Clay's Almanac
WNBA · August 1, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Las Vegas Aces at Chicago Sky

LVA 18 – CHI 14

August 1, 2026 · Final

Dr. Lila Shah

Best model for this game

Dr. Lila Shah
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for LVA at CHI

All 12 models’ predicted scores

LVA — one dot per model CHI — one dot per model Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14
Vince Chambers Tol Warning
LVA 86.1–93.4 CHI 84.7–94.4 Overlap 7.3 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.7) over Chicago Sky (avg. 89.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.7–92.8 CHI 85.5–93.7 Overlap 6.13 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.7) over Chicago Sky (avg. 89.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 87.0–92.4 CHI 86.0–93.1 Overlap 5.37 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.7) over Chicago Sky (avg. 89.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 87.3–92.1 CHI 86.4–92.8 Overlap 4.78 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.7) over Chicago Sky (avg. 89.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 87.6–91.9 CHI 86.7–92.4 Overlap 4.29 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.7) over Chicago Sky (avg. 89.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
0.38
p-value
7.03e-01

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg Tol Warning
LVA 85.3–93.6 CHI 82.9–95.3 Overlap 8.28 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.4) over Chicago Sky (avg. 89.1) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.0–92.9 CHI 83.9–94.3 Overlap 6.96 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.4) over Chicago Sky (avg. 89.1) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.4–92.5 CHI 84.6–93.6 Overlap 6.09 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.4) over Chicago Sky (avg. 89.1) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.7–92.1 CHI 85.1–93.1 Overlap 5.42 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.4) over Chicago Sky (avg. 89.1) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 87.0–91.9 CHI 85.5–92.7 Overlap 4.87 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.4) over Chicago Sky (avg. 89.1) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
0.64
p-value
5.28e-01

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace Tol Warning
LVA 84.6–93.0 CHI 83.6–93.2 Overlap 8.35 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.3–92.3 CHI 84.3–92.4 Overlap 7.01 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.7–91.9 CHI 84.8–91.9 Overlap 6.14 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.1–91.5 CHI 85.2–91.5 Overlap 5.44 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.4–91.3 CHI 85.5–91.2 Overlap 4.84 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
0.97
p-value
3.38e-01

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin Tol Warning
LVA 84.5–93.5 CHI 82.5–94.2 Overlap 8.96 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.2–92.7 CHI 83.4–93.3 Overlap 7.52 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.7–92.3 CHI 84.0–92.7 Overlap 6.58 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.1–91.9 CHI 84.5–92.2 Overlap 5.86 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.4–91.6 CHI 84.9–91.8 Overlap 5.26 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
1.20
p-value
2.37e-01

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah Tol Warning
LVA 84.9–91.2 CHI 81.7–91.1 Overlap 6.17 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.4) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.4–90.7 CHI 82.5–90.3 Overlap 4.91 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.4) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.7–90.3 CHI 82.9–89.8 Overlap 4.1 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.4) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.0–90.1 CHI 83.3–89.5 Overlap 3.47 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.4) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.2–89.9 CHI 83.6–89.1 Overlap 2.94 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.4) — by 1.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
4.10
p-value
1.48e-04

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice Tol Warning
LVA 86.3–91.7 CHI 80.6–93.5 Overlap 5.39 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.1) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.5–91.5 CHI 81.7–92.5 Overlap 5.04 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.1) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.5–91.2 CHI 82.4–91.8 Overlap 4.68 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.1) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.6–90.9 CHI 82.9–91.3 Overlap 4.29 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.1) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.7–90.8 CHI 83.3–90.9 Overlap 4.19 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.1) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
2.28
p-value
2.70e-02

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal Tol Warning
LVA 86.1–91.4 CHI 82.9–91.1 Overlap 4.97 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.0) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.2–90.7 CHI 83.5–89.7 Overlap 3.45 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.0) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.4–90.2 CHI 84.2–89.5 Overlap 3.1 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.0) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.6–89.4 CHI 84.2–88.7 Overlap 2.1 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.0) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.8–89.2 CHI 84.9–88.4 Overlap 1.52 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.0) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
2.38
p-value
2.10e-02

