Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 20, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Indiana Fever at Atlanta Dream

IND 96 – ATL 113

June 20, 2026 · Final

Coach Sarah Watanabe

Best model for this game

Coach Sarah Watanabe
All models: 0-12
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for IND at ATL

All 12 models’ predicted scores

IND — one dot per model ATL — one dot per model Actual: IND 96, ATL 113
Vince Chambers
IND 84.6–88.7 ATL 82.9–86.9 Overlap 2.27 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.9–88.4 ATL 83.2–86.6 Overlap 1.62 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.2–88.2 ATL 83.4–86.3 Overlap 1.19 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.3–88.0 ATL 83.6–86.2 Overlap 0.86 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 85.5–87.9 ATL 83.7–86.1 Overlap 0.59 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
12.73
p-value
5.35e-26

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
IND 84.1–89.0 ATL 82.4–87.5 Overlap 3.43 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.0) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 84.5–88.6 ATL 82.8–87.1 Overlap 2.62 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.0) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.8–88.4 ATL 83.1–86.9 Overlap 2.09 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.0) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.0–88.2 ATL 83.3–86.7 Overlap 1.69 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.0) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.1–88.0 ATL 83.5–86.5 Overlap 1.35 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.0) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
9.12
p-value
3.41e-16

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace Tol Warning
IND 84.4–88.3 ATL 82.5–86.9 Overlap 2.53 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.5–88.0 ATL 82.8–86.6 Overlap 2.04 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.7–87.6 ATL 83.1–86.3 Overlap 1.62 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.8–87.6 ATL 83.2–86.2 Overlap 1.38 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.2–87.4 ATL 83.4–86.0 Overlap 0.79 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
10.90
p-value
5.66e-21

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
IND 84.6–88.8 ATL 82.8–87.6 Overlap 2.94 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.2) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.0–88.4 ATL 83.1–87.2 Overlap 2.22 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.2) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.2–88.2 ATL 83.4–86.9 Overlap 1.75 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.2) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.4–88.1 ATL 83.6–86.7 Overlap 1.39 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.2) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.5–87.9 ATL 83.8–86.6 Overlap 1.09 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.7) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.2) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
9.84
p-value
5.01e-18

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah Tol Warning
IND 84.5–87.9 ATL 82.0–86.8 Overlap 2.26 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.3) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.4) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.6–87.7 ATL 82.4–86.4 Overlap 1.78 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.3) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.4) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.7–87.6 ATL 82.6–86.1 Overlap 1.4 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.3) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.4) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.8–87.6 ATL 82.8–86.0 Overlap 1.15 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.3) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.4) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.0–87.5 ATL 83.0–85.8 Overlap 0.79 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.3) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.4) — by 1.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
11.50
p-value
1.32e-22

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
IND 84.3–88.7 ATL 82.7–86.7 Overlap 2.43 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.6–88.3 ATL 83.1–86.4 Overlap 1.76 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.9–88.1 ATL 83.3–86.2 Overlap 1.33 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.1–87.9 ATL 83.4–86.0 Overlap 0.99 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 85.2–87.8 ATL 83.6–85.9 Overlap 0.71 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
11.99
p-value
6.72e-24

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
IND 84.6–88.5 ATL 82.7–86.9 Overlap 2.29 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.9–88.2 ATL 83.1–86.5 Overlap 1.64 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.1–88.0 ATL 83.3–86.3 Overlap 1.22 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.3–87.8 ATL 83.4–86.2 Overlap 0.89 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 85.4–87.7 ATL 83.6–86.0 Overlap 0.62 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
12.45
p-value
3.25e-25

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
IND 84.6–88.6 ATL 82.9–86.7 Overlap 2.03 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.9–88.3 ATL 83.2–86.4 Overlap 1.41 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.2–88.1 ATL 83.4–86.2 Overlap 1.0 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.3–87.9 ATL 83.5–86.0 Overlap 0.69 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

IND 85.4–87.8 ATL 83.7–85.9 Overlap 0.43 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
13.68
p-value
1.43e-28

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
IND 84.3–88.4 ATL 82.7–87.0 Overlap 2.74 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.6–88.1 ATL 83.1–86.7 Overlap 2.05 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.8–87.9 ATL 83.3–86.4 Overlap 1.61 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.0–87.7 ATL 83.4–86.3 Overlap 1.26 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.1–87.6 ATL 83.6–86.1 Overlap 0.98 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.4) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.8) — by 1.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
10.23
p-value
3.58e-19

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
IND 84.4–88.7 ATL 82.7–87.0 Overlap 2.59 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.8–88.4 ATL 83.1–86.7 Overlap 1.9 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.0–88.2 ATL 83.3–86.5 Overlap 1.45 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.2–88.0 ATL 83.5–86.3 Overlap 1.11 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.3–87.8 ATL 83.6–86.1 Overlap 0.82 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.6) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.9) — by 1.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
11.38
p-value
2.78e-22

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
IND 84.1–88.8 ATL 82.5–87.0 Overlap 2.85 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.5–88.5 ATL 82.8–86.6 Overlap 2.11 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.8–88.2 ATL 83.1–86.4 Overlap 1.63 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.9–88.0 ATL 83.2–86.2 Overlap 1.26 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 85.1–87.9 ATL 83.4–86.0 Overlap 0.95 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 86.5) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
10.98
p-value
3.51e-21

