Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 15, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Las Vegas Aces at Dallas Wings

LVA 66 – DAL 96

June 15, 2026 · Final

Coach Sarah Watanabe

Best model for this game

Coach Sarah Watanabe
All models: 0-12
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for LVA at DAL

All 12 models’ predicted scores

LVA — one dot per model DAL — one dot per model Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96
Vince Chambers
LVA 86.1–90.6 DAL 83.0–87.5 Overlap 1.38 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.5–90.2 DAL 83.4–87.1 Overlap 0.66 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.7–90.0 DAL 83.6–86.9 Overlap 0.19 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.9–89.8 DAL 83.8–86.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 3.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.0–89.7 DAL 83.9–86.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
20.14
p-value
5.68e-46

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
LVA 85.2–90.8 DAL 82.8–88.0 Overlap 2.78 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.4) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.7–90.4 DAL 83.2–87.6 Overlap 1.91 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.4) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.0–90.1 DAL 83.5–87.3 Overlap 1.35 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.4) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.2–89.8 DAL 83.7–87.1 Overlap 0.91 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.4) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.4–89.7 DAL 83.9–86.9 Overlap 0.55 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.4) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
14.09
p-value
6.32e-30

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
LVA 86.0–90.4 DAL 83.2–87.3 Overlap 1.29 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.3) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.3–90.1 DAL 83.6–87.0 Overlap 0.61 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.3) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.6–89.9 DAL 83.8–86.7 Overlap 0.16 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.3) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.8–89.7 DAL 83.9–86.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.3) — by 3.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.9–89.5 DAL 84.1–86.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.3) — by 3.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
20.22
p-value
5.74e-46

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin Tol Warning
LVA 86.6–91.6 DAL 82.8–87.0 Overlap 0.41 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 87.1–90.3 DAL 83.1–86.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.3–90.3 DAL 83.3–86.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.4–90.0 DAL 83.5–86.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.5–89.9 DAL 83.6–86.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
22.30
p-value
4.10e-50

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah Tol Warning
LVA 85.5–90.8 DAL 82.0–87.4 Overlap 1.94 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.8–90.0 DAL 82.4–87.0 Overlap 1.13 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.1–89.8 DAL 82.7–86.7 Overlap 0.62 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.5–89.6 DAL 82.9–86.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.6–89.4 DAL 83.1–86.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
16.11
p-value
2.69e-35

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
LVA 85.4–90.7 DAL 82.1–87.7 Overlap 2.34 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.8–90.3 DAL 82.5–87.2 Overlap 1.45 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.1–90.0 DAL 82.8–86.9 Overlap 0.88 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.3–89.8 DAL 83.0–86.7 Overlap 0.43 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.5–89.6 DAL 83.2–86.5 Overlap 0.06 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
16.71
p-value
4.72e-37

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
LVA 85.9–90.1 DAL 82.7–87.5 Overlap 1.56 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.2–89.8 DAL 83.1–87.1 Overlap 0.82 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.5–89.6 DAL 83.3–86.8 Overlap 0.35 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.6–89.4 DAL 83.5–86.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) — by 3.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.8–89.3 DAL 83.6–86.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) — by 3.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
19.10
p-value
4.30e-43

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
LVA 86.0–90.6 DAL 82.8–87.5 Overlap 1.53 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.4–90.2 DAL 83.2–87.1 Overlap 0.78 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.6–90.0 DAL 83.4–86.9 Overlap 0.29 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.8–89.8 DAL 83.6–86.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 3.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.9–89.7 DAL 83.8–86.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
19.53
p-value
2.01e-44

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
LVA 85.8–90.4 DAL 82.5–87.5 Overlap 1.64 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.2–90.0 DAL 82.9–87.1 Overlap 0.88 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.4–89.8 DAL 83.2–86.8 Overlap 0.38 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.6–89.6 DAL 83.4–86.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) — by 3.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.8–89.4 DAL 83.6–86.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.0) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
19.01
p-value
5.45e-43

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson Tol Warning
LVA 86.0–90.9 DAL 83.1–86.8 Overlap 0.79 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.3–89.6 DAL 83.6–86.4 Overlap 0.12 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.5–89.4 DAL 83.8–86.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.9 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.8–89.1 DAL 84.1–86.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.9 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.0–89.1 DAL 84.2–86.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
17.50
p-value
8.29e-39

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi Tol Warning
LVA 86.8–91.2 DAL 83.1–87.1 Overlap 0.31 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.1) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.9–89.8 DAL 83.4–86.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.1) — by 3.1 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.0–89.6 DAL 83.6–86.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.1) — by 3.1 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.0–89.5 DAL 83.7–86.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.1) — by 3.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.0–89.4 DAL 83.9–86.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.1) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
20.33
p-value
9.02e-46

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
LVA 85.5–90.4 DAL 83.3–88.3 Overlap 2.73 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.8) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.9–90.0 DAL 83.7–87.9 Overlap 1.93 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.8) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.2–89.8 DAL 83.9–87.6 Overlap 1.41 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.8) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.4–89.6 DAL 84.1–87.4 Overlap 1.01 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.8) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.6–89.4 DAL 84.3–87.2 Overlap 0.68 pts Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.8) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
13.07
p-value
4.10e-27

