Clay's Almanac
WNBA · October 9, 2026
Almanac — change team skin

Repaints the site's chrome in a team's colours. Predictions, grades and the colours on each game card are unchanged.

Almanac
NBA
WNBA
NFL
Log in Join

← Back to WNBA

Atlanta Dream at New York Liberty

ATL 85 – NY 83

October 9, 2026 · Final

Coach Sarah Watanabe

Best model for this game

Coach Sarah Watanabe
All models: 12-0
Prediction ranges

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, each team scored inside its band below — this is about where the final score lands, not a claim about the average.

Confidence level for ATL at NY

All 12 models’ predicted scores

ATL — one dot per model NY — one dot per model Actual: ATL 85, NY 83
Vince Chambers
ATL 88.2–93.1 NY 85.0–89.5 Overlap 1.23 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.2) — by 3.5 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 88.6–92.7 NY 85.3–89.1 Overlap 0.48 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.2) — by 3.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.9–92.5 NY 85.6–88.9 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.2) — by 3.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 89.1–92.3 NY 85.7–88.7 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.2) — by 3.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 89.2–92.1 NY 85.9–88.5 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.2) — by 3.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Vince Chambers (#1)
t-statistic
31.32
p-value
4.09e-108

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Reg
ATL 88.1–93.6 NY 85.3–89.6 Overlap 1.53 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.3) — by 3.4 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 88.6–93.2 NY 85.6–89.4 Overlap 0.74 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.3) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.9–93.0 NY 85.7–89.1 Overlap 0.21 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.3) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 89.0–92.7 NY 85.8–88.9 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.3) — by 3.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 89.2–92.2 NY 86.0–88.6 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.3) — by 3.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Reg (#2)
t-statistic
24.64
p-value
1.94e-79

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Wallace
ATL 88.3–92.6 NY 84.7–89.3 Overlap 0.99 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.6–92.2 NY 85.1–88.9 Overlap 0.28 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.4 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.9–92.0 NY 85.3–88.7 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.4 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 89.0–91.8 NY 85.5–88.5 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.4 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 89.2–91.7 NY 85.7–88.3 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.4 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Wallace (#3)
t-statistic
32.93
p-value
1.55e-114

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Kevin
ATL 88.3–93.1 NY 85.4–89.2 Overlap 0.88 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.7–92.7 NY 85.6–88.9 Overlap 0.24 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 89.0–92.5 NY 85.8–88.6 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 89.1–92.3 NY 85.8–88.4 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 89.3–92.1 NY 86.0–88.3 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Kevin (#4)
t-statistic
32.44
p-value
1.01e-112

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Dr. Lila Shah
ATL 88.1–93.4 NY 84.6–89.4 Overlap 1.31 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 86.6) — by 4.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 88.5–93.0 NY 84.9–88.2 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 86.6) — by 4.1 points. The 90% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 88.8–92.7 NY 85.2–88.0 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 86.6) — by 4.1 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 89.0–92.5 NY 85.5–87.8 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 86.6) — by 4.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 89.2–92.3 NY 85.5–87.7 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.7) over New York Liberty (avg. 86.6) — by 4.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Dr. Lila Shah (#5)
t-statistic
34.34
p-value
1.65e-119

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Ice
ATL 87.7–92.7 NY 85.3–90.2 Overlap 2.56 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.2) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.1 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 88.1–92.3 NY 85.5–89.0 Overlap 0.95 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.2) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.3–92.0 NY 85.7–88.8 Overlap 0.46 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.2) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.1 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.5–91.8 NY 85.7–88.5 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.2) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.1 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 88.7–91.7 NY 85.9–88.4 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.2) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.1 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Ice (#6)
t-statistic
25.59
p-value
1.83e-85

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jamal
ATL 88.0–92.7 NY 85.3–89.6 Overlap 1.62 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.3) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 88.3–92.3 NY 85.5–88.8 Overlap 0.52 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.3) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.6–92.0 NY 85.6–88.6 Overlap 0.08 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.3) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.7–91.8 NY 85.7–88.4 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.3) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 88.9–91.7 NY 85.8–88.1 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.3) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jamal (#7)
t-statistic
30.73
p-value
5.79e-106

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Jordan
ATL 88.1–93.0 NY 85.1–89.6 Overlap 1.49 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.6) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.6 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 88.5–92.6 NY 85.5–88.8 Overlap 0.3 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.6) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.6 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.8–92.4 NY 85.6–88.6 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.6) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.6 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 89.0–92.2 NY 85.7–88.3 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.6) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.6 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 89.1–92.0 NY 85.8–88.2 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.6) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.6 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Jordan (#8)
t-statistic
31.53
p-value
2.74e-109

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Darren "Dimes" Lin
ATL 87.8–93.0 NY 84.6–89.6 Overlap 1.76 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 88.2–92.6 NY 85.0–89.2 Overlap 0.93 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.5–92.3 NY 85.2–88.9 Overlap 0.4 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.7–92.1 NY 85.4–88.7 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 88.9–91.9 NY 85.6–88.5 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Darren "Dimes" Lin (#9)
t-statistic
27.94
p-value
4.88e-95

