Clay's Almanac
WNBA · October 7, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
NFL
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Las Vegas Aces at Golden State Valkyries

LVA 81 – GS 83

October 7, 2026 · Final

Dr. Lila Shah

Best model for this game

Dr. Lila Shah
All models: 0-12
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for LVA at GS

All 12 models’ predicted scores

LVA — one dot per model GS — one dot per model Actual: LVA 81, GS 83
Vince Chambers
LVA 88.0–92.2 GS 79.1–84.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 8.2 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.4–91.9 GS 79.6–84.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 8.2 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.5–91.6 GS 79.8–83.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 8.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.7–91.3 GS 80.1–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 8.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.8–91.1 GS 80.2–83.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 8.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
67.19
p-value
1.47e-209

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
LVA 87.8–92.9 GS 79.0–84.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 8.5 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.2–92.5 GS 79.5–84.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 8.5 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.5–92.2 GS 79.8–83.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 8.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.7–92.0 GS 80.0–83.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 8.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.8–91.9 GS 80.2–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.8) — by 8.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
66.05
p-value
2.78e-207

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
LVA 87.6–92.6 GS 79.4–84.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.4 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.0–92.2 GS 79.7–83.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.2–91.9 GS 80.0–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.4–91.7 GS 80.2–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.6–91.5 GS 80.4–82.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
69.16
p-value
4.70e-215

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
LVA 87.6–92.6 GS 79.1–83.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 8.6 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.0–92.2 GS 79.5–83.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 8.6 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.3–92.0 GS 79.8–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 8.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.5–91.8 GS 80.0–83.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 8.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.7–91.6 GS 80.1–82.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 8.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
73.43
p-value
4.30e-224

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
LVA 86.5–91.9 GS 79.1–84.5 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 7.4 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.1–91.5 GS 79.4–83.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 7.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.2–91.0 GS 79.7–83.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 7.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.4–90.4 GS 80.0–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 7.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 87.6–90.2 GS 80.1–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 88.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 7.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
54.12
p-value
9.63e-179

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
LVA 87.9–92.2 GS 79.3–83.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.8) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.2 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.2–91.7 GS 79.6–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.8) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.2 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.3–91.4 GS 80.1–83.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.8) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.5–91.2 GS 80.3–82.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.8) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.6–91.0 GS 80.6–82.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.8) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
71.76
p-value
1.61e-220

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
LVA 87.7–92.0 GS 78.9–83.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 8.3 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.1–91.7 GS 79.4–83.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 8.3 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.3–91.4 GS 79.6–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 8.3 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.5–91.3 GS 79.8–82.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 8.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.6–91.1 GS 80.0–82.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.5) — by 8.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
71.04
p-value
1.16e-211

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
LVA 88.3–92.4 GS 79.3–84.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.4 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.6–92.1 GS 79.6–83.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.4 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.8–91.6 GS 79.9–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.8–91.3 GS 80.1–83.1 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.9–91.2 GS 80.2–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
75.89
p-value
3.40e-229

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
LVA 88.2–92.6 GS 79.0–84.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 8.3 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.4–92.3 GS 79.5–83.9 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 8.3 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.6–91.9 GS 79.7–83.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 8.3 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.6–91.3 GS 79.9–83.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 8.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.7–91.2 GS 80.1–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.0) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 8.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
66.01
p-value
5.45e-208

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
LVA 88.3–92.4 GS 79.0–84.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.5 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.5–91.9 GS 79.7–83.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.5 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.6–91.7 GS 79.9–83.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.7–91.6 GS 80.2–83.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.9–91.3 GS 80.3–83.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.1) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.6) — by 8.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
65.36
p-value
2.05e-202

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
LVA 87.6–92.3 GS 79.1–84.3 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 8.2 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.1–91.9 GS 79.5–83.8 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 8.2 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.3–91.6 GS 79.8–83.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 8.2 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.6–91.4 GS 80.0–83.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 8.2 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.8–91.1 GS 80.2–83.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 89.9) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 81.7) — by 8.2 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
68.69
p-value
1.50e-213

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
LVA 87.7–92.9 GS 80.7–85.7 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.8) — by 7.6 points. The 95% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.1–92.5 GS 81.1–85.4 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.8) — by 7.6 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.4–92.2 GS 81.2–84.6 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.8) — by 7.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.6–92.0 GS 81.4–84.2 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.8) — by 7.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

LVA 88.8–91.8 GS 81.5–84.0 No overlap Actual: LVA 81, GS 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Las Vegas Aces (avg. 90.3) over Golden State Valkyries (avg. 82.8) — by 7.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
58.47
p-value
5.93e-190

