Clay's Almanac
WNBA · October 1, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
NFL
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Indiana Fever at Las Vegas Aces

IND 83 – LVA 94

October 1, 2026 · Final

Coach Sarah Watanabe

Best model for this game

Coach Sarah Watanabe
All models: 0-12
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for IND at LVA

All 12 models’ predicted scores

IND — one dot per model LVA — one dot per model Actual: IND 83, LVA 94
Vince Chambers
IND 88.0–92.9 LVA 86.9–91.1 Overlap 3.14 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.0) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 88.4–92.5 LVA 87.2–90.8 Overlap 2.4 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.0) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.6–92.3 LVA 87.4–90.6 Overlap 1.92 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.0) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.8–92.1 LVA 87.6–90.4 Overlap 1.55 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.0) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 89.0–91.9 LVA 87.7–90.2 Overlap 1.24 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.5) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.0) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
13.40
p-value
8.32e-34

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
IND 87.9–93.6 LVA 86.9–91.7 Overlap 3.8 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 88.1–93.1 LVA 87.3–91.3 Overlap 3.16 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 88.8–92.5 LVA 87.6–91.1 Overlap 2.29 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 89.2–92.3 LVA 87.8–90.9 Overlap 1.71 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 89.3–92.2 LVA 87.9–90.7 Overlap 1.38 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.3) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
11.07
p-value
8.06e-25

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
IND 87.7–92.8 LVA 87.1–91.2 Overlap 3.51 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 88.1–92.4 LVA 87.2–90.6 Overlap 2.56 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.3–92.1 LVA 87.5–90.2 Overlap 1.87 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.5–91.9 LVA 87.7–90.1 Overlap 1.58 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.7–91.7 LVA 87.8–90.0 Overlap 1.31 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
11.22
p-value
1.84e-25

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
IND 88.0–93.1 LVA 87.2–91.3 Overlap 3.27 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.6) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.2) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 88.4–92.7 LVA 87.5–91.0 Overlap 2.53 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.6) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.2) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.7–92.4 LVA 87.7–90.7 Overlap 2.05 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.6) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.2) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.9–92.2 LVA 87.9–90.6 Overlap 1.68 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.6) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.2) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 89.1–92.0 LVA 88.0–90.4 Overlap 1.37 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.6) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.2) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
12.18
p-value
5.74e-29

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
IND 87.3–94.2 LVA 86.0–90.9 Overlap 3.61 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 87.9–93.7 LVA 86.4–89.9 Overlap 2.07 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.2–93.3 LVA 86.6–89.7 Overlap 1.52 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.5–93.0 LVA 86.7–89.5 Overlap 1.04 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by 2.7 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.7–92.8 LVA 86.8–89.3 Overlap 0.6 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.7) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.1) — by 2.7 points. The ranges barely touch.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
18.39
p-value
7.43e-54

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
IND 87.4–92.8 LVA 86.9–91.5 Overlap 4.14 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 87.8–92.4 LVA 87.3–91.0 Overlap 3.16 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 88.1–92.1 LVA 87.4–90.6 Overlap 2.56 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.3–91.9 LVA 87.5–90.3 Overlap 1.97 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.5–91.7 LVA 87.5–90.1 Overlap 1.64 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.1) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.8) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
10.22
p-value
7.77e-22

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
IND 87.8–92.6 LVA 87.1–90.9 Overlap 3.13 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 88.1–92.1 LVA 87.3–90.6 Overlap 2.49 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.5–91.9 LVA 87.5–90.4 Overlap 1.89 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.5–91.5 LVA 87.7–90.1 Overlap 1.58 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.6–91.4 LVA 87.8–89.9 Overlap 1.31 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
9.43
p-value
3.99e-19

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
IND 88.3–92.7 LVA 86.9–91.0 Overlap 2.77 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.3) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.6–92.4 LVA 87.2–90.5 Overlap 1.97 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.3) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.8–92.0 LVA 87.6–90.4 Overlap 1.57 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.3) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.9–91.7 LVA 87.8–90.2 Overlap 1.25 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.3) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 89.0–91.6 LVA 87.9–90.1 Overlap 1.02 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.3) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
11.80
p-value
1.27e-27

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
IND 87.3–93.4 LVA 86.5–91.3 Overlap 4.01 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 87.8–93.0 LVA 86.9–90.9 Overlap 3.13 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 88.1–92.6 LVA 87.2–90.7 Overlap 2.56 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.4–92.4 LVA 87.4–90.5 Overlap 2.12 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.6–92.2 LVA 87.5–90.3 Overlap 1.75 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
11.19
p-value
3.19e-25

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
IND 87.7–93.1 LVA 87.5–91.2 Overlap 3.54 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 88.1–92.7 LVA 87.6–90.6 Overlap 2.5 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.4–92.4 LVA 87.7–90.2 Overlap 1.81 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.6–92.2 LVA 87.8–90.0 Overlap 1.41 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.8–92.0 LVA 87.9–89.9 Overlap 1.13 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.4) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
12.82
p-value
2.97e-31

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
IND 88.1–92.4 LVA 87.2–90.9 Overlap 2.84 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.3–92.1 LVA 87.3–90.7 Overlap 2.38 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.7–92.1 LVA 87.5–90.6 Overlap 1.85 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.9–91.8 LVA 87.7–90.2 Overlap 1.33 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 89.0–91.6 LVA 87.8–90.1 Overlap 1.12 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.2) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) — by 1.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
11.85
p-value
7.85e-28

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
IND 87.4–92.5 LVA 87.1–91.8 Overlap 4.41 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 87.8–92.1 LVA 87.5–91.4 Overlap 3.62 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 88.1–91.8 LVA 87.7–91.2 Overlap 3.1 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap almost entirely, so one game could go either way.