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — LVA at DAL — Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96
Level LVA range DAL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.1–90.6 83.0–87.5 1.38 pts — No
90% 86.5–90.2 83.4–87.1 0.66 pts — No
85% 86.7–90.0 83.6–86.9 0.19 pts — No
80% 86.9–89.8 83.8–86.7 — pts — No
75% 87.0–89.7 83.9–86.6 — pts — No
Reg — LVA at DAL — Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96
Level LVA range DAL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.2–90.8 82.8–88.0 2.78 pts — No
90% 85.7–90.4 83.2–87.6 1.91 pts — No
85% 86.0–90.1 83.5–87.3 1.35 pts — No
80% 86.2–89.8 83.7–87.1 0.91 pts — No
75% 86.4–89.7 83.9–86.9 0.55 pts — No
Dr. Wallace — LVA at DAL — Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96
Level LVA range DAL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.0–90.4 83.2–87.3 1.29 pts — No
90% 86.3–90.1 83.6–87.0 0.61 pts — No
85% 86.6–89.9 83.8–86.7 0.16 pts — No
80% 86.8–89.7 83.9–86.6 — pts — No
75% 86.9–89.5 84.1–86.4 — pts — No
Kevin — LVA at DAL — Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96
Level LVA range DAL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.6–91.6 82.8–87.0 0.41 pts Yes No
90% 87.1–90.3 83.1–86.7 — pts Yes No
85% 87.3–90.3 83.3–86.4 — pts Yes No
80% 87.4–90.0 83.5–86.3 — pts Yes No
75% 87.5–89.9 83.6–86.1 — pts Yes No
Dr. Lila Shah — LVA at DAL — Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96
Level LVA range DAL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.5–90.8 82.0–87.4 1.94 pts Yes No
90% 85.8–90.0 82.4–87.0 1.13 pts Yes No
85% 86.1–89.8 82.7–86.7 0.62 pts Yes No
80% 86.5–89.6 82.9–86.5 — pts Yes No
75% 86.6–89.4 83.1–86.3 — pts Yes No
Ice — LVA at DAL — Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96
Level LVA range DAL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.4–90.7 82.1–87.7 2.34 pts — No
90% 85.8–90.3 82.5–87.2 1.45 pts — No
85% 86.1–90.0 82.8–86.9 0.88 pts — No
80% 86.3–89.8 83.0–86.7 0.43 pts — No
75% 86.5–89.6 83.2–86.5 0.06 pts — No
Jamal — LVA at DAL — Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96
Level LVA range DAL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.9–90.1 82.7–87.5 1.56 pts — No
90% 86.2–89.8 83.1–87.1 0.82 pts — No
85% 86.5–89.6 83.3–86.8 0.35 pts — No
80% 86.6–89.4 83.5–86.6 — pts — No
75% 86.8–89.3 83.6–86.4 — pts — No
Jordan — LVA at DAL — Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96
Level LVA range DAL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.0–90.6 82.8–87.5 1.53 pts — No
90% 86.4–90.2 83.2–87.1 0.78 pts — No
85% 86.6–90.0 83.4–86.9 0.29 pts — No
80% 86.8–89.8 83.6–86.7 — pts — No
75% 86.9–89.7 83.8–86.5 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — LVA at DAL — Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96
Level LVA range DAL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.8–90.4 82.5–87.5 1.64 pts — No
90% 86.2–90.0 82.9–87.1 0.88 pts — No
85% 86.4–89.8 83.2–86.8 0.38 pts — No
80% 86.6–89.6 83.4–86.6 — pts — No
75% 86.8–89.4 83.6–86.5 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — LVA at DAL — Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96
Level LVA range DAL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.0–90.9 83.1–86.8 0.79 pts Yes No
90% 86.3–89.6 83.6–86.4 0.12 pts Yes No
85% 86.5–89.4 83.8–86.2 — pts Yes No
80% 86.8–89.1 84.1–86.2 — pts Yes No
75% 87.0–89.1 84.2–86.1 — pts Yes No
Lexi — LVA at DAL — Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96
Level LVA range DAL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.8–91.2 83.1–87.1 0.31 pts Yes No
90% 86.9–89.8 83.4–86.7 — pts Yes No
85% 87.0–89.6 83.6–86.5 — pts Yes No
80% 87.0–89.5 83.7–86.4 — pts Yes No
75% 87.0–89.4 83.9–86.2 — pts Yes No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — LVA at DAL — Actual: LVA 66, DAL 96
Level LVA range DAL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.5–90.4 83.3–88.3 2.73 pts — No
90% 85.9–90.0 83.7–87.9 1.93 pts — No
85% 86.2–89.8 83.9–87.6 1.41 pts — No
80% 86.4–89.6 84.1–87.4 1.01 pts — No
75% 86.6–89.4 84.3–87.2 0.68 pts — No