Clay's Almanac
WNBA · September 22, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
NFL
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Los Angeles Sparks at Las Vegas Aces

LAS 79 – LVA 89

September 22, 2026 · Final

Dr. Lila Shah

Best model for this game

Dr. Lila Shah
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for LAS at LVA

All 12 models’ predicted scores

LAS — one dot per model LVA — one dot per model Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89
Vince Chambers
LAS 80.6–85.8 LVA 84.8–89.7 Overlap 0.95 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.4–85.4 LVA 85.2–89.3 Overlap 0.16 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.7–85.2 LVA 85.5–89.0 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.7 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.9–85.0 LVA 85.7–88.8 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.7 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.1–84.9 LVA 85.8–88.7 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.5) — by 3.7 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
-29.61
p-value
1.72e-99

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
LAS 80.6–85.7 LVA 84.9–89.9 Overlap 0.8 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.4) — by 4.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.2–85.5 LVA 85.3–89.5 Overlap 0.21 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.4) — by 4.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.8–85.3 LVA 85.6–89.3 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.4) — by 4.0 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.0–85.1 LVA 85.8–89.1 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.4) — by 4.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.2–84.9 LVA 85.9–88.9 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.4) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.4) — by 4.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
-31.82
p-value
1.71e-108

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
LAS 81.3–86.0 LVA 85.3–89.6 Overlap 0.68 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.5–85.1 LVA 85.5–89.0 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.6–84.7 LVA 85.8–88.8 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.9–84.6 LVA 86.0–88.5 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.0–84.5 LVA 86.1–88.3 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
-32.16
p-value
5.56e-110

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
LAS 81.3–85.9 LVA 85.1–89.4 Overlap 0.78 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.5–85.4 LVA 85.4–89.2 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.6–85.0 LVA 85.7–88.9 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.9–84.8 LVA 85.8–88.7 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.1–84.5 LVA 85.9–88.4 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
-32.78
p-value
2.95e-112

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
LAS 80.3–86.0 LVA 84.5–90.1 Overlap 1.52 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 80.7–85.5 LVA 84.9–89.6 Overlap 0.62 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.0–85.2 LVA 85.2–89.3 Overlap 0.04 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.3–85.0 LVA 85.4–89.1 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.5–84.8 LVA 85.6–88.9 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
-30.27
p-value
8.28e-103

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
LAS 81.0–85.5 LVA 84.3–89.4 Overlap 1.18 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 81.5–85.1 LVA 84.7–89.0 Overlap 0.38 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.7–84.8 LVA 85.0–88.7 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.9–84.7 LVA 85.2–88.5 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.2–84.5 LVA 85.4–88.4 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
-30.27
p-value
8.63e-103

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
LAS 80.2–85.9 LVA 84.7–90.0 Overlap 1.2 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 80.7–85.5 LVA 85.0–89.3 Overlap 0.51 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.0–85.2 LVA 85.2–88.9 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.0 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.2–84.9 LVA 85.6–88.6 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.4–84.7 LVA 85.8–88.4 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
-29.14
p-value
1.75e-98

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
LAS 80.6–85.3 LVA 84.5–89.7 Overlap 0.79 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.4–84.8 LVA 84.9–89.2 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.0 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.7–84.7 LVA 85.2–89.0 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.0 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.8–84.5 LVA 85.4–88.8 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.9–84.4 LVA 85.6–88.6 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.1) — by 4.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
-33.28
p-value
5.84e-114

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
LAS 81.1–85.6 LVA 84.8–89.7 Overlap 0.75 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.5–85.2 LVA 85.2–89.3 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.7–85.0 LVA 85.5–89.0 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.9–84.8 LVA 85.7–88.8 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 82.0–84.6 LVA 85.8–88.7 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.3) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.3) — by 3.9 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
-35.03
p-value
7.35e-120

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
LAS 80.6–85.7 LVA 84.9–89.7 Overlap 0.8 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.0–85.3 LVA 85.2–89.3 Overlap 0.12 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.3–85.0 LVA 85.3–89.0 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.8 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.5–84.8 LVA 85.5–88.7 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.8 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.7–84.6 LVA 85.6–88.5 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
-29.88
p-value
6.05e-101

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
LAS 80.7–85.4 LVA 84.5–89.6 Overlap 0.95 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.0–85.2 LVA 84.9–89.2 Overlap 0.34 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LAS 81.4–84.9 LVA 85.1–88.9 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.8 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.6–84.7 LVA 85.3–88.7 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.8 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 81.9–84.5 LVA 85.5–88.5 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.0) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 83.2) — by 3.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
-30.37
p-value
3.97e-103

