Clay's Almanac
WNBA · August 9, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Phoenix Mercury at Washington Mystics

PHX 75 – WAS 95

August 9, 2026 · Final

Darren "Dimes" Lin

Best model for this game

Darren "Dimes" Lin
All models: 0-12
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for PHX at WAS

All 12 models’ predicted scores

PHX — one dot per model WAS — one dot per model Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95
Vince Chambers
PHX 81.7–86.6 WAS 79.4–84.3 Overlap 2.6 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.1–86.2 WAS 79.8–83.9 Overlap 1.82 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.4–85.9 WAS 80.1–83.7 Overlap 1.31 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.6–85.7 WAS 80.3–83.5 Overlap 0.92 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.7–85.6 WAS 80.4–83.3 Overlap 0.59 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
15.92
p-value
2.40e-39

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
PHX 81.7–87.2 WAS 79.9–84.7 Overlap 2.92 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.2–86.7 WAS 80.3–84.3 Overlap 2.1 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.4–86.4 WAS 80.5–84.0 Overlap 1.57 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.7–86.2 WAS 80.7–83.8 Overlap 1.16 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.8–86.0 WAS 80.9–83.7 Overlap 0.81 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.3) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
14.57
p-value
1.10e-34

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
PHX 81.8–86.8 WAS 79.8–84.0 Overlap 2.17 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.6–86.3 WAS 80.0–83.5 Overlap 0.94 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.9–86.0 WAS 80.6–83.2 Overlap 0.31 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.1–86.0 WAS 80.6–83.1 Overlap 0.03 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.2–85.9 WAS 80.8–83.0 No overlap Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
15.50
p-value
1.28e-37

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
PHX 81.1–86.9 WAS 79.6–84.1 Overlap 2.98 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.6–86.5 WAS 80.0–83.7 Overlap 2.15 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 81.9–86.2 WAS 80.2–83.5 Overlap 1.62 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.1–85.9 WAS 80.4–83.3 Overlap 1.2 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.3–85.7 WAS 80.5–83.2 Overlap 0.86 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.9) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
14.25
p-value
3.39e-33

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
PHX 81.7–86.9 WAS 79.7–83.7 Overlap 1.96 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.0–86.5 WAS 80.0–83.3 Overlap 1.35 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.1–85.8 WAS 80.2–83.1 Overlap 1.06 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.2–85.4 WAS 80.4–83.0 Overlap 0.74 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.5–85.2 WAS 80.5–82.8 Overlap 0.34 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 83.8) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
14.55
p-value
1.71e-33

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
PHX 82.3–86.6 WAS 79.4–83.9 Overlap 1.54 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.6) — by 2.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.6–86.0 WAS 79.7–83.5 Overlap 0.93 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.6) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.7–85.8 WAS 80.0–83.3 Overlap 0.54 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.6) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.9–85.7 WAS 80.2–83.1 Overlap 0.26 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.6) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.9–85.4 WAS 80.3–83.0 Overlap 0.01 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.6) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
17.86
p-value
1.05e-45

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
PHX 81.8–86.6 WAS 79.7–84.3 Overlap 2.53 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.2–86.2 WAS 80.0–83.8 Overlap 1.6 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.4–86.0 WAS 80.4–83.5 Overlap 1.09 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.6–85.8 WAS 80.5–83.0 Overlap 0.41 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.8–85.6 WAS 80.8–82.9 Overlap 0.16 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
15.74
p-value
9.97e-39

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
PHX 82.2–87.5 WAS 79.8–84.3 Overlap 2.13 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.4–86.3 WAS 80.2–83.7 Overlap 1.36 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.7–86.0 WAS 80.3–83.5 Overlap 0.79 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.8–85.8 WAS 80.9–83.2 Overlap 0.44 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.9–85.7 WAS 81.0–83.1 Overlap 0.24 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
14.04
p-value
1.42e-32

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
PHX 82.1–86.2 WAS 79.8–84.2 Overlap 2.12 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.4–85.7 WAS 80.2–83.8 Overlap 1.41 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.6–85.5 WAS 80.4–83.6 Overlap 1.04 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.8–85.3 WAS 80.6–83.4 Overlap 0.64 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.8–85.3 WAS 80.7–83.3 Overlap 0.47 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
13.95
p-value
2.15e-32

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
PHX 82.0–86.3 WAS 80.3–84.1 Overlap 2.1 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.4–85.8 WAS 80.4–83.3 Overlap 0.94 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.7–85.7 WAS 80.7–83.2 Overlap 0.52 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.9–85.6 WAS 80.8–83.1 Overlap 0.18 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.2–85.5 WAS 80.9–83.0 No overlap Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.0) — by 2.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
16.40
p-value
6.37e-41

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
PHX 82.3–86.7 WAS 79.2–84.3 Overlap 2.04 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 2.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.4–86.4 WAS 79.6–83.9 Overlap 1.53 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 2.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 82.7–86.3 WAS 79.9–83.6 Overlap 0.97 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 82.9–86.1 WAS 80.1–83.4 Overlap 0.57 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.0–85.7 WAS 80.3–83.3 Overlap 0.28 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 84.2) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.8) — by 2.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
16.23
p-value
2.26e-40

