Clay's Almanac
WNBA · July 9, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Las Vegas Aces at Portland Fire

LVA 88 – POR 80

July 9, 2026 · Final

Kevin

Best model for this game

Kevin
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for LVA at POR

All 12 models’ predicted scores

LVA — one dot per model POR — one dot per model Actual: LVA 88, POR 80
Vince Chambers
LVA 85.1–89.6 POR 79.8–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 5.7 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.5–89.2 POR 80.1–83.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 5.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.7–89.0 POR 80.3–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 5.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.9–88.8 POR 80.4–82.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 5.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–88.7 POR 80.5–82.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 5.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
43.76
p-value
4.58e-101

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
LVA 86.0–89.6 POR 79.8–83.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.1 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.3–89.5 POR 80.1–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.1 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.4–89.4 POR 80.3–83.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.1 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.6–89.0 POR 80.4–82.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.7–88.9 POR 80.6–82.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.7) — by 6.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
45.17
p-value
1.40e-103

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
LVA 86.1–89.7 POR 79.7–83.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.1 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.3–89.5 POR 80.0–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.1 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.4–89.3 POR 80.2–82.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.1 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.5–89.1 POR 80.4–82.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.6–89.0 POR 80.5–82.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
48.38
p-value
2.34e-107

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
LVA 85.4–90.3 POR 79.9–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.2 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.8–89.9 POR 80.2–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.2 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–89.7 POR 80.4–82.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–89.5 POR 80.5–82.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.4–89.3 POR 80.6–82.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
46.13
p-value
3.78e-99

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
LVA 85.3–89.3 POR 79.3–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 6.0 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.6–89.0 POR 79.6–82.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 6.0 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.8–88.8 POR 79.8–82.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 6.0 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–88.6 POR 79.9–82.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 6.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.1–88.5 POR 80.1–82.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.3) — by 6.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
47.02
p-value
1.13e-108

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
LVA 85.6–90.1 POR 79.9–83.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 5.9 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.9–89.5 POR 80.2–82.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 5.9 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.1–89.3 POR 80.3–82.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 5.9 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–89.0 POR 80.5–82.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 5.9 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–88.6 POR 80.6–82.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 5.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
44.66
p-value
3.79e-94

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
LVA 85.8–89.9 POR 79.5–83.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.0 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–89.5 POR 79.8–83.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.0 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.1–88.9 POR 80.0–82.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.0 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.1–88.7 POR 80.2–82.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–88.5 POR 80.3–82.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
43.39
p-value
1.28e-100

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
LVA 86.0–89.3 POR 79.7–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.0 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–89.0 POR 80.0–83.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.0 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.5–88.8 POR 80.2–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.0 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.6–88.8 POR 80.3–82.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.7–88.7 POR 80.4–82.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
48.94
p-value
7.95e-112

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
LVA 86.4–89.8 POR 79.7–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.2 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.5–89.1 POR 80.0–83.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.2 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.6–88.9 POR 80.2–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.8–88.8 POR 80.3–82.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.8–88.7 POR 80.5–82.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
50.24
p-value
6.91e-114

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
LVA 85.3–90.0 POR 79.7–83.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.1 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.7–89.6 POR 80.0–83.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.1 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.9–89.3 POR 80.2–82.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.1 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.1–89.2 POR 80.4–82.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.3–89.0 POR 80.5–82.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.6) — by 6.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
46.03
p-value
1.41e-103

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
LVA 85.2–90.0 POR 79.6–83.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.1 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.6–89.6 POR 79.9–83.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.1 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.8–89.4 POR 80.1–82.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.1 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–89.2 POR 80.2–82.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–89.0 POR 80.4–82.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.5) — by 6.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
44.00
p-value
2.30e-100

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
LVA 85.0–90.4 POR 79.9–84.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.9) — by 5.3 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.3–89.6 POR 80.2–83.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.9) — by 5.3 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.7–89.1 POR 80.4–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.9) — by 5.3 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.8–88.7 POR 80.6–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.9) — by 5.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.9–88.7 POR 80.7–83.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 88, POR 80

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 81.9) — by 5.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
32.38
p-value
1.53e-75

