Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 27, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Atlanta Dream at Seattle Storm

ATL 90 – SEA 105

June 27, 2026 · Final

Dr. Lila Shah

Best model for this game

Dr. Lila Shah
All models: 0-12
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for ATL at SEA

All 12 models’ predicted scores

ATL — one dot per model SEA — one dot per model Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105
Vince Chambers
ATL 84.0–89.1 SEA 77.2–81.0 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.1) — by 7.4 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.4–88.7 SEA 77.5–80.7 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.1) — by 7.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.7–88.4 SEA 77.7–80.5 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.1) — by 7.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.9–88.2 SEA 77.9–80.4 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.1) — by 7.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 85.1–88.0 SEA 78.0–80.2 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.1) — by 7.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
47.56
p-value
3.45e-90

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg Tol Warning
ATL 83.5–89.2 SEA 77.4–81.1 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.3) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.0) — by 7.3 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.0–88.7 SEA 77.4–81.1 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.3) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.0) — by 7.3 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.3–88.4 SEA 77.6–80.9 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.3) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.0) — by 7.3 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.5–88.2 SEA 77.8–80.6 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.3) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.0) — by 7.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.7–88.0 SEA 77.8–80.4 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.3) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.0) — by 7.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
39.46
p-value
4.95e-82

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace Tol Warning
ATL 83.4–88.5 SEA 77.2–82.7 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 6.9 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.1–87.8 SEA 77.5–82.1 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 6.9 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.7–87.6 SEA 77.9–81.5 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 6.9 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.8–87.5 SEA 78.0–81.0 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 6.9 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.9–87.4 SEA 78.1–80.4 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 6.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
33.80
p-value
1.24e-73

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin Tol Warning
ATL 83.0–89.4 SEA 77.3–82.6 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 7.0 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.5–88.9 SEA 77.4–81.7 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 7.0 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.8–88.6 SEA 77.7–81.6 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 7.0 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.1–88.3 SEA 77.9–81.2 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 7.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.3–88.1 SEA 78.0–80.8 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 7.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
31.63
p-value
1.00e-69

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
ATL 82.6–88.1 SEA 76.9–82.5 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.4) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 5.7 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.1–87.7 SEA 77.4–82.0 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.4) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 5.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.3–87.4 SEA 77.7–81.7 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.4) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 5.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.6–87.1 SEA 77.9–81.5 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.4) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 5.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.7–87.0 SEA 78.1–81.3 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.4) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 5.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
29.39
p-value
1.73e-65

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice Tol Warning
ATL 82.5–87.9 SEA 77.4–83.6 Overlap 1.08 pts Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.4) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 5.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 82.7–87.4 SEA 78.0–83.0 Overlap 0.35 pts Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.4) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 5.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 82.9–87.2 SEA 78.2–82.8 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.4) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 5.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.0–86.9 SEA 78.3–82.4 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.4) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 5.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.6–86.8 SEA 78.3–82.0 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.4) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 5.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
23.44
p-value
1.70e-52

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal Tol Warning
ATL 82.4–89.3 SEA 77.4–82.6 Overlap 0.18 pts Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.0–88.7 SEA 77.6–82.3 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.4–88.4 SEA 77.8–81.9 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.6–88.1 SEA 77.9–81.8 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.9–87.9 SEA 77.9–81.5 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.9) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
26.19
p-value
5.99e-59

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan Tol Warning
ATL 82.3–89.0 SEA 77.9–82.3 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.1 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 82.8–88.5 SEA 78.1–82.0 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.1 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.2–88.1 SEA 78.2–81.6 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.1 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.4–87.9 SEA 78.3–81.4 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.7–87.6 SEA 78.3–81.3 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
27.58
p-value
2.47e-61

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin Tol Warning
ATL 82.4–89.0 SEA 77.5–82.6 Overlap 0.25 pts Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 6.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 82.9–88.4 SEA 77.8–82.5 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 6.0 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.2–88.1 SEA 77.9–82.2 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 6.0 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.5–87.8 SEA 78.0–81.9 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 6.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.7–87.6 SEA 78.1–81.8 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.7) — by 6.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
25.89
p-value
2.36e-58

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson Tol Warning
ATL 82.5–88.9 SEA 77.2–82.6 Overlap 0.05 pts Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 6.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.0–88.4 SEA 77.6–81.9 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 6.3 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.3–88.0 SEA 77.9–81.6 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 6.3 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.6–87.8 SEA 77.9–81.3 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 6.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.8–87.6 SEA 77.9–81.0 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 6.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
28.08
p-value
7.26e-63

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi Tol Warning
ATL 82.9–88.8 SEA 77.3–83.0 Overlap 0.08 pts Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.6) — by 6.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 83.0–87.8 SEA 77.8–82.9 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.6) — by 6.2 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.2–87.7 SEA 78.0–82.2 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.6) — by 6.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.9–87.3 SEA 78.1–81.9 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.6) — by 6.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.0–87.2 SEA 78.1–81.4 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 85.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.6) — by 6.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
26.27
p-value
4.25e-59

