Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 15, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Los Angeles Sparks at Golden State Valkyries

LAS 58 – GS 78

June 15, 2026 · Final

Dr. Lila Shah

Best model for this game

Dr. Lila Shah
All models: 0-12
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for LAS at GS

All 12 models’ predicted scores

LAS — one dot per model GS — one dot per model Actual: LAS 58, GS 78
Vince Chambers Tol Warning
LAS 82.6–87.5 GS 79.7–84.6 Overlap 2.04 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.1) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.0–87.4 GS 80.1–84.2 Overlap 1.23 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.1) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.2–87.4 GS 80.3–83.9 Overlap 0.78 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.1) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.9–86.9 GS 80.5–83.7 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.1) — by 3.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 84.1–86.8 GS 80.7–83.6 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.1) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
15.97
p-value
2.08e-34

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg Tol Warning
LAS 82.1–88.2 GS 80.5–84.7 Overlap 2.67 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.5) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 82.6–87.7 GS 80.9–84.3 Overlap 1.72 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.5) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 82.9–87.4 GS 80.9–84.2 Overlap 1.26 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.5) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.1–87.1 GS 80.9–83.7 Overlap 0.56 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.5) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.3–86.9 GS 81.2–83.6 Overlap 0.25 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.5) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
12.91
p-value
1.22e-26

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace Tol Warning
LAS 82.0–87.1 GS 80.3–84.9 Overlap 2.89 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.3) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 82.4–87.0 GS 80.7–84.2 Overlap 1.77 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.3) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.2–86.8 GS 80.8–84.0 Overlap 0.79 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.3) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.6–86.5 GS 80.9–83.7 Overlap 0.12 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.3) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.7–86.4 GS 81.0–83.5 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.3) — by 2.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
14.35
p-value
1.13e-30

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin Tol Warning
LAS 82.7–87.4 GS 79.4–84.6 Overlap 1.88 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.0) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.1–87.0 GS 79.9–84.1 Overlap 1.06 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.0) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.6–86.8 GS 80.1–83.9 Overlap 0.25 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.0) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.8–86.7 GS 80.3–83.7 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.0) — by 3.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 84.0–86.5 GS 80.5–83.5 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.0) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
17.85
p-value
5.70e-40

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
LAS 81.0–86.9 GS 78.5–84.7 Overlap 3.7 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LAS 81.4–86.4 GS 79.0–84.2 Overlap 2.73 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 81.7–86.1 GS 79.3–83.8 Overlap 2.09 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 82.0–85.9 GS 79.6–83.6 Overlap 1.61 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 82.2–85.7 GS 79.8–83.4 Overlap 1.2 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
11.26
p-value
4.26e-22

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice Tol Warning
LAS 82.0–86.9 GS 79.4–84.4 Overlap 2.37 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.9) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.1–86.7 GS 79.8–84.0 Overlap 0.92 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.9) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.2–86.5 GS 80.1–83.7 Overlap 0.5 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.9) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.6–86.3 GS 80.3–83.5 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.9) — by 3.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 83.9–86.2 GS 80.4–83.4 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.9) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
17.89
p-value
3.70e-40

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal Tol Warning
LAS 82.7–87.4 GS 79.5–84.5 Overlap 1.77 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.0) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.1–86.7 GS 79.9–84.1 Overlap 1.02 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.0) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.9–86.5 GS 80.2–83.8 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.0) — by 3.1 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 84.0–86.4 GS 80.4–83.6 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.0) — by 3.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 84.1–86.2 GS 80.5–83.5 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.0) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
18.01
p-value
1.67e-40

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan Tol Warning
LAS 82.2–86.9 GS 79.8–84.7 Overlap 2.49 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.2) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.4–86.7 GS 80.2–84.3 Overlap 0.93 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.2) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.5–86.6 GS 80.4–84.0 Overlap 0.59 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.2) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.7–86.5 GS 80.6–83.8 Overlap 0.13 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.2) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.8–86.5 GS 80.8–83.7 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.2) — by 2.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
15.53
p-value
1.64e-33

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
LAS 82.6–88.0 GS 79.8–84.3 Overlap 1.72 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.1) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.1–87.6 GS 80.1–84.0 Overlap 0.92 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.1) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.3–87.3 GS 80.4–83.7 Overlap 0.4 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.1) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.6–87.1 GS 80.6–83.6 Overlap 0.0 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.1) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.7–86.9 GS 80.7–83.4 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.1) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
18.93
p-value
1.85e-42

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson Tol Warning
LAS 82.2–86.8 GS 79.9–84.9 Overlap 2.7 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.4) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.0–86.7 GS 80.3–84.5 Overlap 1.54 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.4) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.9–86.6 GS 80.6–84.2 Overlap 0.38 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.4) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.9–86.6 GS 80.8–84.0 Overlap 0.11 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.4) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 84.1–86.4 GS 80.9–83.9 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.2) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.4) — by 2.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
16.03
p-value
2.93e-35

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
LAS 82.6–88.1 GS 79.7–84.7 Overlap 2.04 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.2) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.1–87.7 GS 80.1–84.3 Overlap 1.19 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.2) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.4–87.4 GS 80.3–84.0 Overlap 0.64 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.2) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.6–87.2 GS 80.5–83.8 Overlap 0.22 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.2) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 83.8–87.0 GS 80.7–83.6 No overlap Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.4) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.2) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
17.76
p-value
9.68e-40

