Clay's Almanac
WNBA · September 18, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
NFL
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

New York Liberty at Minnesota Lynx

NY 93 – MIN 81

September 18, 2026 · Final

Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for NY at MIN

All 10 models’ predicted scores

NY — one dot per model MIN — one dot per model Actual: NY 93, MIN 81
Vince Chambers Tol Warning
NY 84.9–95.4 MIN 83.1–94.6 Overlap 9.79 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 85.7–94.6 MIN 84.0–93.7 Overlap 8.05 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.2–94.0 MIN 84.6–93.1 Overlap 6.91 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.7–93.6 MIN 85.1–92.7 Overlap 6.03 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 87.0–93.3 MIN 85.5–92.3 Overlap 5.3 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.9) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
1.69
p-value
1.11e-01

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg Tol Warning
NY 87.1–94.6 MIN 84.5–93.0 Overlap 5.89 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.8) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 87.7–94.0 MIN 85.2–92.3 Overlap 4.63 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.8) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 88.1–93.6 MIN 85.6–91.9 Overlap 3.8 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.8) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 88.4–93.3 MIN 86.0–91.6 Overlap 3.17 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.8) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 88.7–93.1 MIN 86.3–91.3 Overlap 2.64 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.8) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
3.94
p-value
1.22e-03

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace Tol Warning
NY 85.9–95.2 MIN 83.8–94.4 Overlap 8.46 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.6) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 89.1) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.7–94.5 MIN 84.7–93.6 Overlap 6.89 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.6) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 89.1) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 87.2–94.0 MIN 85.2–93.0 Overlap 5.87 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.6) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 89.1) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 87.5–93.6 MIN 85.6–92.6 Overlap 5.08 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.6) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 89.1) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 87.8–93.3 MIN 86.0–92.3 Overlap 4.42 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.6) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 89.1) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
2.22
p-value
4.17e-02

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin Tol Warning
NY 85.1–95.2 MIN 83.6–93.4 Overlap 8.39 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.5) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 85.9–94.4 MIN 84.3–92.7 Overlap 6.81 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.5) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.4–93.8 MIN 84.8–92.2 Overlap 5.78 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.5) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.8–93.4 MIN 85.2–91.8 Overlap 4.98 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.5) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 87.1–93.1 MIN 85.6–91.4 Overlap 4.32 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.5) — by 1.6 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
2.42
p-value
2.78e-02

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah Tol Warning
NY 84.5–94.6 MIN 83.1–93.1 Overlap 8.6 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 89.5) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.1) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 85.3–93.8 MIN 83.9–92.3 Overlap 7.01 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 89.5) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.1) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 85.8–93.2 MIN 84.4–91.8 Overlap 5.98 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 89.5) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.1) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.2–92.8 MIN 84.8–91.4 Overlap 5.18 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 89.5) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.1) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.5–92.5 MIN 85.1–91.1 Overlap 4.51 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 89.5) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.1) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
2.14
p-value
4.79e-02

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice Tol Warning
NY 85.2–95.1 MIN 84.1–90.2 Overlap 5.06 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 87.2) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 85.9–94.3 MIN 84.6–89.7 Overlap 3.8 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 87.2) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.5–93.8 MIN 84.9–89.4 Overlap 2.97 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 87.2) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

NY 86.8–93.4 MIN 85.2–89.2 Overlap 2.33 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 87.2) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

NY 87.2–93.1 MIN 85.4–89.0 Overlap 1.8 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.1) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 87.2) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
5.37
p-value
1.19e-04

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal Tol Warning
NY 85.5–93.9 MIN 83.9–90.9 Overlap 5.44 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 89.7) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 87.4) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.1–93.3 MIN 84.5–90.4 Overlap 4.22 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 89.7) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 87.4) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.6–92.8 MIN 84.8–90.0 Overlap 3.42 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 89.7) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 87.4) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.9–92.5 MIN 85.1–89.7 Overlap 2.8 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 89.7) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 87.4) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

NY 87.2–92.2 MIN 85.3–89.5 Overlap 2.29 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 89.7) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 87.4) — by 2.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
4.45
p-value
4.39e-04

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan Tol Warning
NY 85.4–95.3 MIN 84.4–92.7 Overlap 7.32 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.3) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.5) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.2–94.5 MIN 85.1–92.0 Overlap 5.89 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.3) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.5) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.7–94.0 MIN 85.5–91.6 Overlap 4.94 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.3) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.5) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 87.1–93.6 MIN 85.8–91.3 Overlap 4.22 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.3) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.5) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 87.4–93.3 MIN 86.1–91.0 Overlap 3.61 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.3) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.5) — by 1.8 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
2.93
p-value
1.00e-02

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin Tol Warning
NY 79.8–101.9 MIN 79.8–97.7 Overlap 17.88 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.8) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 81.6–100.2 MIN 81.2–96.3 Overlap 14.76 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.8) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 82.7–99.1 MIN 82.1–95.4 Overlap 12.71 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.8) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 83.6–98.2 MIN 82.8–94.7 Overlap 11.13 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.8) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 84.3–97.5 MIN 83.4–94.1 Overlap 9.81 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.8) — by 2.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
1.62
p-value
1.38e-01

