Clay's Almanac
WNBA · September 29, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
NFL
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Las Vegas Aces at Indiana Fever

LVA 89 – IND 99

September 29, 2026 · Final

Dr. Lila Shah

Best model for this game

Dr. Lila Shah
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for LVA at IND

All 12 models’ predicted scores

LVA — one dot per model IND — one dot per model Actual: LVA 89, IND 99
Vince Chambers
LVA 86.5–91.2 IND 88.2–94.5 Overlap 2.92 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.6–90.5 IND 88.7–94.0 Overlap 1.78 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.7–90.2 IND 89.1–93.7 Overlap 1.15 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.9–90.0 IND 89.3–93.5 Overlap 0.64 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 87.0–89.8 IND 89.5–93.2 Overlap 0.28 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
-21.29
p-value
1.41e-66

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
LVA 86.3–91.2 IND 88.4–94.9 Overlap 2.73 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.7) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.7–90.8 IND 89.0–94.4 Overlap 1.82 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.7) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.9–90.5 IND 89.3–94.0 Overlap 1.23 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.7) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 87.1–90.3 IND 89.6–93.8 Overlap 0.77 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.7) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 87.3–90.2 IND 89.8–93.6 Overlap 0.39 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.7) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
-21.69
p-value
2.42e-67

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
LVA 86.7–90.8 IND 88.9–94.6 Overlap 1.83 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.8–90.3 IND 89.3–94.0 Overlap 1.07 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.9–90.0 IND 89.4–93.8 Overlap 0.58 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 87.0–89.8 IND 89.5–93.6 Overlap 0.27 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 87.1–89.7 IND 89.8–93.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
-22.62
p-value
7.06e-71

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
LVA 86.4–90.9 IND 89.0–94.5 Overlap 1.87 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.8–90.4 IND 89.3–94.1 Overlap 1.07 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.9–90.1 IND 89.6–93.6 Overlap 0.54 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 87.1–89.8 IND 89.7–93.3 Overlap 0.07 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 87.2–89.5 IND 89.9–93.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
-22.87
p-value
9.39e-73

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
LVA 85.1–89.4 IND 88.3–94.5 Overlap 1.06 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) — by 3.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 85.4–88.9 IND 88.7–93.9 Overlap 0.2 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) — by 3.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 85.7–88.8 IND 88.9–93.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) — by 3.8 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 85.9–88.6 IND 89.3–93.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) — by 3.8 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.0–88.5 IND 89.4–92.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 87.2) — by 3.8 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
-26.16
p-value
8.89e-85

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
LVA 86.1–90.4 IND 87.9–93.9 Overlap 2.44 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.9) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.5–89.9 IND 88.4–93.4 Overlap 1.45 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.9) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.8–89.7 IND 88.7–93.1 Overlap 1.01 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.9) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.9–89.5 IND 89.0–92.8 Overlap 0.58 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.9) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 87.0–89.2 IND 89.1–92.6 Overlap 0.06 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.9) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.2) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
-21.34
p-value
3.49e-66

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
LVA 86.4–91.1 IND 88.2–94.1 Overlap 2.93 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.7–90.5 IND 88.7–93.6 Overlap 1.85 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.9–90.1 IND 89.0–93.3 Overlap 1.11 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) — by 2.8 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 87.0–89.8 IND 89.2–93.1 Overlap 0.59 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 87.2–89.6 IND 89.4–92.9 Overlap 0.18 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) — by 2.8 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
-21.82
p-value
1.31e-68

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
LVA 86.6–90.7 IND 88.8–94.4 Overlap 1.94 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.6) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.8–90.3 IND 89.2–94.0 Overlap 1.06 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.6) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 87.1–90.1 IND 89.5–93.7 Overlap 0.59 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.6) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 87.2–89.8 IND 89.7–93.4 Overlap 0.13 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.6) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 87.3–89.6 IND 89.9–93.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.6) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.4) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
-25.29
p-value
7.28e-83

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
LVA 86.3–90.4 IND 88.8–94.5 Overlap 1.64 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.4–89.7 IND 88.8–93.5 Overlap 0.91 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.6–89.6 IND 89.2–93.2 Overlap 0.39 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 86.7–89.3 IND 89.4–92.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by 3.0 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 86.9–89.2 IND 89.7–92.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by 3.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
-22.56
p-value
5.83e-72

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
LVA 86.4–91.4 IND 88.1–95.0 Overlap 3.24 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 86.7–90.6 IND 88.7–94.5 Overlap 1.91 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.8–90.3 IND 89.0–94.1 Overlap 1.28 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.9–90.1 IND 89.3–93.8 Overlap 0.78 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 87.1–90.0 IND 89.5–93.6 Overlap 0.49 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.5) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
-20.39
p-value
1.78e-62

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
LVA 86.8–90.5 IND 88.1–94.3 Overlap 2.41 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 86.9–90.2 IND 88.6–93.8 Overlap 1.61 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 87.0–90.1 IND 88.9–93.5 Overlap 1.15 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) — by 2.9 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 87.1–89.9 IND 89.2–93.2 Overlap 0.68 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

LVA 87.2–89.6 IND 89.4–93.0 Overlap 0.18 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 91.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.3) — by 2.9 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
-22.50
p-value
1.30e-70

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
LVA 86.9–92.0 IND 88.0–93.7 Overlap 4.04 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.8) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.5) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 87.3–91.6 IND 88.4–93.2 Overlap 3.17 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.8) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.5) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

