Clay's Almanac
WNBA · September 24, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
NFL
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Las Vegas Aces at Phoenix Mercury

LVA 100 – PHX 82

September 24, 2026 · Final

Dr. Lila Shah

Best model for this game

Dr. Lila Shah
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for LVA at PHX

All 12 models’ predicted scores

LVA — one dot per model PHX — one dot per model Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82
Vince Chambers
LVA 84.4–89.4 PHX 83.7–88.1 Overlap 3.78 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 84.8–89.0 PHX 84.0–87.7 Overlap 2.93 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.0–88.7 PHX 84.2–87.4 Overlap 2.33 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.2–88.5 PHX 84.4–87.1 Overlap 1.85 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.4–88.4 PHX 84.5–87.0 Overlap 1.55 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
9.54
p-value
1.73e-19

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
LVA 84.6–89.8 PHX 83.7–88.6 Overlap 3.97 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 86.0) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.0–89.4 PHX 84.2–88.1 Overlap 3.07 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 86.0) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.3–89.1 PHX 84.3–87.7 Overlap 2.35 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 86.0) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.5–88.9 PHX 84.5–87.5 Overlap 1.96 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 86.0) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.7–88.7 PHX 84.7–87.4 Overlap 1.68 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 86.0) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
9.24
p-value
1.75e-18

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
LVA 84.6–89.5 PHX 83.4–88.2 Overlap 3.56 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.5) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.0–88.6 PHX 83.8–87.5 Overlap 2.45 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.5) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.2–88.5 PHX 84.0–87.1 Overlap 1.96 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.5) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.2–88.1 PHX 84.1–87.0 Overlap 1.82 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.5) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.4–87.9 PHX 84.2–86.8 Overlap 1.36 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.7) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.5) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
9.71
p-value
5.05e-20

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
LVA 84.4–89.1 PHX 83.9–88.2 Overlap 3.75 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 84.8–88.7 PHX 84.1–87.4 Overlap 2.62 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.1–88.5 PHX 84.3–87.1 Overlap 2.03 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.3–88.3 PHX 84.3–86.9 Overlap 1.69 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.4–88.1 PHX 84.5–86.8 Overlap 1.34 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
10.52
p-value
6.77e-23

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
LVA 84.5–89.7 PHX 82.8–88.4 Overlap 3.85 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.0–88.9 PHX 83.3–87.9 Overlap 2.9 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.2–88.7 PHX 83.6–87.6 Overlap 2.42 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.3–88.5 PHX 83.8–87.4 Overlap 2.07 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.6–88.2 PHX 84.0–87.2 Overlap 1.66 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
9.82
p-value
1.92e-20

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
LVA 84.5–89.0 PHX 83.8–88.0 Overlap 3.53 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.1–88.1 PHX 84.0–87.4 Overlap 2.38 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.2–88.0 PHX 84.2–87.3 Overlap 2.11 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.3–87.9 PHX 84.3–87.1 Overlap 1.8 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.5–87.8 PHX 84.4–86.9 Overlap 1.45 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.6) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
8.85
p-value
3.43e-17

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
LVA 84.5–89.0 PHX 83.6–88.3 Overlap 3.79 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 84.9–88.6 PHX 83.9–87.9 Overlap 3.06 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.1–88.4 PHX 84.2–87.4 Overlap 2.28 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.3–88.2 PHX 84.4–87.2 Overlap 1.94 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.4–88.1 PHX 84.5–87.0 Overlap 1.59 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
9.15
p-value
3.75e-18

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
LVA 84.6–89.5 PHX 83.3–88.3 Overlap 3.7 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.1–88.8 PHX 83.7–87.9 Overlap 2.77 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.3–88.4 PHX 84.0–87.5 Overlap 2.24 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.5–88.2 PHX 84.2–87.5 Overlap 1.98 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.7–88.1 PHX 84.3–87.2 Overlap 1.57 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
9.72
p-value
5.06e-20

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
LVA 84.6–89.1 PHX 83.9–88.9 Overlap 4.35 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.8) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.0–88.8 PHX 84.3–88.1 Overlap 3.18 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.8) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.2–88.5 PHX 84.4–87.5 Overlap 2.31 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.8) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.4–88.3 PHX 84.6–87.3 Overlap 1.9 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.8) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.5–88.2 PHX 84.6–87.1 Overlap 1.61 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.9) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.8) — by 1.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
8.80
p-value
5.08e-17

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
LVA 84.6–89.7 PHX 83.7–88.5 Overlap 3.87 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.1–88.7 PHX 84.0–87.9 Overlap 2.78 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.3–88.4 PHX 84.2–87.3 Overlap 2.05 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.4–88.1 PHX 84.4–87.1 Overlap 1.77 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.5–88.1 PHX 84.5–87.0 Overlap 1.45 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.7) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
8.94
p-value
1.72e-17

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
LVA 84.6–89.3 PHX 83.3–88.3 Overlap 3.69 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 84.9–88.6 PHX 83.6–87.6 Overlap 2.72 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.1–88.3 PHX 83.7–87.3 Overlap 2.24 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.3–88.0 PHX 84.2–87.1 Overlap 1.83 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.6–87.9 PHX 84.4–86.9 Overlap 1.28 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 86.8) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 85.6) — by 1.2 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
9.65
p-value
7.34e-20