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — LVA at GS — Actual: LVA 81, GS 83
Level LVA range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.0–92.2 79.1–84.5 — pts — No
90% 88.4–91.9 79.6–84.0 — pts — No
85% 88.5–91.6 79.8–83.7 — pts — No
80% 88.7–91.3 80.1–83.5 — pts — No
75% 88.8–91.1 80.2–83.4 — pts — No
Reg — LVA at GS — Actual: LVA 81, GS 83
Level LVA range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.8–92.9 79.0–84.6 — pts — No
90% 88.2–92.5 79.5–84.2 — pts — No
85% 88.5–92.2 79.8–83.9 — pts — No
80% 88.7–92.0 80.0–83.7 — pts — No
75% 88.8–91.9 80.2–83.5 — pts — No
Dr. Wallace — LVA at GS — Actual: LVA 81, GS 83
Level LVA range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.6–92.6 79.4–84.0 — pts — No
90% 88.0–92.2 79.7–83.6 — pts — No
85% 88.2–91.9 80.0–83.3 — pts — No
80% 88.4–91.7 80.2–83.0 — pts — No
75% 88.6–91.5 80.4–82.8 — pts — No
Kevin — LVA at GS — Actual: LVA 81, GS 83
Level LVA range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.6–92.6 79.1–83.9 — pts — No
90% 88.0–92.2 79.5–83.5 — pts — No
85% 88.3–92.0 79.8–83.3 — pts — No
80% 88.5–91.8 80.0–83.1 — pts — No
75% 88.7–91.6 80.1–82.9 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — LVA at GS — Actual: LVA 81, GS 83
Level LVA range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 86.5–91.9 79.1–84.5 — pts — No
90% 87.1–91.5 79.4–83.8 — pts — No
85% 87.2–91.0 79.7–83.6 — pts — No
80% 87.4–90.4 80.0–83.3 — pts — No
75% 87.6–90.2 80.1–83.0 — pts — No
Ice — LVA at GS — Actual: LVA 81, GS 83
Level LVA range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.9–92.2 79.3–83.6 — pts — No
90% 88.2–91.7 79.6–83.3 — pts — No
85% 88.3–91.4 80.1–83.1 — pts — No
80% 88.5–91.2 80.3–82.9 — pts — No
75% 88.6–91.0 80.6–82.7 — pts — No
Jamal — LVA at GS — Actual: LVA 81, GS 83
Level LVA range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.7–92.0 78.9–83.8 — pts — No
90% 88.1–91.7 79.4–83.4 — pts — No
85% 88.3–91.4 79.6–83.3 — pts — No
80% 88.5–91.3 79.8–82.9 — pts — No
75% 88.6–91.1 80.0–82.8 — pts — No
Jordan — LVA at GS — Actual: LVA 81, GS 83
Level LVA range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.3–92.4 79.3–84.0 — pts — No
90% 88.6–92.1 79.6–83.6 — pts — No
85% 88.8–91.6 79.9–83.3 — pts — No
80% 88.8–91.3 80.1–83.1 — pts — No
75% 88.9–91.2 80.2–83.0 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — LVA at GS — Actual: LVA 81, GS 83
Level LVA range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.2–92.6 79.0–84.4 — pts — No
90% 88.4–92.3 79.5–83.9 — pts — No
85% 88.6–91.9 79.7–83.7 — pts — No
80% 88.6–91.3 79.9–83.4 — pts — No
75% 88.7–91.2 80.1–83.3 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — LVA at GS — Actual: LVA 81, GS 83
Level LVA range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.3–92.4 79.0–84.7 — pts — No
90% 88.5–91.9 79.7–83.8 — pts — No
85% 88.6–91.7 79.9–83.3 — pts — No
80% 88.7–91.6 80.2–83.2 — pts — No
75% 88.9–91.3 80.3–83.0 — pts — No
Lexi — LVA at GS — Actual: LVA 81, GS 83
Level LVA range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.6–92.3 79.1–84.3 — pts — No
90% 88.1–91.9 79.5–83.8 — pts — No
85% 88.3–91.6 79.8–83.6 — pts — No
80% 88.6–91.4 80.0–83.4 — pts — No
75% 88.8–91.1 80.2–83.2 — pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — LVA at GS — Actual: LVA 81, GS 83
Level LVA range GS range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.7–92.9 80.7–85.7 — pts — No
90% 88.1–92.5 81.1–85.4 — pts — No
85% 88.4–92.2 81.2–84.6 — pts — No
80% 88.6–92.0 81.4–84.2 — pts — No
75% 88.8–91.8 81.5–84.0 — pts — No