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
ATL 82.4–90.0 SEA 76.9–82.2 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.7 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.0–89.4 SEA 77.3–81.8 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.4–89.0 SEA 77.6–81.5 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 83.7–88.7 SEA 77.8–81.3 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 84.0–88.4 SEA 78.0–81.1 No overlap Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 86.2) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 6.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
29.15
p-value
1.41e-61

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — ATL at SEA — Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105
Level ATL range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.0–89.1 77.2–81.0 — pts — No
90% 84.4–88.7 77.5–80.7 — pts — No
85% 84.7–88.4 77.7–80.5 — pts — No
80% 84.9–88.2 77.9–80.4 — pts — No
75% 85.1–88.0 78.0–80.2 — pts — No
Reg — ATL at SEA — Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105
Level ATL range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.5–89.2 77.4–81.1 — pts Yes No
90% 84.0–88.7 77.4–81.1 — pts Yes No
85% 84.3–88.4 77.6–80.9 — pts Yes No
80% 84.5–88.2 77.8–80.6 — pts Yes No
75% 84.7–88.0 77.8–80.4 — pts Yes No
Dr. Wallace — ATL at SEA — Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105
Level ATL range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.4–88.5 77.2–82.7 — pts Yes No
90% 84.1–87.8 77.5–82.1 — pts Yes No
85% 84.7–87.6 77.9–81.5 — pts Yes No
80% 84.8–87.5 78.0–81.0 — pts Yes No
75% 84.9–87.4 78.1–80.4 — pts Yes No
Kevin — ATL at SEA — Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105
Level ATL range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.0–89.4 77.3–82.6 — pts Yes No
90% 83.5–88.9 77.4–81.7 — pts Yes No
85% 83.8–88.6 77.7–81.6 — pts Yes No
80% 84.1–88.3 77.9–81.2 — pts Yes No
75% 84.3–88.1 78.0–80.8 — pts Yes No
Dr. Lila Shah — ATL at SEA — Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105
Level ATL range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.6–88.1 76.9–82.5 — pts — No
90% 83.1–87.7 77.4–82.0 — pts — No
85% 83.3–87.4 77.7–81.7 — pts — No
80% 83.6–87.1 77.9–81.5 — pts — No
75% 83.7–87.0 78.1–81.3 — pts — No
Ice — ATL at SEA — Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105
Level ATL range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.5–87.9 77.4–83.6 1.08 pts Yes No
90% 82.7–87.4 78.0–83.0 0.35 pts Yes No
85% 82.9–87.2 78.2–82.8 — pts Yes No
80% 83.0–86.9 78.3–82.4 — pts Yes No
75% 83.6–86.8 78.3–82.0 — pts Yes No
Jamal — ATL at SEA — Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105
Level ATL range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.4–89.3 77.4–82.6 0.18 pts Yes No
90% 83.0–88.7 77.6–82.3 — pts Yes No
85% 83.4–88.4 77.8–81.9 — pts Yes No
80% 83.6–88.1 77.9–81.8 — pts Yes No
75% 83.9–87.9 77.9–81.5 — pts Yes No
Jordan — ATL at SEA — Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105
Level ATL range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.3–89.0 77.9–82.3 — pts Yes No
90% 82.8–88.5 78.1–82.0 — pts Yes No
85% 83.2–88.1 78.2–81.6 — pts Yes No
80% 83.4–87.9 78.3–81.4 — pts Yes No
75% 83.7–87.6 78.3–81.3 — pts Yes No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — ATL at SEA — Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105
Level ATL range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.4–89.0 77.5–82.6 0.25 pts Yes No
90% 82.9–88.4 77.8–82.5 — pts Yes No
85% 83.2–88.1 77.9–82.2 — pts Yes No
80% 83.5–87.8 78.0–81.9 — pts Yes No
75% 83.7–87.6 78.1–81.8 — pts Yes No
Maya Jefferson — ATL at SEA — Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105
Level ATL range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.5–88.9 77.2–82.6 0.05 pts Yes No
90% 83.0–88.4 77.6–81.9 — pts Yes No
85% 83.3–88.0 77.9–81.6 — pts Yes No
80% 83.6–87.8 77.9–81.3 — pts Yes No
75% 83.8–87.6 77.9–81.0 — pts Yes No
Lexi — ATL at SEA — Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105
Level ATL range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.9–88.8 77.3–83.0 0.08 pts Yes No
90% 83.0–87.8 77.8–82.9 — pts Yes No
85% 83.2–87.7 78.0–82.2 — pts Yes No
80% 83.9–87.3 78.1–81.9 — pts Yes No
75% 84.0–87.2 78.1–81.4 — pts Yes No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — ATL at SEA — Actual: ATL 90, SEA 105
Level ATL range SEA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.4–90.0 76.9–82.2 — pts — No
90% 83.0–89.4 77.3–81.8 — pts — No
85% 83.4–89.0 77.6–81.5 — pts — No
80% 83.7–88.7 77.8–81.3 — pts — No
75% 84.0–88.4 78.0–81.1 — pts — No