Clay's Almanac
WNBA · July 22, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Phoenix Mercury at Los Angeles Sparks

PHX 86 – LAS 82

July 22, 2026 · Final

Ice

Best model for this game

Ice
All models: 0-12
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for PHX at LAS

All 12 models’ predicted scores

PHX — one dot per model LAS — one dot per model Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82
Vince Chambers
PHX 81.4–86.4 LAS 83.5–89.8 Overlap 2.89 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.8–86.0 LAS 84.0–89.3 Overlap 1.98 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.1–85.7 LAS 84.3–88.9 Overlap 1.39 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.3–85.5 LAS 84.6–88.7 Overlap 0.94 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.4–85.4 LAS 84.8–88.5 Overlap 0.57 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
-15.14
p-value
3.30e-34

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
PHX 81.5–86.6 LAS 83.2–90.7 Overlap 3.37 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 87.0) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

PHX 81.9–86.2 LAS 83.8–90.1 Overlap 2.33 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 87.0) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.2–85.9 LAS 84.2–89.7 Overlap 1.72 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 87.0) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.5–85.7 LAS 84.5–89.4 Overlap 1.21 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 87.0) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.6–85.5 LAS 84.8–89.2 Overlap 0.73 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 87.0) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
-13.45
p-value
2.12e-29

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
PHX 81.7–86.0 LAS 83.7–89.4 Overlap 2.31 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.7) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.9–85.7 LAS 84.2–89.0 Overlap 1.5 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.7) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.0–85.4 LAS 84.5–88.7 Overlap 0.89 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.7) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.0–85.2 LAS 84.7–88.4 Overlap 0.54 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.7) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.4–85.2 LAS 84.9–88.2 Overlap 0.29 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.7) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
-15.78
p-value
1.22e-36

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
PHX 81.9–86.1 LAS 83.7–89.6 Overlap 2.37 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.4–85.8 LAS 84.2–89.1 Overlap 1.62 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.6–85.5 LAS 84.5–88.8 Overlap 1.0 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.8–85.4 LAS 84.7–88.5 Overlap 0.64 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.9–85.2 LAS 84.9–88.4 Overlap 0.32 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
-16.02
p-value
5.21e-37

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
PHX 80.6–85.3 LAS 83.8–88.9 Overlap 1.56 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.0) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.0–84.9 LAS 84.1–88.7 Overlap 0.88 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.0) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 81.2–84.7 LAS 84.2–88.3 Overlap 0.49 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.0) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 81.4–84.5 LAS 84.4–88.0 Overlap 0.15 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.0) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 81.6–84.3 LAS 84.4–87.4 No overlap Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 85.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.0) — by 2.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
-16.37
p-value
2.08e-37

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
PHX 81.5–86.5 LAS 84.5–88.8 Overlap 2.04 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.1) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.9–86.1 LAS 84.6–88.3 Overlap 1.51 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.1) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.2–85.9 LAS 84.8–87.8 Overlap 1.1 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.1) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.4–85.7 LAS 84.8–87.6 Overlap 0.82 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.1) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) — by 2.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.6–85.5 LAS 84.9–87.5 Overlap 0.54 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.1) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) — by 2.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
-12.70
p-value
2.91e-27

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
PHX 81.8–86.0 LAS 84.2–90.2 Overlap 1.82 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.5) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.0–85.6 LAS 84.3–88.7 Overlap 1.22 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.5) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.3–85.4 LAS 84.7–88.6 Overlap 0.76 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.5) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.6–85.3 LAS 84.9–88.2 Overlap 0.34 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.5) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.7–85.2 LAS 85.1–87.9 Overlap 0.04 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.5) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
-14.04
p-value
3.81e-31

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
PHX 81.4–86.4 LAS 83.4–89.2 Overlap 3.06 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.3) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

PHX 81.8–86.0 LAS 83.8–88.7 Overlap 2.19 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.3) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.1–85.8 LAS 84.2–88.4 Overlap 1.62 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.3) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.3–85.6 LAS 84.4–88.2 Overlap 1.19 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.3) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.5–85.4 LAS 84.6–88.0 Overlap 0.83 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.3) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.9) — by 2.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
-13.55
p-value
1.08e-29

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
PHX 81.5–86.0 LAS 83.2–89.5 Overlap 2.88 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.7) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.8–85.7 LAS 83.7–89.0 Overlap 2.0 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.7) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.1–85.4 LAS 84.0–88.7 Overlap 1.43 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.7) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.2–85.2 LAS 84.3–88.4 Overlap 0.98 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.7) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.4–85.1 LAS 84.5–88.2 Overlap 0.62 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.7) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
-14.67
p-value
2.39e-32

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
PHX 80.9–86.7 LAS 83.7–89.0 Overlap 3.0 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

PHX 81.4–86.2 LAS 84.1–88.6 Overlap 2.1 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.7–85.9 LAS 84.4–88.3 Overlap 1.52 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.9–85.7 LAS 84.6–88.1 Overlap 1.08 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.1–85.5 LAS 84.8–87.9 Overlap 0.7 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) — by 2.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
-14.40
p-value
2.25e-32

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
PHX 81.5–85.7 LAS 84.2–89.7 Overlap 1.47 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.8–85.4 LAS 84.3–88.9 Overlap 1.1 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.0–85.4 LAS 84.6–88.4 Overlap 0.75 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.2–85.3 LAS 84.6–88.0 Overlap 0.61 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.5–85.1 LAS 84.9–87.9 Overlap 0.23 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.4) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
-13.61
p-value
9.23e-30

