Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 25, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Dallas Wings at Las Vegas Aces

DAL 84 – LVA 99

June 25, 2026 · Final

Dr. Lila Shah

Best model for this game

Dr. Lila Shah
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for DAL at LVA

All 12 models’ predicted scores

DAL — one dot per model LVA — one dot per model Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99
Vince Chambers Tol Warning
DAL 83.2–87.1 LVA 85.8–90.4 Overlap 1.28 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 83.5–86.8 LVA 86.5–89.8 Overlap 0.32 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.7–86.6 LVA 86.8–89.6 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.9–86.4 LVA 86.8–88.9 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 84.0–86.3 LVA 87.0–88.7 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
-18.25
p-value
3.62e-40

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg Tol Warning
DAL 83.4–87.4 LVA 86.1–89.8 Overlap 1.24 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 83.5–87.1 LVA 86.6–89.5 Overlap 0.55 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.6–86.8 LVA 86.8–89.3 Overlap 0.05 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.8–86.7 LVA 86.8–89.1 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.8 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 84.1–86.4 LVA 87.0–88.9 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Dallas Wings (avg. 85.2) — by 2.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
-16.44
p-value
9.57e-36

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace Tol Warning
DAL 82.0–87.5 LVA 85.7–89.3 Overlap 1.77 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.4–87.0 LVA 86.7–89.0 Overlap 0.31 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.7–86.7 LVA 86.9–88.9 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.1 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.0–86.5 LVA 86.9–88.8 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.1–86.3 LVA 87.1–88.8 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
-18.67
p-value
3.53e-40

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
DAL 82.2–87.3 LVA 85.5–90.9 Overlap 1.77 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.6–86.9 LVA 85.9–90.5 Overlap 0.93 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.9–86.6 LVA 86.2–90.2 Overlap 0.38 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.1–86.4 LVA 86.4–90.0 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.3–86.2 LVA 86.6–89.8 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
-18.90
p-value
4.21e-42

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
DAL 82.0–86.8 LVA 85.2–90.8 Overlap 1.62 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.4–86.4 LVA 85.6–90.3 Overlap 0.78 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.6–86.1 LVA 85.9–90.0 Overlap 0.24 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.8–85.9 LVA 86.1–89.8 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.0–85.8 LVA 86.3–89.6 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
-19.66
p-value
1.20e-43

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice Tol Warning
DAL 82.3–86.5 LVA 85.9–90.5 Overlap 0.59 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.7–86.2 LVA 86.1–90.0 Overlap 0.05 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.9–86.0 LVA 86.2–89.7 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.3 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.1–85.8 LVA 86.3–89.4 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.2–85.7 LVA 86.6–89.0 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.7) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
-19.54
p-value
8.88e-43

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
DAL 82.6–87.0 LVA 84.9–90.7 Overlap 2.14 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.9–86.7 LVA 85.4–90.2 Overlap 1.31 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 83.1–86.4 LVA 85.7–89.9 Overlap 0.77 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.3–86.3 LVA 85.9–89.7 Overlap 0.36 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.5–86.1 LVA 86.1–89.5 Overlap 0.02 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
-16.58
p-value
1.79e-35

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
DAL 82.2–87.2 LVA 85.5–90.4 Overlap 1.7 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.6–86.8 LVA 85.9–90.0 Overlap 0.9 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.9–86.6 LVA 86.2–89.7 Overlap 0.38 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.1–86.3 LVA 86.4–89.5 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.2–86.2 LVA 86.5–89.4 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.7) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
-18.86
p-value
4.66e-42

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin Tol Warning
DAL 83.0–86.4 LVA 85.7–90.2 Overlap 0.65 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.2–86.2 LVA 86.1–89.9 Overlap 0.12 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.3–85.9 LVA 86.3–89.6 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) — by 3.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.5–85.8 LVA 86.5–89.4 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) — by 3.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.6–85.6 LVA 86.6–89.3 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.6) — by 3.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
-20.83
p-value
7.10e-47

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
DAL 82.2–87.4 LVA 85.1–90.4 Overlap 2.29 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.6–87.0 LVA 85.5–90.0 Overlap 1.45 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.9–86.7 LVA 85.8–89.7 Overlap 0.9 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.1–86.5 LVA 86.0–89.5 Overlap 0.48 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.3–86.3 LVA 86.2–89.3 Overlap 0.12 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.8) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
-16.11
p-value
5.21e-35

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi Tol Warning
DAL 82.4–86.5 LVA 85.5–90.3 Overlap 0.94 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.7–86.1 LVA 86.0–90.2 Overlap 0.15 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 82.9–85.9 LVA 86.1–89.1 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.1–85.8 LVA 86.3–88.9 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

DAL 83.2–85.6 LVA 86.5–88.7 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.4) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
-18.43
p-value
1.59e-39

