Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 18, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Atlanta Dream at Indiana Fever

ATL 108 – IND 101

June 18, 2026 · Final

Reg

Best model for this game

Reg
All models: 0-12
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for ATL at IND

All 12 models’ predicted scores

ATL — one dot per model IND — one dot per model Actual: ATL 108, IND 101
Vince Chambers
ATL 82.7–86.9 IND 84.9–88.8 Overlap 2.03 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.8) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.0–86.6 IND 85.2–88.4 Overlap 1.38 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.8) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.3–86.3 IND 85.4–88.2 Overlap 0.96 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.8) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 2.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.4–86.2 IND 85.5–88.1 Overlap 0.63 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.8) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 2.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.6–86.0 IND 85.7–88.0 Overlap 0.36 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.8) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 2.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
-14.38
p-value
1.44e-30

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg Tol Warning
ATL 82.5–87.4 IND 84.8–88.6 Overlap 2.53 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 82.9–87.0 IND 85.0–87.9 Overlap 1.99 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.1–86.7 IND 85.1–87.9 Overlap 1.64 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.3–86.5 IND 85.2–87.9 Overlap 1.29 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.5–86.4 IND 85.3–87.8 Overlap 1.01 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
-10.22
p-value
3.44e-19

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
ATL 82.7–86.7 IND 84.8–88.8 Overlap 1.93 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.8) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.0–86.4 IND 85.1–88.4 Overlap 1.29 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.8) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.2–86.2 IND 85.3–88.2 Overlap 0.87 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.8) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.4–86.0 IND 85.4–88.1 Overlap 0.54 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.8) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.5–85.9 IND 85.6–87.9 Overlap 0.27 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.8) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
-15.00
p-value
2.62e-32

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin Tol Warning
ATL 83.0–86.7 IND 85.1–88.1 Overlap 1.61 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.3–86.4 IND 85.9–88.0 Overlap 0.5 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 2.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.5–86.2 IND 86.0–87.9 Overlap 0.22 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 2.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.6–86.1 IND 86.1–87.8 No overlap Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 2.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.7–85.9 IND 86.2–87.6 No overlap Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 2.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
-16.55
p-value
1.98e-36

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
ATL 81.9–87.5 IND 84.3–88.8 Overlap 3.2 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

ATL 82.3–87.0 IND 84.7–88.5 Overlap 2.39 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 82.6–86.8 IND 84.9–88.2 Overlap 1.86 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 82.9–86.5 IND 85.1–88.0 Overlap 1.45 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.0–86.3 IND 85.2–87.9 Overlap 1.11 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
-10.61
p-value
4.63e-20

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice Tol Warning
ATL 82.9–86.6 IND 84.5–88.8 Overlap 2.06 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.3–86.2 IND 84.9–88.4 Overlap 1.31 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.5–86.1 IND 85.1–88.2 Overlap 0.99 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.6–86.0 IND 85.3–88.0 Overlap 0.75 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.8–85.8 IND 85.4–87.9 Overlap 0.46 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
-11.82
p-value
1.76e-23

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
ATL 82.5–86.8 IND 84.8–88.9 Overlap 2.06 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 82.9–86.5 IND 85.1–88.6 Overlap 1.38 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.1–86.3 IND 85.3–88.4 Overlap 0.94 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.3–86.1 IND 85.5–88.2 Overlap 0.6 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.4–86.0 IND 85.6–88.1 Overlap 0.32 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
-14.78
p-value
1.02e-31

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
ATL 82.5–86.8 IND 84.3–89.1 Overlap 2.5 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 82.8–86.5 IND 84.7–88.7 Overlap 1.76 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.0–86.3 IND 85.0–88.5 Overlap 1.28 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.2–86.1 IND 85.2–88.3 Overlap 0.92 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.4–85.9 IND 85.3–88.1 Overlap 0.61 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 2.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
-13.12
p-value
4.27e-27

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin Tol Warning
ATL 82.9–86.5 IND 84.7–87.9 Overlap 1.74 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.2–86.2 IND 84.8–87.8 Overlap 1.33 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.4–86.0 IND 85.1–87.5 Overlap 0.91 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.5–85.8 IND 85.3–87.4 Overlap 0.57 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.6–85.7 IND 85.5–87.4 Overlap 0.24 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
-14.18
p-value
4.83e-30

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson Tol Warning
ATL 83.2–85.7 IND 84.6–88.6 Overlap 1.12 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.4–85.7 IND 84.9–88.3 Overlap 0.8 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.7–85.7 IND 85.1–88.1 Overlap 0.53 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.9–85.6 IND 85.3–87.9 Overlap 0.26 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 84.0–85.5 IND 85.4–87.8 Overlap 0.11 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
-15.68
p-value
1.05e-33

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
ATL 82.6–86.6 IND 84.7–88.6 Overlap 1.94 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.0–86.3 IND 85.0–88.3 Overlap 1.31 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.2–86.1 IND 85.2–88.1 Overlap 0.9 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.3–85.9 IND 85.3–87.9 Overlap 0.58 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.5–85.8 IND 85.5–87.8 Overlap 0.31 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
-14.68
p-value
1.91e-31

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
ATL 82.3–86.6 IND 83.6–88.9 Overlap 2.99 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.3) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.4) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 82.7–86.2 IND 84.0–88.5 Overlap 2.21 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.3) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.4) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 82.9–86.0 IND 84.3–88.2 Overlap 1.71 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.3) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.4) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.1–85.8 IND 84.5–88.0 Overlap 1.32 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.3) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.4) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 83.2–85.7 IND 84.7–87.8 Overlap 1.0 pts Actual: ATL 108, IND 101

