Clay's Almanac
WNBA · July 12, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Indiana Fever at Las Vegas Aces

IND 109 – LVA 75

July 12, 2026 · Final

Coach Sarah Watanabe

Best model for this game

Coach Sarah Watanabe
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for IND at LVA

All 12 models’ predicted scores

IND — one dot per model LVA — one dot per model Actual: IND 109, LVA 75
Vince Chambers
IND 86.9–91.1 LVA 85.4–90.2 Overlap 3.3 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 87.2–90.8 LVA 85.8–89.8 Overlap 2.58 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.5–90.5 LVA 86.1–89.6 Overlap 2.11 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.6–90.4 LVA 86.3–89.4 Overlap 1.75 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.8–90.2 LVA 86.4–89.2 Overlap 1.45 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
8.20
p-value
3.53e-14

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
IND 86.1–91.9 LVA 85.5–90.5 Overlap 4.39 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 86.6–91.5 LVA 85.9–90.1 Overlap 3.53 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 86.9–91.2 LVA 86.2–89.9 Overlap 2.96 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.1–90.9 LVA 86.4–89.7 Overlap 2.53 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.3–90.7 LVA 86.6–89.5 Overlap 2.16 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
5.81
p-value
2.55e-08

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
IND 86.8–91.2 LVA 85.3–90.5 Overlap 3.66 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 87.2–90.9 LVA 85.7–90.0 Overlap 2.89 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.4–90.7 LVA 85.9–89.8 Overlap 2.38 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.6–90.5 LVA 86.2–89.6 Overlap 1.99 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.7–90.3 LVA 86.3–89.4 Overlap 1.67 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
7.53
p-value
2.03e-12

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
IND 86.8–91.3 LVA 85.9–90.3 Overlap 3.47 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 87.2–90.9 LVA 86.2–90.0 Overlap 2.75 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.4–90.7 LVA 86.5–89.7 Overlap 2.29 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.6–90.5 LVA 86.6–89.5 Overlap 1.93 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.8–90.4 LVA 86.8–89.4 Overlap 1.64 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
6.80
p-value
1.28e-10

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
IND 86.0–90.5 LVA 85.6–90.1 Overlap 4.07 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.3) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 86.4–90.1 LVA 86.0–89.7 Overlap 3.35 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.3) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 86.6–89.9 LVA 86.2–89.5 Overlap 2.88 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.3) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 86.8–89.7 LVA 86.4–89.3 Overlap 2.52 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.3) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 86.9–89.6 LVA 86.5–89.2 Overlap 2.22 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.3) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
2.91
p-value
4.05e-03

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
IND 86.9–91.1 LVA 85.6–89.9 Overlap 3.05 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 87.2–90.7 LVA 86.0–89.6 Overlap 2.37 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.4–90.5 LVA 86.2–89.4 Overlap 1.92 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.6–90.3 LVA 86.4–89.2 Overlap 1.58 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.7–90.2 LVA 86.5–89.0 Overlap 1.3 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
8.80
p-value
7.69e-16

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
IND 86.7–91.5 LVA 85.7–90.2 Overlap 3.48 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 87.1–91.1 LVA 86.0–89.8 Overlap 2.73 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.3–90.9 LVA 86.3–89.6 Overlap 2.24 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.5–90.7 LVA 86.5–89.4 Overlap 1.86 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.7–90.5 LVA 86.6–89.2 Overlap 1.55 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
7.99
p-value
1.17e-13

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
IND 87.0–91.0 LVA 86.1–89.8 Overlap 2.85 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.3–90.7 LVA 86.4–89.5 Overlap 2.21 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.5–90.5 LVA 86.5–89.2 Overlap 1.67 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.7–90.3 LVA 86.6–89.1 Overlap 1.47 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.8–90.2 LVA 86.7–89.1 Overlap 1.28 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
7.79
p-value
4.96e-13

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
IND 86.0–90.7 LVA 85.5–90.0 Overlap 4.0 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.8) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 86.6–90.5 LVA 85.9–89.6 Overlap 3.05 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.8) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 87.2–90.1 LVA 86.1–89.4 Overlap 2.2 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.8) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.5–89.9 LVA 86.3–89.2 Overlap 1.66 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.8) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.6–89.8 LVA 86.5–89.0 Overlap 1.42 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.8) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.8) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
6.74
p-value
1.79e-10

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
IND 86.4–91.6 LVA 86.1–90.3 Overlap 3.87 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 86.8–91.2 LVA 86.5–89.5 Overlap 2.69 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.1–90.9 LVA 86.6–89.4 Overlap 2.29 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.3–90.7 LVA 86.7–89.3 Overlap 1.94 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.5–90.5 LVA 86.7–89.0 Overlap 1.53 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
6.96
p-value
5.19e-11

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
IND 86.4–91.1 LVA 85.5–89.7 Overlap 3.27 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 86.8–90.7 LVA 85.9–89.3 Overlap 2.56 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.0–90.4 LVA 86.1–89.1 Overlap 2.1 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.2–90.3 LVA 86.3–89.0 Overlap 1.75 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.4–90.1 LVA 86.4–88.8 Overlap 1.45 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 88.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
7.99
p-value
1.23e-13