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson Tol Warning
NY 82.7–99.1 MIN 83.5–93.0 Overlap 9.57 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 84.0–97.9 MIN 84.2–92.3 Overlap 8.09 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 84.8–97.0 MIN 84.7–91.8 Overlap 6.98 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 85.5–96.4 MIN 85.1–91.4 Overlap 5.96 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

NY 86.0–95.8 MIN 85.4–91.1 Overlap 5.1 pts Actual: NY 93, MIN 81

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans New York Liberty (avg. 90.9) over Minnesota Lynx (avg. 88.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
3.20
p-value
1.69e-02

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — NY at MIN — Actual: NY 93, MIN 81
Level NY range MIN range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.9–95.4 83.1–94.6 9.79 pts Yes No
90% 85.7–94.6 84.0–93.7 8.05 pts Yes No
85% 86.2–94.0 84.6–93.1 6.91 pts Yes No
80% 86.7–93.6 85.1–92.7 6.03 pts Yes No
75% 87.0–93.3 85.5–92.3 5.3 pts Yes No
Reg — NY at MIN — Actual: NY 93, MIN 81
Level NY range MIN range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.1–94.6 84.5–93.0 5.89 pts Yes No
90% 87.7–94.0 85.2–92.3 4.63 pts Yes No
85% 88.1–93.6 85.6–91.9 3.8 pts Yes No
80% 88.4–93.3 86.0–91.6 3.17 pts Yes No
75% 88.7–93.1 86.3–91.3 2.64 pts Yes No
Dr. Wallace — NY at MIN — Actual: NY 93, MIN 81
Level NY range MIN range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.9–95.2 83.8–94.4 8.46 pts Yes No
90% 86.7–94.5 84.7–93.6 6.89 pts Yes No
85% 87.2–94.0 85.2–93.0 5.87 pts Yes No
80% 87.5–93.6 85.6–92.6 5.08 pts Yes No
75% 87.8–93.3 86.0–92.3 4.42 pts Yes No
Kevin — NY at MIN — Actual: NY 93, MIN 81
Level NY range MIN range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.1–95.2 83.6–93.4 8.39 pts Yes No
90% 85.9–94.4 84.3–92.7 6.81 pts Yes No
85% 86.4–93.8 84.8–92.2 5.78 pts Yes No
80% 86.8–93.4 85.2–91.8 4.98 pts Yes No
75% 87.1–93.1 85.6–91.4 4.32 pts Yes No
Dr. Lila Shah — NY at MIN — Actual: NY 93, MIN 81
Level NY range MIN range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.5–94.6 83.1–93.1 8.6 pts Yes No
90% 85.3–93.8 83.9–92.3 7.01 pts Yes No
85% 85.8–93.2 84.4–91.8 5.98 pts Yes No
80% 86.2–92.8 84.8–91.4 5.18 pts Yes No
75% 86.5–92.5 85.1–91.1 4.51 pts Yes No
Ice — NY at MIN — Actual: NY 93, MIN 81
Level NY range MIN range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.2–95.1 84.1–90.2 5.06 pts Yes No
90% 85.9–94.3 84.6–89.7 3.8 pts Yes No
85% 86.5–93.8 84.9–89.4 2.97 pts Yes No
80% 86.8–93.4 85.2–89.2 2.33 pts Yes No
75% 87.2–93.1 85.4–89.0 1.8 pts Yes No
Jamal — NY at MIN — Actual: NY 93, MIN 81
Level NY range MIN range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.5–93.9 83.9–90.9 5.44 pts Yes No
90% 86.1–93.3 84.5–90.4 4.22 pts Yes No
85% 86.6–92.8 84.8–90.0 3.42 pts Yes No
80% 86.9–92.5 85.1–89.7 2.8 pts Yes No
75% 87.2–92.2 85.3–89.5 2.29 pts Yes No
Jordan — NY at MIN — Actual: NY 93, MIN 81
Level NY range MIN range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.4–95.3 84.4–92.7 7.32 pts Yes No
90% 86.2–94.5 85.1–92.0 5.89 pts Yes No
85% 86.7–94.0 85.5–91.6 4.94 pts Yes No
80% 87.1–93.6 85.8–91.3 4.22 pts Yes No
75% 87.4–93.3 86.1–91.0 3.61 pts Yes No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — NY at MIN — Actual: NY 93, MIN 81
Level NY range MIN range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.8–101.9 79.8–97.7 17.88 pts Yes Yes
90% 81.6–100.2 81.2–96.3 14.76 pts Yes No
85% 82.7–99.1 82.1–95.4 12.71 pts Yes No
80% 83.6–98.2 82.8–94.7 11.13 pts Yes No
75% 84.3–97.5 83.4–94.1 9.81 pts Yes No
Maya Jefferson — NY at MIN — Actual: NY 93, MIN 81
Level NY range MIN range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 82.7–99.1 83.5–93.0 9.57 pts Yes No
90% 84.0–97.9 84.2–92.3 8.09 pts Yes No
85% 84.8–97.0 84.7–91.8 6.98 pts Yes No
80% 85.5–96.4 85.1–91.4 5.96 pts Yes No
75% 86.0–95.8 85.4–91.1 5.1 pts Yes No