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 88, POR 80
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.1–89.6 79.8–83.5 — pts — Yes
90% 85.5–89.2 80.1–83.2 — pts — No
85% 85.7–89.0 80.3–83.0 — pts — No
80% 85.9–88.8 80.4–82.8 — pts — No
75% 86.0–88.7 80.5–82.7 — pts — No
Reg — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 88, POR 80
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.0–89.6 79.8–83.6 — pts — Yes
90% 86.3–89.5 80.1–83.3 — pts — No
85% 86.4–89.4 80.3–83.1 — pts — No
80% 86.6–89.0 80.4–82.9 — pts — No
75% 86.7–88.9 80.6–82.8 — pts — No
Dr. Wallace — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 88, POR 80
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.1–89.7 79.7–83.2 — pts — Yes
90% 86.3–89.5 80.0–83.0 — pts — Yes
85% 86.4–89.3 80.2–82.8 — pts — No
80% 86.5–89.1 80.4–82.6 — pts — No
75% 86.6–89.0 80.5–82.5 — pts — No
Kevin — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 88, POR 80
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.4–90.3 79.9–83.3 — pts — Yes
90% 85.8–89.9 80.2–83.0 — pts — No
85% 86.0–89.7 80.4–82.9 — pts — No
80% 86.2–89.5 80.5–82.7 — pts — No
75% 86.4–89.3 80.6–82.6 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 88, POR 80
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.3–89.3 79.3–83.3 — pts — Yes
90% 85.6–89.0 79.6–82.9 — pts — Yes
85% 85.8–88.8 79.8–82.7 — pts — Yes
80% 86.0–88.6 79.9–82.6 — pts — Yes
75% 86.1–88.5 80.1–82.4 — pts — No
Ice — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 88, POR 80
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.6–90.1 79.9–83.1 — pts — Yes
90% 85.9–89.5 80.2–82.8 — pts — No
85% 86.1–89.3 80.3–82.7 — pts — No
80% 86.2–89.0 80.5–82.5 — pts — No
75% 86.2–88.6 80.6–82.4 — pts — No
Jamal — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 88, POR 80
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.8–89.9 79.5–83.4 — pts — Yes
90% 86.0–89.5 79.8–83.1 — pts — Yes
85% 86.1–88.9 80.0–82.9 — pts — Yes
80% 86.1–88.7 80.2–82.8 — pts — No
75% 86.2–88.5 80.3–82.6 — pts — No
Jordan — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 88, POR 80
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.0–89.3 79.7–83.5 — pts — Yes
90% 86.2–89.0 80.0–83.2 — pts — Yes
85% 86.5–88.8 80.2–83.0 — pts — No
80% 86.6–88.8 80.3–82.8 — pts — No
75% 86.7–88.7 80.4–82.7 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 88, POR 80
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.4–89.8 79.7–83.5 — pts — Yes
90% 86.5–89.1 80.0–83.2 — pts — Yes
85% 86.6–88.9 80.2–83.0 — pts — No
80% 86.8–88.8 80.3–82.9 — pts — No
75% 86.8–88.7 80.5–82.7 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 88, POR 80
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.3–90.0 79.7–83.4 — pts — Yes
90% 85.7–89.6 80.0–83.1 — pts — Yes
85% 85.9–89.3 80.2–82.9 — pts — No
80% 86.1–89.2 80.4–82.7 — pts — No
75% 86.3–89.0 80.5–82.6 — pts — No
Lexi — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 88, POR 80
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.2–90.0 79.6–83.4 — pts — Yes
90% 85.6–89.6 79.9–83.1 — pts — Yes
85% 85.8–89.4 80.1–82.9 — pts — No
80% 86.0–89.2 80.2–82.7 — pts — No
75% 86.2–89.0 80.4–82.6 — pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — LVA at POR — Actual: LVA 88, POR 80
Level LVA range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.0–90.4 79.9–84.0 — pts — Yes
90% 85.3–89.6 80.2–83.7 — pts — No
85% 85.7–89.1 80.4–83.5 — pts — No
80% 85.8–88.7 80.6–83.3 — pts — No
75% 85.9–88.7 80.7–83.2 — pts — No