Clay's Almanac
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
NFL
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Washington Mystics at Indiana Fever

WAS 93 – IND 77

September 20, 2026 · Final

Reg

Best model for this game

Reg
All models: 0-2
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for WAS at IND

All 2 models’ predicted scores

WAS — one dot per model IND — one dot per model Actual: WAS 93, IND 77
Vince Chambers Tol Warning
WAS 84.9–88.7 IND 81.4–100.4 Overlap 3.86 pts Actual: WAS 93, IND 77

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.9) over Washington Mystics (avg. 86.8) — by 4.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

WAS 85.2–88.4 IND 82.9–98.9 Overlap 3.27 pts Actual: WAS 93, IND 77

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.9) over Washington Mystics (avg. 86.8) — by 4.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

WAS 85.4–88.2 IND 83.9–97.9 Overlap 2.87 pts Actual: WAS 93, IND 77

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.9) over Washington Mystics (avg. 86.8) — by 4.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

WAS 85.5–88.1 IND 84.6–97.2 Overlap 2.57 pts Actual: WAS 93, IND 77

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.9) over Washington Mystics (avg. 86.8) — by 4.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

WAS 85.7–88.0 IND 85.2–96.6 Overlap 2.31 pts Actual: WAS 93, IND 77

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.9) over Washington Mystics (avg. 86.8) — by 4.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
-4.79
p-value
7.10e-03

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg Tol Warning
WAS 80.5–95.1 IND 87.5–95.5 Overlap 7.55 pts Actual: WAS 93, IND 77

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 87.8) — by 3.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

WAS 81.6–94.0 IND 88.2–94.9 Overlap 5.81 pts Actual: WAS 93, IND 77

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 87.8) — by 3.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

WAS 82.4–93.2 IND 88.6–94.5 Overlap 4.66 pts Actual: WAS 93, IND 77

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 87.8) — by 3.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

WAS 83.0–92.7 IND 88.9–94.2 Overlap 3.77 pts Actual: WAS 93, IND 77

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 87.8) — by 3.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

WAS 83.4–92.2 IND 89.1–93.9 Overlap 3.03 pts Actual: WAS 93, IND 77

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Washington Mystics (avg. 87.8) — by 3.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
-5.09
p-value
2.05e-03

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — WAS at IND — Actual: WAS 93, IND 77
Level WAS range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.9–88.7 81.4–100.4 3.86 pts Yes No
90% 85.2–88.4 82.9–98.9 3.27 pts Yes No
85% 85.4–88.2 83.9–97.9 2.87 pts Yes No
80% 85.5–88.1 84.6–97.2 2.57 pts Yes No
75% 85.7–88.0 85.2–96.6 2.31 pts Yes No
Reg — WAS at IND — Actual: WAS 93, IND 77
Level WAS range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.5–95.1 87.5–95.5 7.55 pts Yes No
90% 81.6–94.0 88.2–94.9 5.81 pts Yes No
85% 82.4–93.2 88.6–94.5 4.66 pts Yes No
80% 83.0–92.7 88.9–94.2 3.77 pts Yes No
75% 83.4–92.2 89.1–93.9 3.03 pts Yes No