Clay's Almanac
WNBA · July 22, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Las Vegas Aces at Washington Mystics

LVA 99 – WAS 100

July 22, 2026 · Final

Dr. Lila Shah

Best model for this game

Dr. Lila Shah
All models: 0-12
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for LVA at WAS

All 12 models’ predicted scores

LVA — one dot per model WAS — one dot per model Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100
Vince Chambers
LVA 85.4–91.2 WAS 79.6–85.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 5.9 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.9–90.7 WAS 80.1–84.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 5.9 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.1–90.4 WAS 80.4–84.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 5.9 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.4–90.1 WAS 80.6–84.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 5.9 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.6–89.9 WAS 80.8–84.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 5.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
32.76
p-value
7.85e-81

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
LVA 85.2–91.9 WAS 79.4–85.5 Overlap 0.32 pts Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 6.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.8–91.4 WAS 79.9–85.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 6.1 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.1–91.0 WAS 80.2–84.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 6.1 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.4–90.7 WAS 80.4–84.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 6.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.6–90.5 WAS 80.7–84.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 6.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
29.75
p-value
5.50e-74

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
LVA 86.2–91.6 WAS 80.1–84.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.8 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.5–90.9 WAS 80.5–84.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.8 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.7–90.4 WAS 80.7–84.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.8 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.9–90.2 WAS 80.9–84.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.8 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.0–89.6 WAS 81.1–83.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
34.43
p-value
2.38e-82

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
LVA 85.7–91.4 WAS 80.3–84.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 6.2 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–90.9 WAS 80.6–84.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 6.2 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.5–90.6 WAS 80.8–83.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 6.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.7–90.4 WAS 81.0–83.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 6.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.9–90.2 WAS 81.1–83.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 6.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
38.81
p-value
3.66e-89

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
LVA 86.0–92.0 WAS 80.3–85.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.7) — by 5.5 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.3–91.3 WAS 80.7–84.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.7) — by 5.5 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.4–90.7 WAS 81.0–84.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.7) — by 5.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.6–89.8 WAS 81.1–84.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.7) — by 5.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.7–89.6 WAS 81.3–84.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.7) — by 5.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
28.44
p-value
6.67e-66

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
LVA 85.5–90.6 WAS 80.1–84.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 5.7 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–90.2 WAS 80.5–84.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 5.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–90.0 WAS 80.7–84.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 5.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.4–89.8 WAS 80.9–83.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 5.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.6–89.6 WAS 81.1–83.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.4) — by 5.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
36.47
p-value
2.30e-88

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
LVA 86.1–91.2 WAS 80.3–85.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.7) — by 5.5 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.3–90.0 WAS 80.7–84.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.7) — by 5.5 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.5–89.9 WAS 80.9–84.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.7) — by 5.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.7–89.5 WAS 81.1–84.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.7) — by 5.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.8–89.3 WAS 81.3–84.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.7) — by 5.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
32.80
p-value
1.01e-79

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
LVA 85.8–92.1 WAS 80.1–84.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.7 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.1–90.5 WAS 80.5–84.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.3–90.0 WAS 80.8–84.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.5–89.9 WAS 81.0–84.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.7–89.6 WAS 81.1–83.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
30.47
p-value
5.35e-71

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
LVA 85.7–91.0 WAS 79.6–85.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.8 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.1–90.6 WAS 80.1–85.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.8 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.4–90.3 WAS 80.4–84.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.8 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.6–90.1 WAS 80.6–84.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.8 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.8–89.9 WAS 80.8–84.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
32.84
p-value
7.13e-81

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
LVA 86.2–90.9 WAS 79.9–85.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.7 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.6–90.4 WAS 80.3–84.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.7 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.7–90.3 WAS 80.6–84.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.9–90.2 WAS 80.8–84.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.0–89.8 WAS 81.0–84.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
32.23
p-value
1.59e-79

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
LVA 86.0–91.4 WAS 80.0–84.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.9 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.2–90.9 WAS 80.4–84.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.9 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.4–90.7 WAS 80.7–84.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.9 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.5–90.6 WAS 80.8–84.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.9 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.7–90.0 WAS 81.0–83.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.5) — by 5.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
31.98
p-value
5.48e-76

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
LVA 85.7–93.1 WAS 79.7–84.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.1) — by 7.3 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.3–92.5 WAS 80.0–84.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.1) — by 7.3 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.6–92.1 WAS 80.3–83.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.1) — by 7.3 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.9–91.8 WAS 80.5–83.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.1) — by 7.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.2–91.5 WAS 80.6–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.1) — by 7.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
36.31
p-value
7.74e-81