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe Tol Warning
LAS 82.9–87.3 GS 80.2–85.5 Overlap 2.56 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.5) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.2–87.0 GS 80.6–85.0 Overlap 1.88 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.5) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 83.6–86.8 GS 80.9–84.8 Overlap 1.16 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.5) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 84.1–86.6 GS 81.1–84.5 Overlap 0.47 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.5) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 84.1–86.6 GS 81.3–84.4 Overlap 0.24 pts Actual: LAS 58, GS 78

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.5) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
14.90
p-value
3.73e-32

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — LAS at GS — Actual: LAS 58, GS 78
Level LAS range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.6–87.5 79.7–84.6 2.04 pts Yes No
90% 83.0–87.4 80.1–84.2 1.23 pts Yes No
85% 83.2–87.4 80.3–83.9 0.78 pts Yes No
80% 83.9–86.9 80.5–83.7 — pts Yes No
75% 84.1–86.8 80.7–83.6 — pts Yes No
Reg — LAS at GS — Actual: LAS 58, GS 78
Level LAS range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.1–88.2 80.5–84.7 2.67 pts Yes No
90% 82.6–87.7 80.9–84.3 1.72 pts Yes No
85% 82.9–87.4 80.9–84.2 1.26 pts Yes No
80% 83.1–87.1 80.9–83.7 0.56 pts Yes No
75% 83.3–86.9 81.2–83.6 0.25 pts Yes No
Dr. Wallace — LAS at GS — Actual: LAS 58, GS 78
Level LAS range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.0–87.1 80.3–84.9 2.89 pts Yes No
90% 82.4–87.0 80.7–84.2 1.77 pts Yes No
85% 83.2–86.8 80.8–84.0 0.79 pts Yes No
80% 83.6–86.5 80.9–83.7 0.12 pts Yes No
75% 83.7–86.4 81.0–83.5 — pts Yes No
Kevin — LAS at GS — Actual: LAS 58, GS 78
Level LAS range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.7–87.4 79.4–84.6 1.88 pts Yes No
90% 83.1–87.0 79.9–84.1 1.06 pts Yes No
85% 83.6–86.8 80.1–83.9 0.25 pts Yes No
80% 83.8–86.7 80.3–83.7 — pts Yes No
75% 84.0–86.5 80.5–83.5 — pts Yes No
Dr. Lila Shah — LAS at GS — Actual: LAS 58, GS 78
Level LAS range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.0–86.9 78.5–84.7 3.7 pts — No
90% 81.4–86.4 79.0–84.2 2.73 pts — No
85% 81.7–86.1 79.3–83.8 2.09 pts — No
80% 82.0–85.9 79.6–83.6 1.61 pts — No
75% 82.2–85.7 79.8–83.4 1.2 pts — No
Ice — LAS at GS — Actual: LAS 58, GS 78
Level LAS range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.0–86.9 79.4–84.4 2.37 pts Yes No
90% 83.1–86.7 79.8–84.0 0.92 pts Yes No
85% 83.2–86.5 80.1–83.7 0.5 pts Yes No
80% 83.6–86.3 80.3–83.5 — pts Yes No
75% 83.9–86.2 80.4–83.4 — pts Yes No
Jamal — LAS at GS — Actual: LAS 58, GS 78
Level LAS range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.7–87.4 79.5–84.5 1.77 pts Yes No
90% 83.1–86.7 79.9–84.1 1.02 pts Yes No
85% 83.9–86.5 80.2–83.8 — pts Yes No
80% 84.0–86.4 80.4–83.6 — pts Yes No
75% 84.1–86.2 80.5–83.5 — pts Yes No
Jordan — LAS at GS — Actual: LAS 58, GS 78
Level LAS range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.2–86.9 79.8–84.7 2.49 pts Yes No
90% 83.4–86.7 80.2–84.3 0.93 pts Yes No
85% 83.5–86.6 80.4–84.0 0.59 pts Yes No
80% 83.7–86.5 80.6–83.8 0.13 pts Yes No
75% 83.8–86.5 80.8–83.7 — pts Yes No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — LAS at GS — Actual: LAS 58, GS 78
Level LAS range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.6–88.0 79.8–84.3 1.72 pts — No
90% 83.1–87.6 80.1–84.0 0.92 pts — No
85% 83.3–87.3 80.4–83.7 0.4 pts — No
80% 83.6–87.1 80.6–83.6 0.0 pts — No
75% 83.7–86.9 80.7–83.4 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — LAS at GS — Actual: LAS 58, GS 78
Level LAS range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.2–86.8 79.9–84.9 2.7 pts Yes No
90% 83.0–86.7 80.3–84.5 1.54 pts Yes No
85% 83.9–86.6 80.6–84.2 0.38 pts Yes No
80% 83.9–86.6 80.8–84.0 0.11 pts Yes No
75% 84.1–86.4 80.9–83.9 — pts Yes No
Lexi — LAS at GS — Actual: LAS 58, GS 78
Level LAS range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.6–88.1 79.7–84.7 2.04 pts — No
90% 83.1–87.7 80.1–84.3 1.19 pts — No
85% 83.4–87.4 80.3–84.0 0.64 pts — No
80% 83.6–87.2 80.5–83.8 0.22 pts — No
75% 83.8–87.0 80.7–83.6 — pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — LAS at GS — Actual: LAS 58, GS 78
Level LAS range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.9–87.3 80.2–85.5 2.56 pts Yes No
90% 83.2–87.0 80.6–85.0 1.88 pts Yes No
85% 83.6–86.8 80.9–84.8 1.16 pts Yes No
80% 84.1–86.6 81.1–84.5 0.47 pts Yes No
75% 84.1–86.6 81.3–84.4 0.24 pts Yes No