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
DAL 82.5–87.2 LVA 85.3–90.7 Overlap 1.94 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 82.9–86.8 LVA 85.7–90.2 Overlap 1.13 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 83.1–86.6 LVA 86.0–89.9 Overlap 0.6 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.3–86.4 LVA 86.2–89.7 Overlap 0.19 pts Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 83.5–86.2 LVA 86.4–89.5 No overlap Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Dallas Wings (avg. 84.9) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
-17.56
p-value
1.77e-38

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — DAL at LVA — Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99
Level DAL range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.2–87.1 85.8–90.4 1.28 pts Yes No
90% 83.5–86.8 86.5–89.8 0.32 pts Yes No
85% 83.7–86.6 86.8–89.6 — pts Yes No
80% 83.9–86.4 86.8–88.9 — pts Yes No
75% 84.0–86.3 87.0–88.7 — pts Yes No
Reg — DAL at LVA — Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99
Level DAL range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.4–87.4 86.1–89.8 1.24 pts Yes No
90% 83.5–87.1 86.6–89.5 0.55 pts Yes No
85% 83.6–86.8 86.8–89.3 0.05 pts Yes No
80% 83.8–86.7 86.8–89.1 — pts Yes No
75% 84.1–86.4 87.0–88.9 — pts Yes No
Dr. Wallace — DAL at LVA — Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99
Level DAL range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.0–87.5 85.7–89.3 1.77 pts Yes No
90% 82.4–87.0 86.7–89.0 0.31 pts Yes No
85% 82.7–86.7 86.9–88.9 — pts Yes No
80% 83.0–86.5 86.9–88.8 — pts Yes No
75% 83.1–86.3 87.1–88.8 — pts Yes No
Kevin — DAL at LVA — Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99
Level DAL range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.2–87.3 85.5–90.9 1.77 pts — No
90% 82.6–86.9 85.9–90.5 0.93 pts — No
85% 82.9–86.6 86.2–90.2 0.38 pts — No
80% 83.1–86.4 86.4–90.0 — pts — No
75% 83.3–86.2 86.6–89.8 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — DAL at LVA — Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99
Level DAL range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.0–86.8 85.2–90.8 1.62 pts — No
90% 82.4–86.4 85.6–90.3 0.78 pts — No
85% 82.6–86.1 85.9–90.0 0.24 pts — No
80% 82.8–85.9 86.1–89.8 — pts — No
75% 83.0–85.8 86.3–89.6 — pts — No
Ice — DAL at LVA — Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99
Level DAL range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.3–86.5 85.9–90.5 0.59 pts Yes No
90% 82.7–86.2 86.1–90.0 0.05 pts Yes No
85% 82.9–86.0 86.2–89.7 — pts Yes No
80% 83.1–85.8 86.3–89.4 — pts Yes No
75% 83.2–85.7 86.6–89.0 — pts Yes No
Jamal — DAL at LVA — Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99
Level DAL range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.6–87.0 84.9–90.7 2.14 pts — No
90% 82.9–86.7 85.4–90.2 1.31 pts — No
85% 83.1–86.4 85.7–89.9 0.77 pts — No
80% 83.3–86.3 85.9–89.7 0.36 pts — No
75% 83.5–86.1 86.1–89.5 0.02 pts — No
Jordan — DAL at LVA — Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99
Level DAL range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.2–87.2 85.5–90.4 1.7 pts — No
90% 82.6–86.8 85.9–90.0 0.9 pts — No
85% 82.9–86.6 86.2–89.7 0.38 pts — No
80% 83.1–86.3 86.4–89.5 — pts — No
75% 83.2–86.2 86.5–89.4 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — DAL at LVA — Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99
Level DAL range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.0–86.4 85.7–90.2 0.65 pts Yes No
90% 83.2–86.2 86.1–89.9 0.12 pts Yes No
85% 83.3–85.9 86.3–89.6 — pts Yes No
80% 83.5–85.8 86.5–89.4 — pts Yes No
75% 83.6–85.6 86.6–89.3 — pts Yes No
Maya Jefferson — DAL at LVA — Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99
Level DAL range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.2–87.4 85.1–90.4 2.29 pts — No
90% 82.6–87.0 85.5–90.0 1.45 pts — No
85% 82.9–86.7 85.8–89.7 0.9 pts — No
80% 83.1–86.5 86.0–89.5 0.48 pts — No
75% 83.3–86.3 86.2–89.3 0.12 pts — No
Lexi — DAL at LVA — Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99
Level DAL range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.4–86.5 85.5–90.3 0.94 pts Yes No
90% 82.7–86.1 86.0–90.2 0.15 pts Yes No
85% 82.9–85.9 86.1–89.1 — pts Yes No
80% 83.1–85.8 86.3–88.9 — pts Yes No
75% 83.2–85.6 86.5–88.7 — pts Yes No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — DAL at LVA — Actual: DAL 84, LVA 99
Level DAL range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.5–87.2 85.3–90.7 1.94 pts — No
90% 82.9–86.8 85.7–90.2 1.13 pts — No
85% 83.1–86.6 86.0–89.9 0.6 pts — No
80% 83.3–86.4 86.2–89.7 0.19 pts — No
75% 83.5–86.2 86.4–89.5 — pts — No