LVA 87.6–91.3 IND 88.7–92.9 Overlap 2.6 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.8) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.5) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 87.8–91.1 IND 89.0–92.7 Overlap 2.17 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.8) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.5) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

LVA 88.0–91.0 IND 89.2–92.5 Overlap 1.8 pts Actual: LVA 89, IND 99

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.8) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.5) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
-10.71
p-value
1.34e-23

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — LVA at IND — Actual: LVA 89, IND 99
Level LVA range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.5–91.2 88.2–94.5 2.92 pts — No
90% 86.6–90.5 88.7–94.0 1.78 pts — No
85% 86.7–90.2 89.1–93.7 1.15 pts — No
80% 86.9–90.0 89.3–93.5 0.64 pts — No
75% 87.0–89.8 89.5–93.2 0.28 pts — No
Reg — LVA at IND — Actual: LVA 89, IND 99
Level LVA range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.3–91.2 88.4–94.9 2.73 pts — No
90% 86.7–90.8 89.0–94.4 1.82 pts — No
85% 86.9–90.5 89.3–94.0 1.23 pts — No
80% 87.1–90.3 89.6–93.8 0.77 pts — No
75% 87.3–90.2 89.8–93.6 0.39 pts — No
Dr. Wallace — LVA at IND — Actual: LVA 89, IND 99
Level LVA range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.7–90.8 88.9–94.6 1.83 pts — No
90% 86.8–90.3 89.3–94.0 1.07 pts — No
85% 86.9–90.0 89.4–93.8 0.58 pts — No
80% 87.0–89.8 89.5–93.6 0.27 pts — No
75% 87.1–89.7 89.8–93.3 — pts — No
Kevin — LVA at IND — Actual: LVA 89, IND 99
Level LVA range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.4–90.9 89.0–94.5 1.87 pts — No
90% 86.8–90.4 89.3–94.1 1.07 pts — No
85% 86.9–90.1 89.6–93.6 0.54 pts — No
80% 87.1–89.8 89.7–93.3 0.07 pts — No
75% 87.2–89.5 89.9–93.0 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — LVA at IND — Actual: LVA 89, IND 99
Level LVA range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 85.1–89.4 88.3–94.5 1.06 pts — No
90% 85.4–88.9 88.7–93.9 0.2 pts — No
85% 85.7–88.8 88.9–93.3 — pts — No
80% 85.9–88.6 89.3–93.1 — pts — No
75% 86.0–88.5 89.4–92.8 — pts — No
Ice — LVA at IND — Actual: LVA 89, IND 99
Level LVA range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.1–90.4 87.9–93.9 2.44 pts — No
90% 86.5–89.9 88.4–93.4 1.45 pts — No
85% 86.8–89.7 88.7–93.1 1.01 pts — No
80% 86.9–89.5 89.0–92.8 0.58 pts — No
75% 87.0–89.2 89.1–92.6 0.06 pts — No
Jamal — LVA at IND — Actual: LVA 89, IND 99
Level LVA range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.4–91.1 88.2–94.1 2.93 pts — No
90% 86.7–90.5 88.7–93.6 1.85 pts — No
85% 86.9–90.1 89.0–93.3 1.11 pts — No
80% 87.0–89.8 89.2–93.1 0.59 pts — No
75% 87.2–89.6 89.4–92.9 0.18 pts — No
Jordan — LVA at IND — Actual: LVA 89, IND 99
Level LVA range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.6–90.7 88.8–94.4 1.94 pts — No
90% 86.8–90.3 89.2–94.0 1.06 pts — No
85% 87.1–90.1 89.5–93.7 0.59 pts — No
80% 87.2–89.8 89.7–93.4 0.13 pts — No
75% 87.3–89.6 89.9–93.2 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — LVA at IND — Actual: LVA 89, IND 99
Level LVA range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.3–90.4 88.8–94.5 1.64 pts — No
90% 86.4–89.7 88.8–93.5 0.91 pts — No
85% 86.6–89.6 89.2–93.2 0.39 pts — No
80% 86.7–89.3 89.4–92.7 — pts — No
75% 86.9–89.2 89.7–92.5 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — LVA at IND — Actual: LVA 89, IND 99
Level LVA range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.4–91.4 88.1–95.0 3.24 pts — No
90% 86.7–90.6 88.7–94.5 1.91 pts — No
85% 86.8–90.3 89.0–94.1 1.28 pts — No
80% 86.9–90.1 89.3–93.8 0.78 pts — No
75% 87.1–90.0 89.5–93.6 0.49 pts — No
Lexi — LVA at IND — Actual: LVA 89, IND 99
Level LVA range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.8–90.5 88.1–94.3 2.41 pts — No
90% 86.9–90.2 88.6–93.8 1.61 pts — No
85% 87.0–90.1 88.9–93.5 1.15 pts — No
80% 87.1–89.9 89.2–93.2 0.68 pts — No
75% 87.2–89.6 89.4–93.0 0.18 pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — LVA at IND — Actual: LVA 89, IND 99
Level LVA range IND range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.9–92.0 88.0–93.7 4.04 pts — No
90% 87.3–91.6 88.4–93.2 3.17 pts — No
85% 87.6–91.3 88.7–92.9 2.6 pts — No
80% 87.8–91.1 89.0–92.7 2.17 pts — No
75% 88.0–91.0 89.2–92.5 1.8 pts — No