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
LVA 84.9–89.8 PHX 84.4–89.3 Overlap 4.41 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 86.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.2–89.0 PHX 84.5–88.9 Overlap 3.67 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 86.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.5–88.9 PHX 84.8–88.6 Overlap 3.08 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 86.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 85.8–88.7 PHX 84.9–88.4 Overlap 2.59 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 86.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.9–88.4 PHX 85.1–88.3 Overlap 2.36 pts Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.1) over Phoenix Mercury (avg. 86.6) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
3.84
p-value
1.46e-04

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — LVA at PHX — Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82
Level LVA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.4–89.4 83.7–88.1 3.78 pts — No
90% 84.8–89.0 84.0–87.7 2.93 pts — No
85% 85.0–88.7 84.2–87.4 2.33 pts — No
80% 85.2–88.5 84.4–87.1 1.85 pts — No
75% 85.4–88.4 84.5–87.0 1.55 pts — No
Reg — LVA at PHX — Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82
Level LVA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–89.8 83.7–88.6 3.97 pts — No
90% 85.0–89.4 84.2–88.1 3.07 pts — No
85% 85.3–89.1 84.3–87.7 2.35 pts — No
80% 85.5–88.9 84.5–87.5 1.96 pts — No
75% 85.7–88.7 84.7–87.4 1.68 pts — No
Dr. Wallace — LVA at PHX — Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82
Level LVA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–89.5 83.4–88.2 3.56 pts — No
90% 85.0–88.6 83.8–87.5 2.45 pts — No
85% 85.2–88.5 84.0–87.1 1.96 pts — No
80% 85.2–88.1 84.1–87.0 1.82 pts — No
75% 85.4–87.9 84.2–86.8 1.36 pts — No
Kevin — LVA at PHX — Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82
Level LVA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.4–89.1 83.9–88.2 3.75 pts — No
90% 84.8–88.7 84.1–87.4 2.62 pts — No
85% 85.1–88.5 84.3–87.1 2.03 pts — No
80% 85.3–88.3 84.3–86.9 1.69 pts — No
75% 85.4–88.1 84.5–86.8 1.34 pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — LVA at PHX — Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82
Level LVA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.5–89.7 82.8–88.4 3.85 pts — No
90% 85.0–88.9 83.3–87.9 2.9 pts — No
85% 85.2–88.7 83.6–87.6 2.42 pts — No
80% 85.3–88.5 83.8–87.4 2.07 pts — No
75% 85.6–88.2 84.0–87.2 1.66 pts — No
Ice — LVA at PHX — Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82
Level LVA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.5–89.0 83.8–88.0 3.53 pts — No
90% 85.1–88.1 84.0–87.4 2.38 pts — No
85% 85.2–88.0 84.2–87.3 2.11 pts — No
80% 85.3–87.9 84.3–87.1 1.8 pts — No
75% 85.5–87.8 84.4–86.9 1.45 pts — No
Jamal — LVA at PHX — Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82
Level LVA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.5–89.0 83.6–88.3 3.79 pts — No
90% 84.9–88.6 83.9–87.9 3.06 pts — No
85% 85.1–88.4 84.2–87.4 2.28 pts — No
80% 85.3–88.2 84.4–87.2 1.94 pts — No
75% 85.4–88.1 84.5–87.0 1.59 pts — No
Jordan — LVA at PHX — Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82
Level LVA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–89.5 83.3–88.3 3.7 pts — No
90% 85.1–88.8 83.7–87.9 2.77 pts — No
85% 85.3–88.4 84.0–87.5 2.24 pts — No
80% 85.5–88.2 84.2–87.5 1.98 pts — No
75% 85.7–88.1 84.3–87.2 1.57 pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — LVA at PHX — Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82
Level LVA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–89.1 83.9–88.9 4.35 pts — No
90% 85.0–88.8 84.3–88.1 3.18 pts — No
85% 85.2–88.5 84.4–87.5 2.31 pts — No
80% 85.4–88.3 84.6–87.3 1.9 pts — No
75% 85.5–88.2 84.6–87.1 1.61 pts — No
Maya Jefferson — LVA at PHX — Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82
Level LVA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–89.7 83.7–88.5 3.87 pts — No
90% 85.1–88.7 84.0–87.9 2.78 pts — No
85% 85.3–88.4 84.2–87.3 2.05 pts — No
80% 85.4–88.1 84.4–87.1 1.77 pts — No
75% 85.5–88.1 84.5–87.0 1.45 pts — No
Lexi — LVA at PHX — Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82
Level LVA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.6–89.3 83.3–88.3 3.69 pts — No
90% 84.9–88.6 83.6–87.6 2.72 pts — No
85% 85.1–88.3 83.7–87.3 2.24 pts — No
80% 85.3–88.0 84.2–87.1 1.83 pts — No
75% 85.6–87.9 84.4–86.9 1.28 pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — LVA at PHX — Actual: LVA 100, PHX 82
Level LVA range PHX range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 84.9–89.8 84.4–89.3 4.41 pts — No
90% 85.2–89.0 84.5–88.9 3.67 pts — No
85% 85.5–88.9 84.8–88.6 3.08 pts — No
80% 85.8–88.7 84.9–88.4 2.59 pts — No
75% 85.9–88.4 85.1–88.3 2.36 pts — No