Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 17, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Seattle Storm at Portland Fire

SEA 89 – POR 94

June 17, 2026 · Final

Coach Sarah Watanabe

Best model for this game

Coach Sarah Watanabe
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for SEA at POR

All 12 models’ predicted scores

SEA — one dot per model POR — one dot per model Actual: SEA 89, POR 94
Vince Chambers
SEA 76.9–81.5 POR 79.2–83.0 Overlap 2.31 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.3–81.1 POR 79.5–82.7 Overlap 1.63 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.5–80.9 POR 79.7–82.5 Overlap 1.2 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.7–80.7 POR 79.8–82.3 Overlap 0.86 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 1.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 77.9–80.5 POR 80.0–82.2 Overlap 0.58 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 1.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
-12.91
p-value
2.22e-26

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
SEA 77.1–81.5 POR 78.7–83.6 Overlap 2.85 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.4–81.2 POR 79.1–83.2 Overlap 2.09 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.7–80.9 POR 79.3–82.9 Overlap 1.6 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.8–80.8 POR 79.5–82.7 Overlap 1.22 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.0–80.6 POR 79.7–82.6 Overlap 0.91 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
-11.33
p-value
3.64e-22

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
SEA 77.5–81.3 POR 78.7–83.3 Overlap 2.56 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.8–81.0 POR 79.1–83.0 Overlap 1.88 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.0–80.8 POR 79.3–82.7 Overlap 1.43 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.1–80.6 POR 79.5–82.5 Overlap 1.09 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.2–80.5 POR 79.7–82.4 Overlap 0.81 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 1.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
-11.38
p-value
3.54e-22

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
SEA 77.6–81.5 POR 79.4–83.1 Overlap 2.13 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.9–81.2 POR 79.7–82.8 Overlap 1.51 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.1–81.0 POR 79.9–82.6 Overlap 1.11 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.3–80.8 POR 80.0–82.5 Overlap 0.8 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 1.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 78.4–80.7 POR 80.1–82.3 Overlap 0.55 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 1.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
-12.84
p-value
2.27e-26

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
SEA 77.6–81.9 POR 78.8–83.5 Overlap 3.11 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.8) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

SEA 78.0–81.5 POR 79.1–83.1 Overlap 2.39 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.8) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.2–81.3 POR 79.4–82.8 Overlap 1.92 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.8) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.4–81.1 POR 79.6–82.7 Overlap 1.56 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.8) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.5–81.0 POR 79.7–82.5 Overlap 1.26 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.8) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
-8.78
p-value
2.62e-15

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
SEA 77.4–81.5 POR 79.0–83.2 Overlap 2.56 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.7–81.2 POR 79.3–82.9 Overlap 1.88 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.9–81.0 POR 79.5–82.7 Overlap 1.44 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.1–80.8 POR 79.7–82.5 Overlap 1.1 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.2–80.7 POR 79.8–82.4 Overlap 0.82 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 1.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
-11.34
p-value
3.12e-22

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
SEA 77.3–81.2 POR 78.8–83.5 Overlap 2.42 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.7–80.9 POR 79.2–83.1 Overlap 1.73 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.9–80.7 POR 79.4–82.9 Overlap 1.28 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.0–80.6 POR 79.6–82.7 Overlap 0.94 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 78.1–80.4 POR 79.8–82.5 Overlap 0.65 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
-12.54
p-value
2.28e-25

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan Tol Warning
SEA 77.2–80.9 POR 79.0–82.9 Overlap 1.94 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.8–80.7 POR 79.3–82.5 Overlap 1.43 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.9–80.4 POR 79.5–82.3 Overlap 0.93 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 1.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 78.3–80.2 POR 79.7–82.2 Overlap 0.49 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 1.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 78.4–80.0 POR 79.8–82.1 Overlap 0.25 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 1.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
-12.38
p-value
4.75e-25

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
SEA 77.0–81.6 POR 78.7–83.1 Overlap 2.83 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.4–81.2 POR 79.1–82.7 Overlap 2.11 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.6–81.0 POR 79.3–82.5 Overlap 1.64 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.8–80.8 POR 79.5–82.3 Overlap 1.28 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.9–80.6 POR 79.6–82.2 Overlap 0.99 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
-10.58
p-value
3.82e-20

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson Tol Warning
SEA 77.4–81.2 POR 79.5–83.3 Overlap 1.72 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.7–80.9 POR 79.8–82.8 Overlap 1.16 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.9–80.7 POR 79.8–82.5 Overlap 0.93 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 78.1–80.6 POR 80.0–82.4 Overlap 0.59 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 78.2–80.4 POR 80.2–82.2 Overlap 0.24 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
-12.78
p-value
4.49e-26

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
SEA 77.3–81.3 POR 79.2–83.1 Overlap 2.12 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.6–81.0 POR 79.5–82.8 Overlap 1.48 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.8–80.8 POR 79.7–82.6 Overlap 1.06 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.0–80.6 POR 79.9–82.4 Overlap 0.74 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 78.1–80.5 POR 80.0–82.3 Overlap 0.48 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
-13.48
p-value
3.78e-28

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe Tol Warning
SEA 76.3–80.8 POR 77.6–82.9 Overlap 3.25 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 78.3) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