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.3) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.4) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
-10.86
p-value
1.09e-20

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — ATL at IND — Actual: ATL 108, IND 101
Level ATL range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.7–86.9 84.9–88.8 2.03 pts — No
90% 83.0–86.6 85.2–88.4 1.38 pts — No
85% 83.3–86.3 85.4–88.2 0.96 pts — No
80% 83.4–86.2 85.5–88.1 0.63 pts — No
75% 83.6–86.0 85.7–88.0 0.36 pts — No
Reg — ATL at IND — Actual: ATL 108, IND 101
Level ATL range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.5–87.4 84.8–88.6 2.53 pts Yes No
90% 82.9–87.0 85.0–87.9 1.99 pts Yes No
85% 83.1–86.7 85.1–87.9 1.64 pts Yes No
80% 83.3–86.5 85.2–87.9 1.29 pts Yes No
75% 83.5–86.4 85.3–87.8 1.01 pts Yes No
Dr. Wallace — ATL at IND — Actual: ATL 108, IND 101
Level ATL range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.7–86.7 84.8–88.8 1.93 pts — No
90% 83.0–86.4 85.1–88.4 1.29 pts — No
85% 83.2–86.2 85.3–88.2 0.87 pts — No
80% 83.4–86.0 85.4–88.1 0.54 pts — No
75% 83.5–85.9 85.6–87.9 0.27 pts — No
Kevin — ATL at IND — Actual: ATL 108, IND 101
Level ATL range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.0–86.7 85.1–88.1 1.61 pts Yes No
90% 83.3–86.4 85.9–88.0 0.5 pts Yes No
85% 83.5–86.2 86.0–87.9 0.22 pts Yes No
80% 83.6–86.1 86.1–87.8 — pts Yes No
75% 83.7–85.9 86.2–87.6 — pts Yes No
Dr. Lila Shah — ATL at IND — Actual: ATL 108, IND 101
Level ATL range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.9–87.5 84.3–88.8 3.2 pts — No
90% 82.3–87.0 84.7–88.5 2.39 pts — No
85% 82.6–86.8 84.9–88.2 1.86 pts — No
80% 82.9–86.5 85.1–88.0 1.45 pts — No
75% 83.0–86.3 85.2–87.9 1.11 pts — No
Ice — ATL at IND — Actual: ATL 108, IND 101
Level ATL range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.9–86.6 84.5–88.8 2.06 pts Yes No
90% 83.3–86.2 84.9–88.4 1.31 pts Yes No
85% 83.5–86.1 85.1–88.2 0.99 pts Yes No
80% 83.6–86.0 85.3–88.0 0.75 pts Yes No
75% 83.8–85.8 85.4–87.9 0.46 pts Yes No
Jamal — ATL at IND — Actual: ATL 108, IND 101
Level ATL range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.5–86.8 84.8–88.9 2.06 pts — No
90% 82.9–86.5 85.1–88.6 1.38 pts — No
85% 83.1–86.3 85.3–88.4 0.94 pts — No
80% 83.3–86.1 85.5–88.2 0.6 pts — No
75% 83.4–86.0 85.6–88.1 0.32 pts — No
Jordan — ATL at IND — Actual: ATL 108, IND 101
Level ATL range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.5–86.8 84.3–89.1 2.5 pts — No
90% 82.8–86.5 84.7–88.7 1.76 pts — No
85% 83.0–86.3 85.0–88.5 1.28 pts — No
80% 83.2–86.1 85.2–88.3 0.92 pts — No
75% 83.4–85.9 85.3–88.1 0.61 pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — ATL at IND — Actual: ATL 108, IND 101
Level ATL range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.9–86.5 84.7–87.9 1.74 pts Yes No
90% 83.2–86.2 84.8–87.8 1.33 pts Yes No
85% 83.4–86.0 85.1–87.5 0.91 pts Yes No
80% 83.5–85.8 85.3–87.4 0.57 pts Yes No
75% 83.6–85.7 85.5–87.4 0.24 pts Yes No
Maya Jefferson — ATL at IND — Actual: ATL 108, IND 101
Level ATL range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.2–85.7 84.6–88.6 1.12 pts Yes No
90% 83.4–85.7 84.9–88.3 0.8 pts Yes No
85% 83.7–85.7 85.1–88.1 0.53 pts Yes No
80% 83.9–85.6 85.3–87.9 0.26 pts Yes No
75% 84.0–85.5 85.4–87.8 0.11 pts Yes No
Lexi — ATL at IND — Actual: ATL 108, IND 101
Level ATL range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.6–86.6 84.7–88.6 1.94 pts — No
90% 83.0–86.3 85.0–88.3 1.31 pts — No
85% 83.2–86.1 85.2–88.1 0.9 pts — No
80% 83.3–85.9 85.3–87.9 0.58 pts — No
75% 83.5–85.8 85.5–87.8 0.31 pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — ATL at IND — Actual: ATL 108, IND 101
Level ATL range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.3–86.6 83.6–88.9 2.99 pts — No
90% 82.7–86.2 84.0–88.5 2.21 pts — No
85% 82.9–86.0 84.3–88.2 1.71 pts — No
80% 83.1–85.8 84.5–88.0 1.32 pts — No
75% 83.2–85.7 84.7–87.8 1.0 pts — No