Clay's Almanac
WNBA · July 2, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Seattle Storm at Phoenix Mercury

SEA 67 – PHX 90

July 2, 2026 · Final

Ice

Best model for this game

Ice
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for SEA at PHX

All 12 models’ predicted scores

SEA — one dot per model PHX — one dot per model Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90
Vince Chambers
SEA 77.4–81.3 PHX 81.3–84.8 Overlap 0.03 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 77.8–81.0 PHX 81.3–84.3 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 3.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.0–80.8 PHX 81.4–84.0 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 3.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.1–80.6 PHX 81.6–83.8 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 3.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.2–80.5 PHX 81.7–83.8 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.8) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.4) — by 3.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
-26.99
p-value
5.43e-69

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
SEA 77.8–81.7 PHX 80.2–85.0 Overlap 1.5 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 77.9–81.3 PHX 80.6–84.6 Overlap 0.67 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 78.3–81.1 PHX 80.8–84.3 Overlap 0.26 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 78.5–80.8 PHX 81.0–84.1 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 3.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.5–80.7 PHX 81.2–84.0 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.5) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
-20.94
p-value
1.03e-52

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
SEA 77.4–81.2 PHX 80.8–84.4 Overlap 0.4 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 77.7–80.9 PHX 81.1–84.1 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.3 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 77.9–80.7 PHX 81.2–83.9 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.3 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.1–80.5 PHX 81.4–83.7 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.2–80.4 PHX 81.5–83.6 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
-28.53
p-value
4.49e-73

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
SEA 77.5–80.8 PHX 81.0–84.2 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 77.8–80.6 PHX 81.2–84.0 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 77.9–80.4 PHX 81.4–83.8 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.1–80.3 PHX 81.5–83.7 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.2–80.1 PHX 81.6–83.6 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
-33.23
p-value
3.04e-84

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
SEA 77.2–81.3 PHX 80.7–84.6 Overlap 0.52 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 77.5–80.9 PHX 81.1–84.3 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 77.7–80.7 PHX 81.3–84.1 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 77.9–80.6 PHX 81.4–83.9 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.0–80.4 PHX 81.5–83.8 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
-27.79
p-value
4.21e-71

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
SEA 77.3–80.8 PHX 80.8–84.3 Overlap 0.0 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.0) — by 3.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 77.6–80.5 PHX 81.0–84.0 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.0) — by 3.5 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 77.8–80.3 PHX 81.2–83.8 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.0) — by 3.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 77.9–80.2 PHX 81.4–83.7 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.0) — by 3.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.0–80.0 PHX 81.5–83.6 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.0) — by 3.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
-31.97
p-value
2.40e-81

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
SEA 77.9–80.7 PHX 80.8–84.3 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.1–80.5 PHX 81.1–84.0 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.2–80.3 PHX 81.3–83.9 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.3–80.1 PHX 81.4–83.7 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.4–80.0 PHX 81.5–83.6 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
-30.76
p-value
1.55e-78

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
SEA 77.6–80.8 PHX 80.8–84.4 Overlap 0.05 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 77.9–80.6 PHX 81.1–84.1 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.0–80.4 PHX 81.3–83.9 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.2–80.3 PHX 81.4–83.8 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.3–80.2 PHX 81.5–83.7 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
-31.52
p-value
6.54e-80

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
SEA 77.4–81.1 PHX 80.9–84.2 Overlap 0.13 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 77.7–80.8 PHX 81.2–84.0 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 77.8–80.6 PHX 81.4–83.8 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.0–80.4 PHX 81.5–83.7 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.1–80.3 PHX 81.6–83.6 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.2) — by 3.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
-30.73
p-value
7.18e-78

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
SEA 77.5–81.0 PHX 80.9–84.2 Overlap 0.12 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 77.8–80.7 PHX 81.2–83.9 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.3 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.0–80.6 PHX 81.3–83.8 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.3 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.1–80.4 PHX 81.5–83.6 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.2–80.3 PHX 81.6–83.5 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.6) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
-30.86
p-value
1.41e-78

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
SEA 77.4–81.1 PHX 80.4–84.9 Overlap 0.69 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 77.7–80.8 PHX 80.8–84.5 Overlap 0.03 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 77.9–80.6 PHX 81.0–84.3 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.0–80.5 PHX 81.2–84.1 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.2–80.4 PHX 81.4–84.0 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.7) over Seattle Storm (avg. 79.3) — by 3.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
-26.48
p-value
6.57e-67

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
SEA 78.2–81.9 PHX 80.7–84.4 Overlap 1.23 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.0) — by 2.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

SEA 78.5–81.6 PHX 81.0–84.1 Overlap 0.63 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.0) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 78.7–81.4 PHX 81.2–83.9 Overlap 0.24 pts Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.0) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

