Clay's Almanac
WNBA · July 22, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Dallas Wings at Portland Fire

DAL 101 – POR 97

July 22, 2026 · Final

Lexi

Best model for this game

Lexi
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for DAL at POR

All 12 models’ predicted scores

DAL — one dot per model POR — one dot per model Actual: DAL 101, POR 97
Vince Chambers
DAL 83.3–89.9 POR 82.3–86.8 Overlap 3.48 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

DAL 83.8–89.4 POR 82.7–86.4 Overlap 2.59 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.2–89.0 POR 82.9–86.2 Overlap 2.02 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.5–88.8 POR 83.1–86.0 Overlap 1.57 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.7–88.6 POR 83.3–85.9 Overlap 1.2 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.6) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
11.38
p-value
1.19e-22

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
DAL 83.3–90.9 POR 82.1–87.0 Overlap 3.73 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 87.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.6) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

DAL 83.9–90.3 POR 82.5–86.6 Overlap 2.72 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 87.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.6) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.3–89.9 POR 82.7–86.4 Overlap 2.06 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 87.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.6) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.6–89.6 POR 82.9–86.2 Overlap 1.55 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 87.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.6) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.9–89.4 POR 83.1–86.0 Overlap 1.13 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 87.1) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.6) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
12.48
p-value
1.22e-25

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
DAL 84.5–90.3 POR 81.6–86.8 Overlap 2.29 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.8–89.0 POR 82.0–86.4 Overlap 1.6 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 85.0–88.6 POR 82.3–86.1 Overlap 1.06 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 85.0–88.3 POR 82.5–85.9 Overlap 0.84 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 85.2–88.1 POR 82.7–85.7 Overlap 0.51 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
12.80
p-value
2.50e-27

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
DAL 84.3–90.3 POR 81.0–86.1 Overlap 1.83 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.7–89.2 POR 81.7–85.9 Overlap 1.25 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.9–88.7 POR 82.6–85.6 Overlap 0.7 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 85.1–88.5 POR 83.0–85.5 Overlap 0.34 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 85.5–88.3 POR 83.3–85.4 No overlap Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.8) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
13.53
p-value
1.38e-29

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
DAL 83.7–90.0 POR 80.9–85.6 Overlap 1.95 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 83.3) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.1–89.3 POR 81.3–85.3 Overlap 1.15 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 83.3) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.2–88.6 POR 81.5–85.0 Overlap 0.77 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 83.3) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 84.5–88.0 POR 81.7–84.8 Overlap 0.29 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 83.3) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 84.6–87.8 POR 81.9–84.7 Overlap 0.07 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.0) over Portland Fire (avg. 83.3) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
14.28
p-value
5.02e-31

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
DAL 84.2–89.5 POR 80.5–86.4 Overlap 2.12 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 83.9) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.3–88.1 POR 81.0–85.9 Overlap 1.6 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 83.9) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.6–87.8 POR 81.4–85.7 Overlap 1.14 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 83.9) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.8–87.6 POR 82.6–85.6 Overlap 0.81 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 83.9) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 84.9–87.6 POR 82.8–85.4 Overlap 0.47 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.2) over Portland Fire (avg. 83.9) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
11.59
p-value
6.15e-24

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
DAL 84.1–90.3 POR 81.2–87.1 Overlap 2.96 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.1) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.4–89.8 POR 81.6–86.6 Overlap 2.2 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.1) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.7–89.2 POR 82.0–86.3 Overlap 1.57 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.1) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.8–88.6 POR 82.2–86.0 Overlap 1.22 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.1) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.9–88.4 POR 82.4–85.8 Overlap 0.9 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.1) — by 2.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
11.29
p-value
6.71e-23

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
DAL 83.6–89.1 POR 81.5–86.9 Overlap 3.31 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

DAL 84.0–88.7 POR 82.0–86.5 Overlap 2.45 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.3–88.4 POR 82.2–86.2 Overlap 1.88 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.5–88.2 POR 82.5–86.0 Overlap 1.45 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.7–88.0 POR 82.6–85.8 Overlap 1.09 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.3) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
12.10
p-value
1.86e-25

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
DAL 84.1–90.2 POR 81.5–86.7 Overlap 2.58 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.1) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.6–89.8 POR 81.9–86.3 Overlap 1.67 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.1) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.8–89.2 POR 82.2–86.0 Overlap 1.2 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.1) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.9–88.8 POR 82.4–85.8 Overlap 0.93 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.1) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 85.1–88.4 POR 82.5–85.6 Overlap 0.51 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.1) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
12.84
p-value
3.68e-27

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
DAL 84.7–89.5 POR 81.5–86.2 Overlap 1.51 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.3) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 84.9–89.2 POR 82.2–86.0 Overlap 1.08 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.3) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 85.1–89.0 POR 82.8–85.9 Overlap 0.83 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.3) — by 2.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 85.2–88.5 POR 83.0–85.8 Overlap 0.58 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.3) — by 2.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 85.3–88.3 POR 83.0–85.6 Overlap 0.3 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.6) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.3) — by 2.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
13.15
p-value
1.52e-28

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
DAL 84.6–90.5 POR 81.0–87.7 Overlap 3.06 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.9) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

DAL 84.8–89.9 POR 81.4–86.9 Overlap 2.09 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.9) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 85.1–89.1 POR 82.3–86.4 Overlap 1.26 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.9) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 85.2–88.8 POR 82.6–85.9 Overlap 0.73 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.9) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