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
LAS 79.9–85.2 LVA 82.7–88.5 Overlap 2.48 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 85.9) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 82.3) — by 3.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 80.4–84.6 LVA 83.6–88.1 Overlap 1.02 pts Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 85.9) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 82.3) — by 3.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LAS 80.6–84.1 LVA 84.2–87.8 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 85.9) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 82.3) — by 3.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 80.7–83.8 LVA 84.5–87.6 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 85.9) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 82.3) — by 3.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LAS 80.9–83.6 LVA 84.8–87.4 No overlap Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 85.9) over Los Angeles Sparks (avg. 82.3) — by 3.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
-25.95
p-value
1.18e-85

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — LAS at LVA — Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89
Level LAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.6–85.8 84.8–89.7 0.95 pts — No
90% 81.4–85.4 85.2–89.3 0.16 pts — No
85% 81.7–85.2 85.5–89.0 — pts — No
80% 81.9–85.0 85.7–88.8 — pts — No
75% 82.1–84.9 85.8–88.7 — pts — No
Reg — LAS at LVA — Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89
Level LAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.6–85.7 84.9–89.9 0.8 pts — No
90% 81.2–85.5 85.3–89.5 0.21 pts — No
85% 81.8–85.3 85.6–89.3 — pts — No
80% 82.0–85.1 85.8–89.1 — pts — No
75% 82.2–84.9 85.9–88.9 — pts — No
Dr. Wallace — LAS at LVA — Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89
Level LAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.3–86.0 85.3–89.6 0.68 pts — No
90% 81.5–85.1 85.5–89.0 — pts — No
85% 81.6–84.7 85.8–88.8 — pts — No
80% 81.9–84.6 86.0–88.5 — pts — No
75% 82.0–84.5 86.1–88.3 — pts — No
Kevin — LAS at LVA — Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89
Level LAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.3–85.9 85.1–89.4 0.78 pts — No
90% 81.5–85.4 85.4–89.2 — pts — No
85% 81.6–85.0 85.7–88.9 — pts — No
80% 81.9–84.8 85.8–88.7 — pts — No
75% 82.1–84.5 85.9–88.4 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — LAS at LVA — Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89
Level LAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.3–86.0 84.5–90.1 1.52 pts — No
90% 80.7–85.5 84.9–89.6 0.62 pts — No
85% 81.0–85.2 85.2–89.3 0.04 pts — No
80% 81.3–85.0 85.4–89.1 — pts — No
75% 81.5–84.8 85.6–88.9 — pts — No
Ice — LAS at LVA — Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89
Level LAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.0–85.5 84.3–89.4 1.18 pts — No
90% 81.5–85.1 84.7–89.0 0.38 pts — No
85% 81.7–84.8 85.0–88.7 — pts — No
80% 81.9–84.7 85.2–88.5 — pts — No
75% 82.2–84.5 85.4–88.4 — pts — No
Jamal — LAS at LVA — Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89
Level LAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.2–85.9 84.7–90.0 1.2 pts — No
90% 80.7–85.5 85.0–89.3 0.51 pts — No
85% 81.0–85.2 85.2–88.9 — pts — No
80% 81.2–84.9 85.6–88.6 — pts — No
75% 81.4–84.7 85.8–88.4 — pts — No
Jordan — LAS at LVA — Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89
Level LAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.6–85.3 84.5–89.7 0.79 pts — No
90% 81.4–84.8 84.9–89.2 — pts — No
85% 81.7–84.7 85.2–89.0 — pts — No
80% 81.8–84.5 85.4–88.8 — pts — No
75% 81.9–84.4 85.6–88.6 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — LAS at LVA — Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89
Level LAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 81.1–85.6 84.8–89.7 0.75 pts — No
90% 81.5–85.2 85.2–89.3 — pts — No
85% 81.7–85.0 85.5–89.0 — pts — No
80% 81.9–84.8 85.7–88.8 — pts — No
75% 82.0–84.6 85.8–88.7 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — LAS at LVA — Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89
Level LAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.6–85.7 84.9–89.7 0.8 pts — No
90% 81.0–85.3 85.2–89.3 0.12 pts — No
85% 81.3–85.0 85.3–89.0 — pts — No
80% 81.5–84.8 85.5–88.7 — pts — No
75% 81.7–84.6 85.6–88.5 — pts — No
Lexi — LAS at LVA — Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89
Level LAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 80.7–85.4 84.5–89.6 0.95 pts — No
90% 81.0–85.2 84.9–89.2 0.34 pts — No
85% 81.4–84.9 85.1–88.9 — pts — No
80% 81.6–84.7 85.3–88.7 — pts — No
75% 81.9–84.5 85.5–88.5 — pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — LAS at LVA — Actual: LAS 79, LVA 89
Level LAS range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 79.9–85.2 82.7–88.5 2.48 pts — No
90% 80.4–84.6 83.6–88.1 1.02 pts — No
85% 80.6–84.1 84.2–87.8 — pts — No
80% 80.7–83.8 84.5–87.6 — pts — No
75% 80.9–83.6 84.8–87.4 — pts — No