75 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.9–86.6 POR 79.4–83.1 Overlap 0.23 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.1–86.4 POR 79.6–82.9 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.3–86.2 POR 79.8–82.8 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
20.14
p-value
3.44e-46

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg Tol Warning
DAL 82.0–88.0 POR 79.9–83.6 Overlap 1.61 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.5–87.5 POR 80.0–83.3 Overlap 0.83 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.8–87.2 POR 80.1–83.0 Overlap 0.14 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.1–87.0 POR 80.3–82.9 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.3–86.8 POR 80.4–82.8 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
19.60
p-value
9.82e-44

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
DAL 82.4–87.0 POR 79.0–83.6 Overlap 1.16 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.8–86.6 POR 79.3–83.2 Overlap 0.42 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.0–86.4 POR 79.6–83.0 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.2–86.2 POR 79.8–82.8 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.4–86.1 POR 79.9–82.6 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
21.84
p-value
2.03e-50

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin Tol Warning
DAL 82.9–86.7 POR 78.8–83.7 Overlap 0.79 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.0–86.5 POR 79.2–83.3 Overlap 0.3 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.3–86.3 POR 79.5–83.1 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.4–86.2 POR 79.7–82.9 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.6–86.1 POR 79.8–82.7 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
20.20
p-value
2.45e-46

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
DAL 81.7–86.4 POR 78.8–84.2 Overlap 2.56 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 2.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.0–86.0 POR 79.3–83.8 Overlap 1.75 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 2.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.3–85.8 POR 79.6–83.5 Overlap 1.21 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 2.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.5–85.6 POR 79.8–83.3 Overlap 0.81 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.6–85.4 POR 80.0–83.1 Overlap 0.47 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
14.43
p-value
7.42e-31

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
DAL 82.2–87.1 POR 78.4–84.1 Overlap 1.99 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.5–86.7 POR 78.9–83.7 Overlap 1.13 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.8–86.4 POR 79.2–83.4 Overlap 0.57 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.0–86.2 POR 79.4–83.1 Overlap 0.15 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.2–86.1 POR 79.6–83.0 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
18.25
p-value
5.75e-41

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
DAL 82.2–87.0 POR 78.9–83.9 Overlap 1.73 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.5–86.6 POR 79.3–83.5 Overlap 0.94 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.8–86.3 POR 79.5–83.2 Overlap 0.43 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.0–86.1 POR 79.8–83.0 Overlap 0.03 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.2–86.0 POR 79.9–82.9 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
18.91
p-value
4.88e-43

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
DAL 81.8–87.0 POR 79.0–83.5 Overlap 1.67 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.2–86.6 POR 79.3–83.1 Overlap 0.9 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.5–86.3 POR 79.6–82.9 Overlap 0.39 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.7–86.1 POR 79.7–82.7 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 3.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 82.9–85.9 POR 79.9–82.6 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
19.07
p-value
3.36e-43

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
DAL 82.3–87.1 POR 79.2–83.6 Overlap 1.24 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.7–86.7 POR 79.6–83.2 Overlap 0.5 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.0–86.5 POR 79.8–83.0 Overlap 0.03 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.2–86.3 POR 80.0–82.8 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.3–86.1 POR 80.1–82.7 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.4) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
21.27
p-value
7.54e-49

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson Tol Warning
DAL 83.2–87.1 POR 78.6–83.7 Overlap 0.43 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 3.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.3–86.5 POR 79.0–83.3 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 3.6 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.5–86.4 POR 79.3–83.0 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 3.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.6–86.3 POR 79.5–82.8 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 3.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.8–86.1 POR 79.7–82.6 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 3.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
21.34
p-value
4.11e-49

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi Tol Warning
DAL 82.9–86.2 POR 79.0–84.0 Overlap 1.08 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 83.1–86.0 POR 79.4–83.6 Overlap 0.49 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.4–86.0 POR 79.7–83.3 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 3.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.5–85.8 POR 79.9–83.1 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 3.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.5–85.8 POR 80.0–82.9 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
19.93
p-value
2.20e-45

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
DAL 81.9–87.4 POR 77.1–82.9 Overlap 1.05 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.0) — by 4.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.3–87.0 POR 77.6–82.5 Overlap 0.14 pts Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.0) — by 4.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.6–86.7 POR 77.9–82.2 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.0) — by 4.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 82.8–86.5 POR 78.1–81.9 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.0) — by 4.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.0–86.3 POR 78.3–81.7 No overlap Actual: DAL 83, POR 84