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — LVA at WAS — Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100
Level LVA range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.4–91.2 79.6–85.1 — pts — No
90% 85.9–90.7 80.1–84.7 — pts — No
85% 86.1–90.4 80.4–84.4 — pts — No
80% 86.4–90.1 80.6–84.2 — pts — No
75% 86.6–89.9 80.8–84.0 — pts — No
Reg — LVA at WAS — Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100
Level LVA range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.2–91.9 79.4–85.5 0.32 pts — No
90% 85.8–91.4 79.9–85.0 — pts — No
85% 86.1–91.0 80.2–84.7 — pts — No
80% 86.4–90.7 80.4–84.5 — pts — No
75% 86.6–90.5 80.7–84.3 — pts — No
Dr. Wallace — LVA at WAS — Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100
Level LVA range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.2–91.6 80.1–84.8 — pts — No
90% 86.5–90.9 80.5–84.4 — pts — No
85% 86.7–90.4 80.7–84.2 — pts — No
80% 86.9–90.2 80.9–84.0 — pts — No
75% 87.0–89.6 81.1–83.8 — pts — No
Kevin — LVA at WAS — Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100
Level LVA range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.7–91.4 80.3–84.5 — pts — No
90% 86.2–90.9 80.6–84.1 — pts — No
85% 86.5–90.6 80.8–83.9 — pts — No
80% 86.7–90.4 81.0–83.8 — pts — No
75% 86.9–90.2 81.1–83.6 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — LVA at WAS — Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100
Level LVA range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.0–92.0 80.3–85.0 — pts — No
90% 86.3–91.3 80.7–84.6 — pts — No
85% 86.4–90.7 81.0–84.4 — pts — No
80% 86.6–89.8 81.1–84.2 — pts — No
75% 86.7–89.6 81.3–84.1 — pts — No
Ice — LVA at WAS — Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100
Level LVA range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.5–90.6 80.1–84.7 — pts — No
90% 86.0–90.2 80.5–84.4 — pts — No
85% 86.2–90.0 80.7–84.1 — pts — No
80% 86.4–89.8 80.9–83.9 — pts — No
75% 86.6–89.6 81.1–83.8 — pts — No
Jamal — LVA at WAS — Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100
Level LVA range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.1–91.2 80.3–85.1 — pts — No
90% 86.3–90.0 80.7–84.7 — pts — No
85% 86.5–89.9 80.9–84.4 — pts — No
80% 86.7–89.5 81.1–84.2 — pts — No
75% 86.8–89.3 81.3–84.1 — pts — No
Jordan — LVA at WAS — Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100
Level LVA range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.8–92.1 80.1–84.8 — pts — No
90% 86.1–90.5 80.5–84.4 — pts — No
85% 86.3–90.0 80.8–84.2 — pts — No
80% 86.5–89.9 81.0–84.0 — pts — No
75% 86.7–89.6 81.1–83.8 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — LVA at WAS — Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100
Level LVA range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.7–91.0 79.6–85.4 — pts — No
90% 86.1–90.6 80.1–85.0 — pts — No
85% 86.4–90.3 80.4–84.7 — pts — No
80% 86.6–90.1 80.6–84.4 — pts — No
75% 86.8–89.9 80.8–84.2 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — LVA at WAS — Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100
Level LVA range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.2–90.9 79.9–85.2 — pts — No
90% 86.6–90.4 80.3–84.8 — pts — No
85% 86.7–90.3 80.6–84.5 — pts — No
80% 86.9–90.2 80.8–84.3 — pts — No
75% 87.0–89.8 81.0–84.1 — pts — No
Lexi — LVA at WAS — Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100
Level LVA range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.0–91.4 80.0–84.9 — pts — No
90% 86.2–90.9 80.4–84.5 — pts — No
85% 86.4–90.7 80.7–84.3 — pts — No
80% 86.5–90.6 80.8–84.1 — pts — No
75% 86.7–90.0 81.0–83.9 — pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — LVA at WAS — Actual: LVA 99, WAS 100
Level LVA range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.7–93.1 79.7–84.5 — pts — No
90% 86.3–92.5 80.0–84.1 — pts — No
85% 86.6–92.1 80.3–83.8 — pts — No
80% 86.9–91.8 80.5–83.6 — pts — No
75% 87.2–91.5 80.6–83.5 — pts — No