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
IND 86.6–92.4 LVA 85.3–89.9 Overlap 3.37 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 87.0–91.9 LVA 85.7–89.6 Overlap 2.53 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.3–91.6 LVA 85.9–89.3 Overlap 1.97 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.6–91.4 LVA 86.1–89.1 Overlap 1.55 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 87.8–91.2 LVA 86.2–89.0 Overlap 1.2 pts Actual: IND 109, LVA 75

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 89.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.6) — by 1.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
11.15
p-value
2.08e-22

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 109, LVA 75
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.9–91.1 85.4–90.2 3.3 pts — No
90% 87.2–90.8 85.8–89.8 2.58 pts — No
85% 87.5–90.5 86.1–89.6 2.11 pts — No
80% 87.6–90.4 86.3–89.4 1.75 pts — No
75% 87.8–90.2 86.4–89.2 1.45 pts — No
Reg — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 109, LVA 75
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.1–91.9 85.5–90.5 4.39 pts — No
90% 86.6–91.5 85.9–90.1 3.53 pts — No
85% 86.9–91.2 86.2–89.9 2.96 pts — No
80% 87.1–90.9 86.4–89.7 2.53 pts — No
75% 87.3–90.7 86.6–89.5 2.16 pts — No
Dr. Wallace — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 109, LVA 75
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.8–91.2 85.3–90.5 3.66 pts — No
90% 87.2–90.9 85.7–90.0 2.89 pts — No
85% 87.4–90.7 85.9–89.8 2.38 pts — No
80% 87.6–90.5 86.2–89.6 1.99 pts — No
75% 87.7–90.3 86.3–89.4 1.67 pts — No
Kevin — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 109, LVA 75
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.8–91.3 85.9–90.3 3.47 pts — No
90% 87.2–90.9 86.2–90.0 2.75 pts — No
85% 87.4–90.7 86.5–89.7 2.29 pts — No
80% 87.6–90.5 86.6–89.5 1.93 pts — No
75% 87.8–90.4 86.8–89.4 1.64 pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 109, LVA 75
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.0–90.5 85.6–90.1 4.07 pts — No
90% 86.4–90.1 86.0–89.7 3.35 pts — No
85% 86.6–89.9 86.2–89.5 2.88 pts — No
80% 86.8–89.7 86.4–89.3 2.52 pts — No
75% 86.9–89.6 86.5–89.2 2.22 pts — No
Ice — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 109, LVA 75
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.9–91.1 85.6–89.9 3.05 pts — No
90% 87.2–90.7 86.0–89.6 2.37 pts — No
85% 87.4–90.5 86.2–89.4 1.92 pts — No
80% 87.6–90.3 86.4–89.2 1.58 pts — No
75% 87.7–90.2 86.5–89.0 1.3 pts — No
Jamal — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 109, LVA 75
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.7–91.5 85.7–90.2 3.48 pts — No
90% 87.1–91.1 86.0–89.8 2.73 pts — No
85% 87.3–90.9 86.3–89.6 2.24 pts — No
80% 87.5–90.7 86.5–89.4 1.86 pts — No
75% 87.7–90.5 86.6–89.2 1.55 pts — No
Jordan — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 109, LVA 75
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.0–91.0 86.1–89.8 2.85 pts — No
90% 87.3–90.7 86.4–89.5 2.21 pts — No
85% 87.5–90.5 86.5–89.2 1.67 pts — No
80% 87.7–90.3 86.6–89.1 1.47 pts — No
75% 87.8–90.2 86.7–89.1 1.28 pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 109, LVA 75
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.0–90.7 85.5–90.0 4.0 pts — No
90% 86.6–90.5 85.9–89.6 3.05 pts — No
85% 87.2–90.1 86.1–89.4 2.2 pts — No
80% 87.5–89.9 86.3–89.2 1.66 pts — No
75% 87.6–89.8 86.5–89.0 1.42 pts — No
Maya Jefferson — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 109, LVA 75
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.4–91.6 86.1–90.3 3.87 pts — No
90% 86.8–91.2 86.5–89.5 2.69 pts — No
85% 87.1–90.9 86.6–89.4 2.29 pts — No
80% 87.3–90.7 86.7–89.3 1.94 pts — No
75% 87.5–90.5 86.7–89.0 1.53 pts — No
Lexi — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 109, LVA 75
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.4–91.1 85.5–89.7 3.27 pts — No
90% 86.8–90.7 85.9–89.3 2.56 pts — No
85% 87.0–90.4 86.1–89.1 2.1 pts — No
80% 87.2–90.3 86.3–89.0 1.75 pts — No
75% 87.4–90.1 86.4–88.8 1.45 pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 109, LVA 75
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.6–92.4 85.3–89.9 3.37 pts — No
90% 87.0–91.9 85.7–89.6 2.53 pts — No
85% 87.3–91.6 85.9–89.3 1.97 pts — No
80% 87.6–91.4 86.1–89.1 1.55 pts — No
75% 87.8–91.2 86.2–89.0 1.2 pts — No