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan Tol Warning
LVA 84.9–91.1 CHI 81.9–91.8 Overlap 6.24 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.8) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.4–90.6 CHI 82.7–91.0 Overlap 5.24 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.8) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.7–90.3 CHI 83.2–90.5 Overlap 4.59 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.8) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.9–90.0 CHI 83.6–90.1 Overlap 4.09 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.8) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.2–89.8 CHI 84.0–89.7 Overlap 3.57 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.0) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.8) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
2.75
p-value
8.24e-03

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin Tol Warning
LVA 85.4–90.4 CHI 81.6–91.8 Overlap 4.95 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.8–90.0 CHI 82.5–91.0 Overlap 4.15 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.1–89.7 CHI 83.0–90.5 Overlap 3.64 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.3–89.5 CHI 83.4–90.1 Overlap 3.24 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.4–89.3 CHI 83.7–89.7 Overlap 2.91 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.9) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
2.84
p-value
6.86e-03

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson Tol Warning
LVA 85.2–90.9 CHI 83.8–89.4 Overlap 4.16 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.7–90.5 CHI 83.9–88.9 Overlap 3.23 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.0–90.2 CHI 84.1–88.8 Overlap 2.83 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.2–89.9 CHI 84.1–88.8 Overlap 2.58 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.4–89.7 CHI 84.2–88.7 Overlap 2.36 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Chicago Sky (avg. 86.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
2.74
p-value
8.76e-03

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi Tol Warning
LVA 84.8–92.4 CHI 82.9–91.1 Overlap 6.33 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.3) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.4–91.8 CHI 83.1–90.9 Overlap 5.55 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.3) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.8–91.4 CHI 83.3–90.6 Overlap 4.87 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.3) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.1–91.1 CHI 83.6–90.3 Overlap 4.2 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.3) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.3–90.9 CHI 83.7–90.2 Overlap 3.82 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Chicago Sky (avg. 87.3) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
2.41
p-value
1.97e-02

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe Tol Warning
LVA 84.9–92.6 CHI 82.9–93.4 Overlap 7.72 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.2) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.5–92.0 CHI 83.8–92.6 Overlap 6.48 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.2) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.9–91.6 CHI 84.3–92.0 Overlap 5.67 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.2) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.3–91.3 CHI 84.7–91.6 Overlap 5.05 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.2) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.5–91.0 CHI 85.1–91.3 Overlap 4.54 pts Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Chicago Sky (avg. 88.2) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
1.28
p-value
2.05e-01