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
PHX 81.1–85.9 LAS 84.0–89.0 Overlap 1.82 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.0) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.5) — by 2.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.4–85.5 LAS 84.2–88.1 Overlap 1.24 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.0) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.5) — by 2.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.7–85.2 LAS 84.4–87.8 Overlap 0.84 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.0) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.5) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 81.9–85.0 LAS 84.4–87.6 Overlap 0.63 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.0) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.5) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.0–84.9 LAS 84.5–87.5 Overlap 0.36 pts Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 86.0) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.5) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
-14.27
p-value
1.57e-31

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — PHX at LAS — Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82
Level PHX range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.4–86.4 83.5–89.8 2.89 pts — No
90% 81.8–86.0 84.0–89.3 1.98 pts — No
85% 82.1–85.7 84.3–88.9 1.39 pts — No
80% 82.3–85.5 84.6–88.7 0.94 pts — No
75% 82.4–85.4 84.8–88.5 0.57 pts — No
Reg — PHX at LAS — Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82
Level PHX range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.5–86.6 83.2–90.7 3.37 pts — No
90% 81.9–86.2 83.8–90.1 2.33 pts — No
85% 82.2–85.9 84.2–89.7 1.72 pts — No
80% 82.5–85.7 84.5–89.4 1.21 pts — No
75% 82.6–85.5 84.8–89.2 0.73 pts — No
Dr. Wallace — PHX at LAS — Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82
Level PHX range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.7–86.0 83.7–89.4 2.31 pts — No
90% 81.9–85.7 84.2–89.0 1.5 pts — No
85% 82.0–85.4 84.5–88.7 0.89 pts — No
80% 82.0–85.2 84.7–88.4 0.54 pts — No
75% 82.4–85.2 84.9–88.2 0.29 pts — No
Kevin — PHX at LAS — Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82
Level PHX range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.9–86.1 83.7–89.6 2.37 pts — No
90% 82.4–85.8 84.2–89.1 1.62 pts — No
85% 82.6–85.5 84.5–88.8 1.0 pts — No
80% 82.8–85.4 84.7–88.5 0.64 pts — No
75% 82.9–85.2 84.9–88.4 0.32 pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — PHX at LAS — Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82
Level PHX range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.6–85.3 83.8–88.9 1.56 pts — No
90% 81.0–84.9 84.1–88.7 0.88 pts — No
85% 81.2–84.7 84.2–88.3 0.49 pts — No
80% 81.4–84.5 84.4–88.0 0.15 pts — No
75% 81.6–84.3 84.4–87.4 — pts — No
Ice — PHX at LAS — Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82
Level PHX range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.5–86.5 84.5–88.8 2.04 pts — No
90% 81.9–86.1 84.6–88.3 1.51 pts — No
85% 82.2–85.9 84.8–87.8 1.1 pts — No
80% 82.4–85.7 84.8–87.6 0.82 pts — No
75% 82.6–85.5 84.9–87.5 0.54 pts — No
Jamal — PHX at LAS — Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82
Level PHX range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.8–86.0 84.2–90.2 1.82 pts — No
90% 82.0–85.6 84.3–88.7 1.22 pts — No
85% 82.3–85.4 84.7–88.6 0.76 pts — No
80% 82.6–85.3 84.9–88.2 0.34 pts — No
75% 82.7–85.2 85.1–87.9 0.04 pts — No
Jordan — PHX at LAS — Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82
Level PHX range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.4–86.4 83.4–89.2 3.06 pts — No
90% 81.8–86.0 83.8–88.7 2.19 pts — No
85% 82.1–85.8 84.2–88.4 1.62 pts — No
80% 82.3–85.6 84.4–88.2 1.19 pts — No
75% 82.5–85.4 84.6–88.0 0.83 pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — PHX at LAS — Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82
Level PHX range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.5–86.0 83.2–89.5 2.88 pts — No
90% 81.8–85.7 83.7–89.0 2.0 pts — No
85% 82.1–85.4 84.0–88.7 1.43 pts — No
80% 82.2–85.2 84.3–88.4 0.98 pts — No
75% 82.4–85.1 84.5–88.2 0.62 pts — No
Maya Jefferson — PHX at LAS — Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82
Level PHX range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.9–86.7 83.7–89.0 3.0 pts — No
90% 81.4–86.2 84.1–88.6 2.1 pts — No
85% 81.7–85.9 84.4–88.3 1.52 pts — No
80% 81.9–85.7 84.6–88.1 1.08 pts — No
75% 82.1–85.5 84.8–87.9 0.7 pts — No
Lexi — PHX at LAS — Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82
Level PHX range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.5–85.7 84.2–89.7 1.47 pts — No
90% 81.8–85.4 84.3–88.9 1.1 pts — No
85% 82.0–85.4 84.6–88.4 0.75 pts — No
80% 82.2–85.3 84.6–88.0 0.61 pts — No
75% 82.5–85.1 84.9–87.9 0.23 pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — PHX at LAS — Actual: PHX 86, LAS 82
Level PHX range LAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.1–85.9 84.0–89.0 1.82 pts — No
90% 81.4–85.5 84.2–88.1 1.24 pts — No
85% 81.7–85.2 84.4–87.8 0.84 pts — No
80% 81.9–85.0 84.4–87.6 0.63 pts — No
75% 82.0–84.9 84.5–87.5 0.36 pts — No