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
PHX 82.8–88.7 WAS 79.3–84.2 Overlap 1.33 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

PHX 83.2–88.1 WAS 79.7–83.8 Overlap 0.62 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.3–87.0 WAS 79.9–83.5 Overlap 0.25 pts Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

PHX 83.3–86.8 WAS 80.1–83.3 No overlap Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 3.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

PHX 83.4–86.7 WAS 80.3–83.2 No overlap Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 81.7) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
19.50
p-value
8.81e-50

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — PHX at WAS — Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95
Level PHX range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.7–86.6 79.4–84.3 2.6 pts — No
90% 82.1–86.2 79.8–83.9 1.82 pts — No
85% 82.4–85.9 80.1–83.7 1.31 pts — No
80% 82.6–85.7 80.3–83.5 0.92 pts — No
75% 82.7–85.6 80.4–83.3 0.59 pts — No
Reg — PHX at WAS — Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95
Level PHX range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.7–87.2 79.9–84.7 2.92 pts — No
90% 82.2–86.7 80.3–84.3 2.1 pts — No
85% 82.4–86.4 80.5–84.0 1.57 pts — No
80% 82.7–86.2 80.7–83.8 1.16 pts — No
75% 82.8–86.0 80.9–83.7 0.81 pts — No
Dr. Wallace — PHX at WAS — Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95
Level PHX range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.8–86.8 79.8–84.0 2.17 pts — No
90% 82.6–86.3 80.0–83.5 0.94 pts — No
85% 82.9–86.0 80.6–83.2 0.31 pts — No
80% 83.1–86.0 80.6–83.1 0.03 pts — No
75% 83.2–85.9 80.8–83.0 — pts — No
Kevin — PHX at WAS — Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95
Level PHX range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.1–86.9 79.6–84.1 2.98 pts — No
90% 81.6–86.5 80.0–83.7 2.15 pts — No
85% 81.9–86.2 80.2–83.5 1.62 pts — No
80% 82.1–85.9 80.4–83.3 1.2 pts — No
75% 82.3–85.7 80.5–83.2 0.86 pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — PHX at WAS — Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95
Level PHX range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.7–86.9 79.7–83.7 1.96 pts — No
90% 82.0–86.5 80.0–83.3 1.35 pts — No
85% 82.1–85.8 80.2–83.1 1.06 pts — No
80% 82.2–85.4 80.4–83.0 0.74 pts — No
75% 82.5–85.2 80.5–82.8 0.34 pts — No
Ice — PHX at WAS — Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95
Level PHX range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.3–86.6 79.4–83.9 1.54 pts — No
90% 82.6–86.0 79.7–83.5 0.93 pts — No
85% 82.7–85.8 80.0–83.3 0.54 pts — No
80% 82.9–85.7 80.2–83.1 0.26 pts — No
75% 82.9–85.4 80.3–83.0 0.01 pts — No
Jamal — PHX at WAS — Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95
Level PHX range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.8–86.6 79.7–84.3 2.53 pts — No
90% 82.2–86.2 80.0–83.8 1.6 pts — No
85% 82.4–86.0 80.4–83.5 1.09 pts — No
80% 82.6–85.8 80.5–83.0 0.41 pts — No
75% 82.8–85.6 80.8–82.9 0.16 pts — No
Jordan — PHX at WAS — Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95
Level PHX range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.2–87.5 79.8–84.3 2.13 pts — No
90% 82.4–86.3 80.2–83.7 1.36 pts — No
85% 82.7–86.0 80.3–83.5 0.79 pts — No
80% 82.8–85.8 80.9–83.2 0.44 pts — No
75% 82.9–85.7 81.0–83.1 0.24 pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — PHX at WAS — Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95
Level PHX range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.1–86.2 79.8–84.2 2.12 pts — No
90% 82.4–85.7 80.2–83.8 1.41 pts — No
85% 82.6–85.5 80.4–83.6 1.04 pts — No
80% 82.8–85.3 80.6–83.4 0.64 pts — No
75% 82.8–85.3 80.7–83.3 0.47 pts — No
Maya Jefferson — PHX at WAS — Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95
Level PHX range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.0–86.3 80.3–84.1 2.1 pts — No
90% 82.4–85.8 80.4–83.3 0.94 pts — No
85% 82.7–85.7 80.7–83.2 0.52 pts — No
80% 82.9–85.6 80.8–83.1 0.18 pts — No
75% 83.2–85.5 80.9–83.0 — pts — No
Lexi — PHX at WAS — Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95
Level PHX range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.3–86.7 79.2–84.3 2.04 pts — No
90% 82.4–86.4 79.6–83.9 1.53 pts — No
85% 82.7–86.3 79.9–83.6 0.97 pts — No
80% 82.9–86.1 80.1–83.4 0.57 pts — No
75% 83.0–85.7 80.3–83.3 0.28 pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — PHX at WAS — Actual: PHX 75, WAS 95
Level PHX range WAS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.8–88.7 79.3–84.2 1.33 pts — No
90% 83.2–88.1 79.7–83.8 0.62 pts — No
85% 83.3–87.0 79.9–83.5 0.25 pts — No
80% 83.3–86.8 80.1–83.3 — pts — No
75% 83.4–86.7 80.3–83.2 — pts — No