SEA 78.8–81.3 PHX 81.3–83.7 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.0) — by 2.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

SEA 78.9–81.2 PHX 81.5–83.6 No overlap Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 82.5) over Seattle Storm (avg. 80.0) — by 2.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
-21.43
p-value
4.05e-54

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — SEA at PHX — Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90
Level SEA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.4–81.3 81.3–84.8 0.03 pts — No
90% 77.8–81.0 81.3–84.3 — pts — No
85% 78.0–80.8 81.4–84.0 — pts — No
80% 78.1–80.6 81.6–83.8 — pts — No
75% 78.2–80.5 81.7–83.8 — pts — No
Reg — SEA at PHX — Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90
Level SEA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.8–81.7 80.2–85.0 1.5 pts — No
90% 77.9–81.3 80.6–84.6 0.67 pts — No
85% 78.3–81.1 80.8–84.3 0.26 pts — No
80% 78.5–80.8 81.0–84.1 — pts — No
75% 78.5–80.7 81.2–84.0 — pts — No
Dr. Wallace — SEA at PHX — Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90
Level SEA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.4–81.2 80.8–84.4 0.4 pts — No
90% 77.7–80.9 81.1–84.1 — pts — No
85% 77.9–80.7 81.2–83.9 — pts — No
80% 78.1–80.5 81.4–83.7 — pts — No
75% 78.2–80.4 81.5–83.6 — pts — No
Kevin — SEA at PHX — Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90
Level SEA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.5–80.8 81.0–84.2 — pts — No
90% 77.8–80.6 81.2–84.0 — pts — No
85% 77.9–80.4 81.4–83.8 — pts — No
80% 78.1–80.3 81.5–83.7 — pts — No
75% 78.2–80.1 81.6–83.6 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — SEA at PHX — Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90
Level SEA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.2–81.3 80.7–84.6 0.52 pts — No
90% 77.5–80.9 81.1–84.3 — pts — No
85% 77.7–80.7 81.3–84.1 — pts — No
80% 77.9–80.6 81.4–83.9 — pts — No
75% 78.0–80.4 81.5–83.8 — pts — No
Ice — SEA at PHX — Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90
Level SEA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.3–80.8 80.8–84.3 0.0 pts — No
90% 77.6–80.5 81.0–84.0 — pts — No
85% 77.8–80.3 81.2–83.8 — pts — No
80% 77.9–80.2 81.4–83.7 — pts — No
75% 78.0–80.0 81.5–83.6 — pts — No
Jamal — SEA at PHX — Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90
Level SEA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.9–80.7 80.8–84.3 — pts — No
90% 78.1–80.5 81.1–84.0 — pts — No
85% 78.2–80.3 81.3–83.9 — pts — No
80% 78.3–80.1 81.4–83.7 — pts — No
75% 78.4–80.0 81.5–83.6 — pts — No
Jordan — SEA at PHX — Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90
Level SEA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.6–80.8 80.8–84.4 0.05 pts — No
90% 77.9–80.6 81.1–84.1 — pts — No
85% 78.0–80.4 81.3–83.9 — pts — No
80% 78.2–80.3 81.4–83.8 — pts — No
75% 78.3–80.2 81.5–83.7 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — SEA at PHX — Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90
Level SEA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.4–81.1 80.9–84.2 0.13 pts — No
90% 77.7–80.8 81.2–84.0 — pts — No
85% 77.8–80.6 81.4–83.8 — pts — No
80% 78.0–80.4 81.5–83.7 — pts — No
75% 78.1–80.3 81.6–83.6 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — SEA at PHX — Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90
Level SEA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.5–81.0 80.9–84.2 0.12 pts — No
90% 77.8–80.7 81.2–83.9 — pts — No
85% 78.0–80.6 81.3–83.8 — pts — No
80% 78.1–80.4 81.5–83.6 — pts — No
75% 78.2–80.3 81.6–83.5 — pts — No
Lexi — SEA at PHX — Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90
Level SEA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 77.4–81.1 80.4–84.9 0.69 pts — No
90% 77.7–80.8 80.8–84.5 0.03 pts — No
85% 77.9–80.6 81.0–84.3 — pts — No
80% 78.0–80.5 81.2–84.1 — pts — No
75% 78.2–80.4 81.4–84.0 — pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — SEA at PHX — Actual: SEA 67, PHX 90
Level SEA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 78.2–81.9 80.7–84.4 1.23 pts — No
90% 78.5–81.6 81.0–84.1 0.63 pts — No
85% 78.7–81.4 81.2–83.9 0.24 pts — No
80% 78.8–81.3 81.3–83.7 — pts — No
75% 78.9–81.2 81.5–83.6 — pts — No