Clay's Almanac
WNBA · June 28, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Portland Fire at Washington Mystics

POR 123 – WAS 124

June 28, 2026 · Final

Maya Jefferson

Best model for this game

Maya Jefferson
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for POR at WAS

All 12 models’ predicted scores

POR — one dot per model WAS — one dot per model Actual: POR 123, WAS 124
Vince Chambers
POR 78.1–83.6 WAS 81.4–86.7 Overlap 2.2 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 84.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 78.6–83.2 WAS 81.8–86.3 Overlap 1.34 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 84.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) — by 3.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 78.9–82.9 WAS 82.1–86.0 Overlap 0.78 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 84.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

POR 79.1–82.7 WAS 82.3–85.8 Overlap 0.34 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 84.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) — by 3.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

POR 79.3–82.5 WAS 82.5–85.6 No overlap Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 84.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.9) — by 3.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
-16.87
p-value
5.47e-37

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg Tol Warning
POR 79.0–83.4 WAS 81.4–86.8 Overlap 2.02 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 84.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.4–83.2 WAS 81.8–86.4 Overlap 1.34 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 84.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.6–83.0 WAS 82.1–86.1 Overlap 0.86 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 84.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

POR 79.7–82.6 WAS 82.3–85.9 Overlap 0.23 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 84.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

POR 79.9–82.2 WAS 82.5–85.7 No overlap Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 84.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
-16.00
p-value
1.03e-34

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
POR 78.6–83.6 WAS 80.4–87.2 Overlap 3.25 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

POR 79.0–83.2 WAS 80.9–86.6 Overlap 2.3 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.3–82.9 WAS 81.3–86.3 Overlap 1.68 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.5–82.7 WAS 81.5–86.0 Overlap 1.21 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.6–82.6 WAS 81.8–85.8 Overlap 0.81 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
-12.72
p-value
2.96e-25

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin Tol Warning
POR 79.0–83.4 WAS 80.3–86.6 Overlap 3.06 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

POR 79.2–83.2 WAS 80.7–85.7 Overlap 2.46 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.4–82.8 WAS 81.0–85.5 Overlap 1.78 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.6–82.6 WAS 81.3–85.4 Overlap 1.31 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.6–82.5 WAS 81.5–85.4 Overlap 1.03 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.7) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
-12.02
p-value
1.32e-23

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
POR 78.6–84.0 WAS 79.4–87.5 Overlap 4.6 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

POR 79.0–83.5 WAS 80.0–86.8 Overlap 3.51 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

POR 79.3–83.2 WAS 80.4–86.4 Overlap 2.8 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.5–83.0 WAS 80.8–86.1 Overlap 2.25 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.7–82.8 WAS 81.0–85.8 Overlap 1.8 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
-8.99
p-value
1.87e-15

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice Tol Warning
POR 78.3–83.7 WAS 80.5–85.2 Overlap 3.18 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

POR 78.7–83.2 WAS 80.7–85.1 Overlap 2.49 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.0–82.9 WAS 80.9–84.9 Overlap 2.08 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.2–82.7 WAS 80.9–84.7 Overlap 1.78 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.4–82.5 WAS 81.1–84.7 Overlap 1.42 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
-11.17
p-value
1.75e-21

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal Tol Warning
POR 78.1–84.0 WAS 79.3–85.9 Overlap 4.62 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

POR 78.6–83.5 WAS 80.0–85.5 Overlap 3.45 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

POR 78.9–83.2 WAS 80.1–85.3 Overlap 3.06 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

POR 79.1–82.9 WAS 80.5–85.1 Overlap 2.47 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.3–82.8 WAS 80.7–85.0 Overlap 2.03 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
-8.76
p-value
5.60e-15

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan Tol Warning
POR 78.2–83.5 WAS 79.5–86.0 Overlap 3.99 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

POR 78.6–83.1 WAS 80.2–85.6 Overlap 2.84 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 78.9–82.8 WAS 80.5–85.4 Overlap 2.28 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.1–82.6 WAS 80.8–85.2 Overlap 1.75 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.3–82.4 WAS 81.0–85.1 Overlap 1.46 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 80.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
-11.22
p-value
3.42e-21

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin Tol Warning
POR 78.3–83.7 WAS 79.8–85.3 Overlap 3.89 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

POR 78.7–83.2 WAS 80.4–85.2 Overlap 2.85 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.0–83.0 WAS 80.8–85.1 Overlap 2.19 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.2–82.7 WAS 81.0–84.9 Overlap 1.74 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.4–82.6 WAS 81.5–84.9 Overlap 1.05 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
-10.55
p-value
9.19e-20

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
POR 78.6–83.8 WAS 79.6–86.7 Overlap 4.25 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

POR 79.0–83.4 WAS 80.2–86.1 Overlap 3.25 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

POR 79.3–83.1 WAS 80.5–85.8 Overlap 2.59 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.5–82.9 WAS 80.8–85.5 Overlap 2.09 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.6–82.7 WAS 81.1–85.2 Overlap 1.67 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.2) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
-9.00
p-value
1.22e-15

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi Tol Warning
POR 79.4–82.8 WAS 79.7–86.9 Overlap 3.12 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

POR 79.5–82.7 WAS 80.3–86.3 Overlap 2.47 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.7–82.6 WAS 80.6–86.0 Overlap 2.0 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.8–82.6 WAS 80.9–85.7 Overlap 1.67 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.9–82.5 WAS 81.2–85.4 Overlap 1.3 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.1) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
-9.80
p-value
1.15e-17

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
POR 78.2–83.7 WAS 80.9–86.1 Overlap 2.81 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 78.6–83.3 WAS 81.3–85.7 Overlap 1.95 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 78.9–83.0 WAS 81.6–85.4 Overlap 1.39 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