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.0) — by 4.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
23.68
p-value
2.02e-54

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 83, POR 84
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.2–87.3 78.8–83.8 1.56 pts — No
90% 82.6–86.9 79.2–83.4 0.75 pts — No
85% 82.9–86.6 79.4–83.1 0.23 pts — No
80% 83.1–86.4 79.6–82.9 — pts — No
75% 83.3–86.2 79.8–82.8 — pts — No
Reg — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 83, POR 84
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.0–88.0 79.9–83.6 1.61 pts Yes No
90% 82.5–87.5 80.0–83.3 0.83 pts Yes No
85% 82.8–87.2 80.1–83.0 0.14 pts Yes No
80% 83.1–87.0 80.3–82.9 — pts Yes No
75% 83.3–86.8 80.4–82.8 — pts Yes No
Dr. Wallace — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 83, POR 84
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.4–87.0 79.0–83.6 1.16 pts — No
90% 82.8–86.6 79.3–83.2 0.42 pts — No
85% 83.0–86.4 79.6–83.0 — pts — No
80% 83.2–86.2 79.8–82.8 — pts — No
75% 83.4–86.1 79.9–82.6 — pts — No
Kevin — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 83, POR 84
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.9–86.7 78.8–83.7 0.79 pts Yes No
90% 83.0–86.5 79.2–83.3 0.3 pts Yes No
85% 83.3–86.3 79.5–83.1 — pts Yes No
80% 83.4–86.2 79.7–82.9 — pts Yes No
75% 83.6–86.1 79.8–82.7 — pts Yes No
Dr. Lila Shah — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 83, POR 84
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.7–86.4 78.8–84.2 2.56 pts — Yes
90% 82.0–86.0 79.3–83.8 1.75 pts — No
85% 82.3–85.8 79.6–83.5 1.21 pts — No
80% 82.5–85.6 79.8–83.3 0.81 pts — No
75% 82.6–85.4 80.0–83.1 0.47 pts — No
Ice — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 83, POR 84
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.2–87.1 78.4–84.1 1.99 pts — Yes
90% 82.5–86.7 78.9–83.7 1.13 pts — No
85% 82.8–86.4 79.2–83.4 0.57 pts — No
80% 83.0–86.2 79.4–83.1 0.15 pts — No
75% 83.2–86.1 79.6–83.0 — pts — No
Jamal — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 83, POR 84
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.2–87.0 78.9–83.9 1.73 pts — No
90% 82.5–86.6 79.3–83.5 0.94 pts — No
85% 82.8–86.3 79.5–83.2 0.43 pts — No
80% 83.0–86.1 79.8–83.0 0.03 pts — No
75% 83.2–86.0 79.9–82.9 — pts — No
Jordan — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 83, POR 84
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.8–87.0 79.0–83.5 1.67 pts — No
90% 82.2–86.6 79.3–83.1 0.9 pts — No
85% 82.5–86.3 79.6–82.9 0.39 pts — No
80% 82.7–86.1 79.7–82.7 — pts — No
75% 82.9–85.9 79.9–82.6 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 83, POR 84
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.3–87.1 79.2–83.6 1.24 pts — No
90% 82.7–86.7 79.6–83.2 0.5 pts — No
85% 83.0–86.5 79.8–83.0 0.03 pts — No
80% 83.2–86.3 80.0–82.8 — pts — No
75% 83.3–86.1 80.1–82.7 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 83, POR 84
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.2–87.1 78.6–83.7 0.43 pts Yes No
90% 83.3–86.5 79.0–83.3 — pts Yes No
85% 83.5–86.4 79.3–83.0 — pts Yes No
80% 83.6–86.3 79.5–82.8 — pts Yes No
75% 83.8–86.1 79.7–82.6 — pts Yes No
Lexi — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 83, POR 84
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.9–86.2 79.0–84.0 1.08 pts Yes Yes
90% 83.1–86.0 79.4–83.6 0.49 pts Yes No
85% 83.4–86.0 79.7–83.3 — pts Yes No
80% 83.5–85.8 79.9–83.1 — pts Yes No
75% 83.5–85.8 80.0–82.9 — pts Yes No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 83, POR 84
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.9–87.4 77.1–82.9 1.05 pts — No
90% 82.3–87.0 77.6–82.5 0.14 pts — No
85% 82.6–86.7 77.9–82.2 — pts — No
80% 82.8–86.5 78.1–81.9 — pts — No
75% 83.0–86.3 78.3–81.7 — pts — No