DAL 85.3–88.6 POR 82.8–85.6 Overlap 0.38 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 86.9) over Portland Fire (avg. 84.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
12.47
p-value
1.34e-26

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
DAL 84.7–91.7 POR 81.4–88.1 Overlap 3.41 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 85.1) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

DAL 85.2–90.8 POR 81.8–87.1 Overlap 1.93 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 85.1) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 85.5–90.5 POR 83.1–86.9 Overlap 1.39 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 85.1) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 85.6–90.0 POR 83.6–86.8 Overlap 1.19 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 85.1) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

DAL 85.7–89.7 POR 84.0–86.5 Overlap 0.8 pts Actual: DAL 101, POR 97

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Dallas Wings (avg. 87.5) over Portland Fire (avg. 85.1) — by 2.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
9.92
p-value
6.73e-19

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 101, POR 97
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.3–89.9 82.3–86.8 3.48 pts — No
90% 83.8–89.4 82.7–86.4 2.59 pts — No
85% 84.2–89.0 82.9–86.2 2.02 pts — No
80% 84.5–88.8 83.1–86.0 1.57 pts — No
75% 84.7–88.6 83.3–85.9 1.2 pts — No
Reg — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 101, POR 97
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.3–90.9 82.1–87.0 3.73 pts — No
90% 83.9–90.3 82.5–86.6 2.72 pts — No
85% 84.3–89.9 82.7–86.4 2.06 pts — No
80% 84.6–89.6 82.9–86.2 1.55 pts — No
75% 84.9–89.4 83.1–86.0 1.13 pts — No
Dr. Wallace — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 101, POR 97
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.5–90.3 81.6–86.8 2.29 pts — No
90% 84.8–89.0 82.0–86.4 1.6 pts — No
85% 85.0–88.6 82.3–86.1 1.06 pts — No
80% 85.0–88.3 82.5–85.9 0.84 pts — No
75% 85.2–88.1 82.7–85.7 0.51 pts — No
Kevin — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 101, POR 97
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.3–90.3 81.0–86.1 1.83 pts — No
90% 84.7–89.2 81.7–85.9 1.25 pts — No
85% 84.9–88.7 82.6–85.6 0.7 pts — No
80% 85.1–88.5 83.0–85.5 0.34 pts — No
75% 85.5–88.3 83.3–85.4 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 101, POR 97
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.7–90.0 80.9–85.6 1.95 pts — No
90% 84.1–89.3 81.3–85.3 1.15 pts — No
85% 84.2–88.6 81.5–85.0 0.77 pts — No
80% 84.5–88.0 81.7–84.8 0.29 pts — No
75% 84.6–87.8 81.9–84.7 0.07 pts — No
Ice — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 101, POR 97
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.2–89.5 80.5–86.4 2.12 pts — No
90% 84.3–88.1 81.0–85.9 1.6 pts — No
85% 84.6–87.8 81.4–85.7 1.14 pts — No
80% 84.8–87.6 82.6–85.6 0.81 pts — No
75% 84.9–87.6 82.8–85.4 0.47 pts — No
Jamal — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 101, POR 97
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.1–90.3 81.2–87.1 2.96 pts — No
90% 84.4–89.8 81.6–86.6 2.2 pts — No
85% 84.7–89.2 82.0–86.3 1.57 pts — No
80% 84.8–88.6 82.2–86.0 1.22 pts — No
75% 84.9–88.4 82.4–85.8 0.9 pts — No
Jordan — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 101, POR 97
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 83.6–89.1 81.5–86.9 3.31 pts — No
90% 84.0–88.7 82.0–86.5 2.45 pts — No
85% 84.3–88.4 82.2–86.2 1.88 pts — No
80% 84.5–88.2 82.5–86.0 1.45 pts — No
75% 84.7–88.0 82.6–85.8 1.09 pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 101, POR 97
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.1–90.2 81.5–86.7 2.58 pts — No
90% 84.6–89.8 81.9–86.3 1.67 pts — No
85% 84.8–89.2 82.2–86.0 1.2 pts — No
80% 84.9–88.8 82.4–85.8 0.93 pts — No
75% 85.1–88.4 82.5–85.6 0.51 pts — No
Maya Jefferson — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 101, POR 97
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.7–89.5 81.5–86.2 1.51 pts — No
90% 84.9–89.2 82.2–86.0 1.08 pts — No
85% 85.1–89.0 82.8–85.9 0.83 pts — No
80% 85.2–88.5 83.0–85.8 0.58 pts — No
75% 85.3–88.3 83.0–85.6 0.3 pts — No
Lexi — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 101, POR 97
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–90.5 81.0–87.7 3.06 pts — No
90% 84.8–89.9 81.4–86.9 2.09 pts — No
85% 85.1–89.1 82.3–86.4 1.26 pts — No
80% 85.2–88.8 82.6–85.9 0.73 pts — No
75% 85.3–88.6 82.8–85.6 0.38 pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — DAL at POR — Actual: DAL 101, POR 97
Level DAL range POR range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.7–91.7 81.4–88.1 3.41 pts — No
90% 85.2–90.8 81.8–87.1 1.93 pts — No
85% 85.5–90.5 83.1–86.9 1.39 pts — No
80% 85.6–90.0 83.6–86.8 1.19 pts — No
75% 85.7–89.7 84.0–86.5 0.8 pts — No