POR 79.2–82.8 WAS 81.8–85.2 Overlap 0.95 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

POR 79.3–82.6 WAS 82.0–85.0 Overlap 0.59 pts Actual: POR 123, WAS 124

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Washington Mystics (avg. 83.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.0) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
-13.61
p-value
2.78e-28

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — POR at WAS — Actual: POR 123, WAS 124
Level POR range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.1–83.6 81.4–86.7 2.2 pts — No
90% 78.6–83.2 81.8–86.3 1.34 pts — No
85% 78.9–82.9 82.1–86.0 0.78 pts — No
80% 79.1–82.7 82.3–85.8 0.34 pts — No
75% 79.3–82.5 82.5–85.6 — pts — No
Reg — POR at WAS — Actual: POR 123, WAS 124
Level POR range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.0–83.4 81.4–86.8 2.02 pts Yes No
90% 79.4–83.2 81.8–86.4 1.34 pts Yes No
85% 79.6–83.0 82.1–86.1 0.86 pts Yes No
80% 79.7–82.6 82.3–85.9 0.23 pts Yes No
75% 79.9–82.2 82.5–85.7 — pts Yes No
Dr. Wallace — POR at WAS — Actual: POR 123, WAS 124
Level POR range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.6–83.6 80.4–87.2 3.25 pts — No
90% 79.0–83.2 80.9–86.6 2.3 pts — No
85% 79.3–82.9 81.3–86.3 1.68 pts — No
80% 79.5–82.7 81.5–86.0 1.21 pts — No
75% 79.6–82.6 81.8–85.8 0.81 pts — No
Kevin — POR at WAS — Actual: POR 123, WAS 124
Level POR range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.0–83.4 80.3–86.6 3.06 pts Yes No
90% 79.2–83.2 80.7–85.7 2.46 pts Yes No
85% 79.4–82.8 81.0–85.5 1.78 pts Yes No
80% 79.6–82.6 81.3–85.4 1.31 pts Yes No
75% 79.6–82.5 81.5–85.4 1.03 pts Yes No
Dr. Lila Shah — POR at WAS — Actual: POR 123, WAS 124
Level POR range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.6–84.0 79.4–87.5 4.6 pts — No
90% 79.0–83.5 80.0–86.8 3.51 pts — No
85% 79.3–83.2 80.4–86.4 2.8 pts — No
80% 79.5–83.0 80.8–86.1 2.25 pts — No
75% 79.7–82.8 81.0–85.8 1.8 pts — No
Ice — POR at WAS — Actual: POR 123, WAS 124
Level POR range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.3–83.7 80.5–85.2 3.18 pts Yes No
90% 78.7–83.2 80.7–85.1 2.49 pts Yes No
85% 79.0–82.9 80.9–84.9 2.08 pts Yes No
80% 79.2–82.7 80.9–84.7 1.78 pts Yes No
75% 79.4–82.5 81.1–84.7 1.42 pts Yes No
Jamal — POR at WAS — Actual: POR 123, WAS 124
Level POR range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.1–84.0 79.3–85.9 4.62 pts Yes No
90% 78.6–83.5 80.0–85.5 3.45 pts Yes No
85% 78.9–83.2 80.1–85.3 3.06 pts Yes No
80% 79.1–82.9 80.5–85.1 2.47 pts Yes No
75% 79.3–82.8 80.7–85.0 2.03 pts Yes No
Jordan — POR at WAS — Actual: POR 123, WAS 124
Level POR range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.2–83.5 79.5–86.0 3.99 pts Yes No
90% 78.6–83.1 80.2–85.6 2.84 pts Yes No
85% 78.9–82.8 80.5–85.4 2.28 pts Yes No
80% 79.1–82.6 80.8–85.2 1.75 pts Yes No
75% 79.3–82.4 81.0–85.1 1.46 pts Yes No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — POR at WAS — Actual: POR 123, WAS 124
Level POR range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.3–83.7 79.8–85.3 3.89 pts Yes No
90% 78.7–83.2 80.4–85.2 2.85 pts Yes No
85% 79.0–83.0 80.8–85.1 2.19 pts Yes No
80% 79.2–82.7 81.0–84.9 1.74 pts Yes No
75% 79.4–82.6 81.5–84.9 1.05 pts Yes No
Maya Jefferson — POR at WAS — Actual: POR 123, WAS 124
Level POR range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.6–83.8 79.6–86.7 4.25 pts — No
90% 79.0–83.4 80.2–86.1 3.25 pts — No
85% 79.3–83.1 80.5–85.8 2.59 pts — No
80% 79.5–82.9 80.8–85.5 2.09 pts — No
75% 79.6–82.7 81.1–85.2 1.67 pts — No
Lexi — POR at WAS — Actual: POR 123, WAS 124
Level POR range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.4–82.8 79.7–86.9 3.12 pts Yes No
90% 79.5–82.7 80.3–86.3 2.47 pts Yes No
85% 79.7–82.6 80.6–86.0 2.0 pts Yes No
80% 79.8–82.6 80.9–85.7 1.67 pts Yes No
75% 79.9–82.5 81.2–85.4 1.3 pts Yes No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — POR at WAS — Actual: POR 123, WAS 124
Level POR range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.2–83.7 80.9–86.1 2.81 pts — No
90% 78.6–83.3 81.3–85.7 1.95 pts — No
85% 78.9–83.0 81.6–85.4 1.39 pts — No
80% 79.2–82.8 81.8–85.2 0.95 pts — No
75% 79.3–82.6 82.0–85.0 0.59 pts — No