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe Tol Warning
IND 84.2–88.0 ATL 82.2–87.2 Overlap 2.97 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 85.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.4–87.3 ATL 82.6–86.8 Overlap 2.37 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 85.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.6–87.0 ATL 82.8–86.5 Overlap 1.93 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 85.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.7–86.9 ATL 83.0–86.3 Overlap 1.59 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 85.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 84.8–86.8 ATL 83.2–86.1 Overlap 1.34 pts Actual: IND 96, ATL 113

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 85.9) over Atlanta Dream (avg. 84.7) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
7.16
p-value
2.86e-11

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — IND at ATL — Actual: IND 96, ATL 113
Level IND range ATL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–88.7 82.9–86.9 2.27 pts — No
90% 84.9–88.4 83.2–86.6 1.62 pts — No
85% 85.2–88.2 83.4–86.3 1.19 pts — No
80% 85.3–88.0 83.6–86.2 0.86 pts — No
75% 85.5–87.9 83.7–86.1 0.59 pts — No
Reg — IND at ATL — Actual: IND 96, ATL 113
Level IND range ATL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.1–89.0 82.4–87.5 3.43 pts — No
90% 84.5–88.6 82.8–87.1 2.62 pts — No
85% 84.8–88.4 83.1–86.9 2.09 pts — No
80% 85.0–88.2 83.3–86.7 1.69 pts — No
75% 85.1–88.0 83.5–86.5 1.35 pts — No
Dr. Wallace — IND at ATL — Actual: IND 96, ATL 113
Level IND range ATL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.4–88.3 82.5–86.9 2.53 pts Yes No
90% 84.5–88.0 82.8–86.6 2.04 pts Yes No
85% 84.7–87.6 83.1–86.3 1.62 pts Yes No
80% 84.8–87.6 83.2–86.2 1.38 pts Yes No
75% 85.2–87.4 83.4–86.0 0.79 pts Yes No
Kevin — IND at ATL — Actual: IND 96, ATL 113
Level IND range ATL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–88.8 82.8–87.6 2.94 pts — No
90% 85.0–88.4 83.1–87.2 2.22 pts — No
85% 85.2–88.2 83.4–86.9 1.75 pts — No
80% 85.4–88.1 83.6–86.7 1.39 pts — No
75% 85.5–87.9 83.8–86.6 1.09 pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — IND at ATL — Actual: IND 96, ATL 113
Level IND range ATL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.5–87.9 82.0–86.8 2.26 pts Yes No
90% 84.6–87.7 82.4–86.4 1.78 pts Yes No
85% 84.7–87.6 82.6–86.1 1.4 pts Yes No
80% 84.8–87.6 82.8–86.0 1.15 pts Yes No
75% 85.0–87.5 83.0–85.8 0.79 pts Yes No
Ice — IND at ATL — Actual: IND 96, ATL 113
Level IND range ATL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.3–88.7 82.7–86.7 2.43 pts — No
90% 84.6–88.3 83.1–86.4 1.76 pts — No
85% 84.9–88.1 83.3–86.2 1.33 pts — No
80% 85.1–87.9 83.4–86.0 0.99 pts — No
75% 85.2–87.8 83.6–85.9 0.71 pts — No
Jamal — IND at ATL — Actual: IND 96, ATL 113
Level IND range ATL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–88.5 82.7–86.9 2.29 pts — No
90% 84.9–88.2 83.1–86.5 1.64 pts — No
85% 85.1–88.0 83.3–86.3 1.22 pts — No
80% 85.3–87.8 83.4–86.2 0.89 pts — No
75% 85.4–87.7 83.6–86.0 0.62 pts — No
Jordan — IND at ATL — Actual: IND 96, ATL 113
Level IND range ATL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–88.6 82.9–86.7 2.03 pts — No
90% 84.9–88.3 83.2–86.4 1.41 pts — No
85% 85.2–88.1 83.4–86.2 1.0 pts — No
80% 85.3–87.9 83.5–86.0 0.69 pts — No
75% 85.4–87.8 83.7–85.9 0.43 pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — IND at ATL — Actual: IND 96, ATL 113
Level IND range ATL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.3–88.4 82.7–87.0 2.74 pts — No
90% 84.6–88.1 83.1–86.7 2.05 pts — No
85% 84.8–87.9 83.3–86.4 1.61 pts — No
80% 85.0–87.7 83.4–86.3 1.26 pts — No
75% 85.1–87.6 83.6–86.1 0.98 pts — No
Maya Jefferson — IND at ATL — Actual: IND 96, ATL 113
Level IND range ATL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.4–88.7 82.7–87.0 2.59 pts — No
90% 84.8–88.4 83.1–86.7 1.9 pts — No
85% 85.0–88.2 83.3–86.5 1.45 pts — No
80% 85.2–88.0 83.5–86.3 1.11 pts — No
75% 85.3–87.8 83.6–86.1 0.82 pts — No
Lexi — IND at ATL — Actual: IND 96, ATL 113
Level IND range ATL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.1–88.8 82.5–87.0 2.85 pts — No
90% 84.5–88.5 82.8–86.6 2.11 pts — No
85% 84.8–88.2 83.1–86.4 1.63 pts — No
80% 84.9–88.0 83.2–86.2 1.26 pts — No
75% 85.1–87.9 83.4–86.0 0.95 pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — IND at ATL — Actual: IND 96, ATL 113
Level IND range ATL range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.2–88.0 82.2–87.2 2.97 pts Yes No
90% 84.4–87.3 82.6–86.8 2.37 pts Yes No
85% 84.6–87.0 82.8–86.5 1.93 pts Yes No
80% 84.7–86.9 83.0–86.3 1.59 pts Yes No
75% 84.8–86.8 83.2–86.1 1.34 pts Yes No