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — LVA at CHI — Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14
Level LVA range CHI range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.1–93.4 84.7–94.4 7.3 pts Yes No
90% 86.7–92.8 85.5–93.7 6.13 pts Yes No
85% 87.0–92.4 86.0–93.1 5.37 pts Yes No
80% 87.3–92.1 86.4–92.8 4.78 pts Yes No
75% 87.6–91.9 86.7–92.4 4.29 pts Yes No
Reg — LVA at CHI — Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14
Level LVA range CHI range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.3–93.6 82.9–95.3 8.28 pts Yes No
90% 86.0–92.9 83.9–94.3 6.96 pts Yes No
85% 86.4–92.5 84.6–93.6 6.09 pts Yes No
80% 86.7–92.1 85.1–93.1 5.42 pts Yes No
75% 87.0–91.9 85.5–92.7 4.87 pts Yes No
Dr. Wallace — LVA at CHI — Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14
Level LVA range CHI range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–93.0 83.6–93.2 8.35 pts Yes No
90% 85.3–92.3 84.3–92.4 7.01 pts Yes No
85% 85.7–91.9 84.8–91.9 6.14 pts Yes No
80% 86.1–91.5 85.2–91.5 5.44 pts Yes No
75% 86.4–91.3 85.5–91.2 4.84 pts Yes No
Kevin — LVA at CHI — Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14
Level LVA range CHI range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.5–93.5 82.5–94.2 8.96 pts Yes No
90% 85.2–92.7 83.4–93.3 7.52 pts Yes No
85% 85.7–92.3 84.0–92.7 6.58 pts Yes No
80% 86.1–91.9 84.5–92.2 5.86 pts Yes No
75% 86.4–91.6 84.9–91.8 5.26 pts Yes No
Dr. Lila Shah — LVA at CHI — Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14
Level LVA range CHI range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.9–91.2 81.7–91.1 6.17 pts Yes No
90% 85.4–90.7 82.5–90.3 4.91 pts Yes No
85% 85.7–90.3 82.9–89.8 4.1 pts Yes No
80% 86.0–90.1 83.3–89.5 3.47 pts Yes No
75% 86.2–89.9 83.6–89.1 2.94 pts Yes No
Ice — LVA at CHI — Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14
Level LVA range CHI range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.3–91.7 80.6–93.5 5.39 pts Yes No
90% 86.5–91.5 81.7–92.5 5.04 pts Yes No
85% 86.5–91.2 82.4–91.8 4.68 pts Yes No
80% 86.6–90.9 82.9–91.3 4.29 pts Yes No
75% 86.7–90.8 83.3–90.9 4.19 pts Yes No
Jamal — LVA at CHI — Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14
Level LVA range CHI range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.1–91.4 82.9–91.1 4.97 pts Yes No
90% 86.2–90.7 83.5–89.7 3.45 pts Yes No
85% 86.4–90.2 84.2–89.5 3.1 pts Yes No
80% 86.6–89.4 84.2–88.7 2.1 pts Yes No
75% 86.8–89.2 84.9–88.4 1.52 pts Yes No
Jordan — LVA at CHI — Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14
Level LVA range CHI range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.9–91.1 81.9–91.8 6.24 pts Yes No
90% 85.4–90.6 82.7–91.0 5.24 pts Yes No
85% 85.7–90.3 83.2–90.5 4.59 pts Yes No
80% 85.9–90.0 83.6–90.1 4.09 pts Yes No
75% 86.2–89.8 84.0–89.7 3.57 pts Yes No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — LVA at CHI — Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14
Level LVA range CHI range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.4–90.4 81.6–91.8 4.95 pts Yes No
90% 85.8–90.0 82.5–91.0 4.15 pts Yes No
85% 86.1–89.7 83.0–90.5 3.64 pts Yes No
80% 86.3–89.5 83.4–90.1 3.24 pts Yes No
75% 86.4–89.3 83.7–89.7 2.91 pts Yes No
Maya Jefferson — LVA at CHI — Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14
Level LVA range CHI range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.2–90.9 83.8–89.4 4.16 pts Yes No
90% 85.7–90.5 83.9–88.9 3.23 pts Yes No
85% 86.0–90.2 84.1–88.8 2.83 pts Yes No
80% 86.2–89.9 84.1–88.8 2.58 pts Yes No
75% 86.4–89.7 84.2–88.7 2.36 pts Yes No
Lexi — LVA at CHI — Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14
Level LVA range CHI range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.8–92.4 82.9–91.1 6.33 pts Yes No
90% 85.4–91.8 83.1–90.9 5.55 pts Yes No
85% 85.8–91.4 83.3–90.6 4.87 pts Yes No
80% 86.1–91.1 83.6–90.3 4.2 pts Yes No
75% 86.3–90.9 83.7–90.2 3.82 pts Yes No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — LVA at CHI — Actual: LVA 18, CHI 14
Level LVA range CHI range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.9–92.6 82.9–93.4 7.72 pts Yes No
90% 85.5–92.0 83.8–92.6 6.48 pts Yes No
85% 85.9–91.6 84.3–92.0 5.67 pts Yes No
80% 86.3–91.3 84.7–91.6 5.05 pts Yes No
75% 86.5–91.0 85.1–91.3 4.54 pts Yes No