SEA 76.6–80.4 POR 78.0–82.4 Overlap 2.42 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 78.3) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 76.9–80.1 POR 78.3–82.2 Overlap 1.8 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 78.3) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.0–79.8 POR 78.5–81.9 Overlap 1.32 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 78.3) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.2–79.2 POR 78.7–81.8 Overlap 0.49 pts Actual: SEA 89, POR 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Portland Fire (avg. 80.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 78.3) — by 1.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
-11.33
p-value
3.74e-22

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — SEA at POR — Actual: SEA 89, POR 94
Level SEA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 76.9–81.5 79.2–83.0 2.31 pts — No
90% 77.3–81.1 79.5–82.7 1.63 pts — No
85% 77.5–80.9 79.7–82.5 1.2 pts — No
80% 77.7–80.7 79.8–82.3 0.86 pts — No
75% 77.9–80.5 80.0–82.2 0.58 pts — No
Reg — SEA at POR — Actual: SEA 89, POR 94
Level SEA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.1–81.5 78.7–83.6 2.85 pts — No
90% 77.4–81.2 79.1–83.2 2.09 pts — No
85% 77.7–80.9 79.3–82.9 1.6 pts — No
80% 77.8–80.8 79.5–82.7 1.22 pts — No
75% 78.0–80.6 79.7–82.6 0.91 pts — No
Dr. Wallace — SEA at POR — Actual: SEA 89, POR 94
Level SEA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.5–81.3 78.7–83.3 2.56 pts — No
90% 77.8–81.0 79.1–83.0 1.88 pts — No
85% 78.0–80.8 79.3–82.7 1.43 pts — No
80% 78.1–80.6 79.5–82.5 1.09 pts — No
75% 78.2–80.5 79.7–82.4 0.81 pts — No
Kevin — SEA at POR — Actual: SEA 89, POR 94
Level SEA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.6–81.5 79.4–83.1 2.13 pts — No
90% 77.9–81.2 79.7–82.8 1.51 pts — No
85% 78.1–81.0 79.9–82.6 1.11 pts — No
80% 78.3–80.8 80.0–82.5 0.8 pts — No
75% 78.4–80.7 80.1–82.3 0.55 pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — SEA at POR — Actual: SEA 89, POR 94
Level SEA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.6–81.9 78.8–83.5 3.11 pts — No
90% 78.0–81.5 79.1–83.1 2.39 pts — No
85% 78.2–81.3 79.4–82.8 1.92 pts — No
80% 78.4–81.1 79.6–82.7 1.56 pts — No
75% 78.5–81.0 79.7–82.5 1.26 pts — No
Ice — SEA at POR — Actual: SEA 89, POR 94
Level SEA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.4–81.5 79.0–83.2 2.56 pts — No
90% 77.7–81.2 79.3–82.9 1.88 pts — No
85% 77.9–81.0 79.5–82.7 1.44 pts — No
80% 78.1–80.8 79.7–82.5 1.1 pts — No
75% 78.2–80.7 79.8–82.4 0.82 pts — No
Jamal — SEA at POR — Actual: SEA 89, POR 94
Level SEA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.3–81.2 78.8–83.5 2.42 pts — No
90% 77.7–80.9 79.2–83.1 1.73 pts — No
85% 77.9–80.7 79.4–82.9 1.28 pts — No
80% 78.0–80.6 79.6–82.7 0.94 pts — No
75% 78.1–80.4 79.8–82.5 0.65 pts — No
Jordan — SEA at POR — Actual: SEA 89, POR 94
Level SEA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.2–80.9 79.0–82.9 1.94 pts Yes No
90% 77.8–80.7 79.3–82.5 1.43 pts Yes No
85% 77.9–80.4 79.5–82.3 0.93 pts Yes No
80% 78.3–80.2 79.7–82.2 0.49 pts Yes No
75% 78.4–80.0 79.8–82.1 0.25 pts Yes No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — SEA at POR — Actual: SEA 89, POR 94
Level SEA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.0–81.6 78.7–83.1 2.83 pts — No
90% 77.4–81.2 79.1–82.7 2.11 pts — No
85% 77.6–81.0 79.3–82.5 1.64 pts — No
80% 77.8–80.8 79.5–82.3 1.28 pts — No
75% 77.9–80.6 79.6–82.2 0.99 pts — No
Maya Jefferson — SEA at POR — Actual: SEA 89, POR 94
Level SEA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.4–81.2 79.5–83.3 1.72 pts Yes No
90% 77.7–80.9 79.8–82.8 1.16 pts Yes No
85% 77.9–80.7 79.8–82.5 0.93 pts Yes No
80% 78.1–80.6 80.0–82.4 0.59 pts Yes No
75% 78.2–80.4 80.2–82.2 0.24 pts Yes No
Lexi — SEA at POR — Actual: SEA 89, POR 94
Level SEA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.3–81.3 79.2–83.1 2.12 pts — No
90% 77.6–81.0 79.5–82.8 1.48 pts — No
85% 77.8–80.8 79.7–82.6 1.06 pts — No
80% 78.0–80.6 79.9–82.4 0.74 pts — No
75% 78.1–80.5 80.0–82.3 0.48 pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — SEA at POR — Actual: SEA 89, POR 94
Level SEA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 76.3–80.8 77.6–82.9 3.25 pts Yes No
90% 76.6–80.4 78.0–82.4 2.42 pts Yes No
85% 76.9–80.1 78.3–82.2 1.8 pts Yes No
80% 77.0–79.8 78.5–81.9 1.32 pts Yes No
75% 77.2–79.2 78.7–81.8 0.49 pts Yes No