Clay's Almanac
WNBA · August 13, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Washington Mystics at Las Vegas Aces

WAS 76 – LVA 83

August 13, 2026 · Final

Vince Chambers

Best model for this game

Vince Chambers
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for WAS at LVA

All 12 models’ predicted scores

WAS — one dot per model LVA — one dot per model Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83
Vince Chambers
WAS 80.5–85.4 LVA 86.4–93.6 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 7.0 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.9–85.0 LVA 87.0–93.0 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 7.0 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.2–84.8 LVA 87.4–92.7 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 7.0 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.4–84.6 LVA 87.6–92.4 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 7.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.6–84.4 LVA 87.9–92.1 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 7.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
-42.94
p-value
2.42e-120

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
WAS 80.2–85.9 LVA 85.9–94.3 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 7.0 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.6–85.4 LVA 86.6–93.6 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 7.0 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.9–85.1 LVA 87.0–93.1 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 7.0 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.1–84.9 LVA 87.3–92.8 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 7.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.3–84.7 LVA 87.6–92.5 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 7.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
-36.94
p-value
3.20e-106

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
WAS 79.9–86.1 LVA 85.3–93.4 Overlap 0.8 pts Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 6.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

WAS 80.4–85.6 LVA 85.9–92.7 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 6.3 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.7–85.2 LVA 86.3–92.3 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 6.3 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.9–85.0 LVA 86.7–92.0 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 6.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.1–84.8 LVA 86.9–91.7 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.0) — by 6.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
-33.20
p-value
5.38e-99

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
WAS 80.0–85.9 LVA 85.2–92.5 Overlap 0.69 pts Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

WAS 80.5–85.4 LVA 85.8–91.9 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.9 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.8–85.1 LVA 86.2–91.5 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.9 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.0–84.9 LVA 86.4–91.2 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.9 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.2–84.7 LVA 86.7–90.9 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
-33.19
p-value
3.99e-100

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
WAS 79.4–85.7 LVA 85.7–92.1 Overlap 0.09 pts Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.6) — by 5.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

WAS 79.9–85.2 LVA 85.8–91.2 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.6) — by 5.5 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.2–84.9 LVA 85.9–90.4 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.6) — by 5.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.5–84.6 LVA 86.2–90.1 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.6) — by 5.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.7–84.4 LVA 86.4–89.6 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.6) — by 5.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
-30.94
p-value
1.44e-94

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
WAS 80.1–86.0 LVA 85.5–91.6 Overlap 0.48 pts Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) — by 5.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

WAS 80.6–85.5 LVA 86.5–91.3 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) — by 5.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.9–85.2 LVA 86.8–91.1 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) — by 5.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.1–85.0 LVA 86.9–90.5 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) — by 5.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.3–84.8 LVA 87.1–90.2 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) — by 5.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
-32.47
p-value
2.77e-99

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
WAS 79.7–85.8 LVA 85.2–92.5 Overlap 0.63 pts Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.8) — by 5.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

WAS 80.2–85.4 LVA 85.9–91.5 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.8) — by 5.5 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.6–85.0 LVA 86.3–90.8 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.8) — by 5.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.8–84.8 LVA 86.5–90.5 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.8) — by 5.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.0–84.6 LVA 86.7–90.2 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.8) — by 5.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
-30.70
p-value
1.23e-92

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
WAS 79.3–86.5 LVA 85.7–92.4 Overlap 0.79 pts Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

WAS 79.8–85.9 LVA 86.2–91.4 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.5 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.2–85.5 LVA 86.4–90.9 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.5–85.2 LVA 86.5–90.4 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.8–85.0 LVA 86.6–90.1 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
-28.12
p-value
9.16e-86

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
WAS 79.6–86.1 LVA 85.0–91.9 Overlap 1.07 pts Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

WAS 80.1–85.6 LVA 85.6–91.4 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.6 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.5–85.2 LVA 85.9–91.0 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.7–85.0 LVA 86.2–90.7 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.0–84.8 LVA 86.5–90.5 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
-31.65
p-value
3.61e-97

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
WAS 80.3–85.9 LVA 85.7–92.3 Overlap 0.21 pts Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) — by 5.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

WAS 80.5–85.6 LVA 86.0–91.4 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) — by 5.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.7–85.2 LVA 86.4–91.1 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) — by 5.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.4–84.6 LVA 86.5–90.7 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) — by 5.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.6–84.5 LVA 86.6–90.6 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.1) — by 5.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
-29.28
p-value
1.53e-88

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
WAS 79.8–86.1 LVA 85.8–92.6 Overlap 0.3 pts Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

WAS 80.3–85.6 LVA 85.9–91.9 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.6–85.3 LVA 86.2–91.3 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 80.9–85.0 LVA 86.4–91.0 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.1–84.8 LVA 86.5–90.6 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) over Washington Mystics (avg. 82.9) — by 5.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
-28.17
p-value
5.14e-84