IND 88.3–91.6 LVA 87.9–91.0 Overlap 2.71 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

IND 88.4–91.5 LVA 88.1–90.8 Overlap 2.38 pts Actual: IND 83, LVA 94

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Indiana Fever (avg. 90.0) over Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.4) — by under a point. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
4.43
p-value
1.24e-05

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 83, LVA 94
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.0–92.9 86.9–91.1 3.14 pts — No
90% 88.4–92.5 87.2–90.8 2.4 pts — No
85% 88.6–92.3 87.4–90.6 1.92 pts — No
80% 88.8–92.1 87.6–90.4 1.55 pts — No
75% 89.0–91.9 87.7–90.2 1.24 pts — No
Reg — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 83, LVA 94
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.9–93.6 86.9–91.7 3.8 pts — No
90% 88.1–93.1 87.3–91.3 3.16 pts — No
85% 88.8–92.5 87.6–91.1 2.29 pts — No
80% 89.2–92.3 87.8–90.9 1.71 pts — No
75% 89.3–92.2 87.9–90.7 1.38 pts — No
Dr. Wallace — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 83, LVA 94
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.7–92.8 87.1–91.2 3.51 pts — No
90% 88.1–92.4 87.2–90.6 2.56 pts — No
85% 88.3–92.1 87.5–90.2 1.87 pts — No
80% 88.5–91.9 87.7–90.1 1.58 pts — No
75% 88.7–91.7 87.8–90.0 1.31 pts — No
Kevin — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 83, LVA 94
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.0–93.1 87.2–91.3 3.27 pts — No
90% 88.4–92.7 87.5–91.0 2.53 pts — No
85% 88.7–92.4 87.7–90.7 2.05 pts — No
80% 88.9–92.2 87.9–90.6 1.68 pts — No
75% 89.1–92.0 88.0–90.4 1.37 pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 83, LVA 94
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.3–94.2 86.0–90.9 3.61 pts — No
90% 87.9–93.7 86.4–89.9 2.07 pts — No
85% 88.2–93.3 86.6–89.7 1.52 pts — No
80% 88.5–93.0 86.7–89.5 1.04 pts — No
75% 88.7–92.8 86.8–89.3 0.6 pts — No
Ice — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 83, LVA 94
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.4–92.8 86.9–91.5 4.14 pts — No
90% 87.8–92.4 87.3–91.0 3.16 pts — No
85% 88.1–92.1 87.4–90.6 2.56 pts — No
80% 88.3–91.9 87.5–90.3 1.97 pts — No
75% 88.5–91.7 87.5–90.1 1.64 pts — No
Jamal — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 83, LVA 94
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.8–92.6 87.1–90.9 3.13 pts — No
90% 88.1–92.1 87.3–90.6 2.49 pts — No
85% 88.5–91.9 87.5–90.4 1.89 pts — No
80% 88.5–91.5 87.7–90.1 1.58 pts — No
75% 88.6–91.4 87.8–89.9 1.31 pts — No
Jordan — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 83, LVA 94
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.3–92.7 86.9–91.0 2.77 pts — No
90% 88.6–92.4 87.2–90.5 1.97 pts — No
85% 88.8–92.0 87.6–90.4 1.57 pts — No
80% 88.9–91.7 87.8–90.2 1.25 pts — No
75% 89.0–91.6 87.9–90.1 1.02 pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 83, LVA 94
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.3–93.4 86.5–91.3 4.01 pts — No
90% 87.8–93.0 86.9–90.9 3.13 pts — No
85% 88.1–92.6 87.2–90.7 2.56 pts — No
80% 88.4–92.4 87.4–90.5 2.12 pts — No
75% 88.6–92.2 87.5–90.3 1.75 pts — No
Maya Jefferson — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 83, LVA 94
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.7–93.1 87.5–91.2 3.54 pts — No
90% 88.1–92.7 87.6–90.6 2.5 pts — No
85% 88.4–92.4 87.7–90.2 1.81 pts — No
80% 88.6–92.2 87.8–90.0 1.41 pts — No
75% 88.8–92.0 87.9–89.9 1.13 pts — No
Lexi — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 83, LVA 94
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.1–92.4 87.2–90.9 2.84 pts — No
90% 88.3–92.1 87.3–90.7 2.38 pts — No
85% 88.7–92.1 87.5–90.6 1.85 pts — No
80% 88.9–91.8 87.7–90.2 1.33 pts — No
75% 89.0–91.6 87.8–90.1 1.12 pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — IND at LVA — Actual: IND 83, LVA 94
Level IND range LVA range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.4–92.5 87.1–91.8 4.41 pts — No
90% 87.8–92.1 87.5–91.4 3.62 pts — No
85% 88.1–91.8 87.7–91.2 3.1 pts — No
80% 88.3–91.6 87.9–91.0 2.71 pts — No
75% 88.4–91.5 88.1–90.8 2.38 pts — No