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
WAS 80.9–85.7 LVA 85.9–92.5 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.5) — by 5.1 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.5–85.5 LVA 86.3–91.4 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.5) — by 5.1 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 81.8–85.3 LVA 86.5–91.1 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.5) — by 5.1 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 82.0–85.1 LVA 86.6–90.6 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.5) — by 5.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

WAS 82.2–84.8 LVA 86.8–90.4 No overlap Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.6) over Washington Mystics (avg. 83.5) — by 5.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
-29.17
p-value
1.68e-86

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — WAS at LVA — Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83
Level WAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.5–85.4 86.4–93.6 — pts — No
90% 80.9–85.0 87.0–93.0 — pts — No
85% 81.2–84.8 87.4–92.7 — pts — No
80% 81.4–84.6 87.6–92.4 — pts — No
75% 81.6–84.4 87.9–92.1 — pts — No
Reg — WAS at LVA — Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83
Level WAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.2–85.9 85.9–94.3 — pts — No
90% 80.6–85.4 86.6–93.6 — pts — No
85% 80.9–85.1 87.0–93.1 — pts — No
80% 81.1–84.9 87.3–92.8 — pts — No
75% 81.3–84.7 87.6–92.5 — pts — No
Dr. Wallace — WAS at LVA — Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83
Level WAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.9–86.1 85.3–93.4 0.8 pts — No
90% 80.4–85.6 85.9–92.7 — pts — No
85% 80.7–85.2 86.3–92.3 — pts — No
80% 80.9–85.0 86.7–92.0 — pts — No
75% 81.1–84.8 86.9–91.7 — pts — No
Kevin — WAS at LVA — Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83
Level WAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.0–85.9 85.2–92.5 0.69 pts — No
90% 80.5–85.4 85.8–91.9 — pts — No
85% 80.8–85.1 86.2–91.5 — pts — No
80% 81.0–84.9 86.4–91.2 — pts — No
75% 81.2–84.7 86.7–90.9 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — WAS at LVA — Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83
Level WAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.4–85.7 85.7–92.1 0.09 pts — No
90% 79.9–85.2 85.8–91.2 — pts — No
85% 80.2–84.9 85.9–90.4 — pts — No
80% 80.5–84.6 86.2–90.1 — pts — No
75% 80.7–84.4 86.4–89.6 — pts — No
Ice — WAS at LVA — Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83
Level WAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.1–86.0 85.5–91.6 0.48 pts — No
90% 80.6–85.5 86.5–91.3 — pts — No
85% 80.9–85.2 86.8–91.1 — pts — No
80% 81.1–85.0 86.9–90.5 — pts — No
75% 81.3–84.8 87.1–90.2 — pts — No
Jamal — WAS at LVA — Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83
Level WAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.7–85.8 85.2–92.5 0.63 pts — No
90% 80.2–85.4 85.9–91.5 — pts — No
85% 80.6–85.0 86.3–90.8 — pts — No
80% 80.8–84.8 86.5–90.5 — pts — No
75% 81.0–84.6 86.7–90.2 — pts — No
Jordan — WAS at LVA — Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83
Level WAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.3–86.5 85.7–92.4 0.79 pts — No
90% 79.8–85.9 86.2–91.4 — pts — No
85% 80.2–85.5 86.4–90.9 — pts — No
80% 80.5–85.2 86.5–90.4 — pts — No
75% 80.8–85.0 86.6–90.1 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — WAS at LVA — Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83
Level WAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.6–86.1 85.0–91.9 1.07 pts — No
90% 80.1–85.6 85.6–91.4 — pts — No
85% 80.5–85.2 85.9–91.0 — pts — No
80% 80.7–85.0 86.2–90.7 — pts — No
75% 81.0–84.8 86.5–90.5 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — WAS at LVA — Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83
Level WAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.3–85.9 85.7–92.3 0.21 pts — No
90% 80.5–85.6 86.0–91.4 — pts — No
85% 80.7–85.2 86.4–91.1 — pts — No
80% 81.4–84.6 86.5–90.7 — pts — No
75% 81.6–84.5 86.6–90.6 — pts — No
Lexi — WAS at LVA — Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83
Level WAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.8–86.1 85.8–92.6 0.3 pts — No
90% 80.3–85.6 85.9–91.9 — pts — No
85% 80.6–85.3 86.2–91.3 — pts — No
80% 80.9–85.0 86.4–91.0 — pts — No
75% 81.1–84.8 86.5–90.6 — pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — WAS at LVA — Actual: WAS 76, LVA 83
Level WAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.9–85.7 85.9–92.5 — pts — No
90% 81.5–85.5 86.3–91.4 — pts — No
85% 81.8–85.3 86.5–91.1 — pts — No
80% 82.0–85.1 86.6–90.6 — pts — No
75% 82.2–84.8 86.8–90.4 — pts — No