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Maya Jefferson
ATL 87.8–93.0 NY 85.0–89.8 Overlap 2.06 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 88.2–92.5 NY 85.4–89.3 Overlap 1.1 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.3 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 88.5–92.3 NY 85.6–88.8 Overlap 0.35 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.3 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.7–92.1 NY 85.8–88.5 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.3 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 88.8–91.9 NY 86.0–88.3 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.4) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.1) — by 3.3 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Maya Jefferson (#10)
t-statistic
27.12
p-value
9.52e-92

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Lexi
ATL 88.4–93.0 NY 85.2–89.3 Overlap 0.95 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.5) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.7–92.4 NY 85.4–89.1 Overlap 0.41 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.5) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.5 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 89.0–92.0 NY 85.5–88.7 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.5) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.5 points. The 85% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 89.3–91.8 NY 85.8–88.3 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.5) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.5 points. The 80% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

ATL 89.4–91.6 NY 85.9–88.0 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 90.5) over New York Liberty (avg. 87.0) — by 3.5 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Lexi (#11)
t-statistic
31.43
p-value
5.94e-109

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

Coach Sarah Watanabe
ATL 87.6–92.3 NY 84.9–89.3 Overlap 1.71 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 95 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 89.9) over New York Liberty (avg. 86.9) — by 3.0 points. The ranges overlap some — there's real uncertainty here.

ATL 88.0–91.9 NY 85.2–88.8 Overlap 0.9 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 90 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 89.9) over New York Liberty (avg. 86.9) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.2–91.7 NY 85.5–88.6 Overlap 0.4 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 85 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 89.9) over New York Liberty (avg. 86.9) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.4–91.5 NY 85.6–88.4 Overlap 0.02 pts Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 80 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 89.9) over New York Liberty (avg. 86.9) — by 3.0 points. The ranges barely touch.

ATL 88.5–91.3 NY 85.8–88.3 No overlap Actual: ATL 85, NY 83

In 75 out of 100 simulated runs, leans Atlanta Dream (avg. 89.9) over New York Liberty (avg. 86.9) — by 3.0 points. The 75% ranges don't overlap at all — a confident model.

Show the math
Model
Coach Sarah Watanabe (#12)
t-statistic
26.55
p-value
2.35e-89

A low p-value means the two teams' average scores are statistically distinguishable — even when their ranges above overlap. Overlap describes where the final score could land; the test above is about whether the two averages differ. They are different claims, and either can hold without the other.

View as table
Vince Chambers — ATL at NY — Actual: ATL 85, NY 83
Level ATL range NY range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.2–93.1 85.0–89.5 1.23 pts — No
90% 88.6–92.7 85.3–89.1 0.48 pts — No
85% 88.9–92.5 85.6–88.9 — pts — No
80% 89.1–92.3 85.7–88.7 — pts — No
75% 89.2–92.1 85.9–88.5 — pts — No
Reg — ATL at NY — Actual: ATL 85, NY 83
Level ATL range NY range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.1–93.6 85.3–89.6 1.53 pts — No
90% 88.6–93.2 85.6–89.4 0.74 pts — No
85% 88.9–93.0 85.7–89.1 0.21 pts — No
80% 89.0–92.7 85.8–88.9 — pts — No
75% 89.2–92.2 86.0–88.6 — pts — No
Dr. Wallace — ATL at NY — Actual: ATL 85, NY 83
Level ATL range NY range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.3–92.6 84.7–89.3 0.99 pts — No
90% 88.6–92.2 85.1–88.9 0.28 pts — No
85% 88.9–92.0 85.3–88.7 — pts — No
80% 89.0–91.8 85.5–88.5 — pts — No
75% 89.2–91.7 85.7–88.3 — pts — No
Kevin — ATL at NY — Actual: ATL 85, NY 83
Level ATL range NY range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.3–93.1 85.4–89.2 0.88 pts — No
90% 88.7–92.7 85.6–88.9 0.24 pts — No
85% 89.0–92.5 85.8–88.6 — pts — No
80% 89.1–92.3 85.8–88.4 — pts — No
75% 89.3–92.1 86.0–88.3 — pts — No
Dr. Lila Shah — ATL at NY — Actual: ATL 85, NY 83
Level ATL range NY range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.1–93.4 84.6–89.4 1.31 pts — No
90% 88.5–93.0 84.9–88.2 — pts — No
85% 88.8–92.7 85.2–88.0 — pts — No
80% 89.0–92.5 85.5–87.8 — pts — No
75% 89.2–92.3 85.5–87.7 — pts — No
Ice — ATL at NY — Actual: ATL 85, NY 83
Level ATL range NY range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.7–92.7 85.3–90.2 2.56 pts — No
90% 88.1–92.3 85.5–89.0 0.95 pts — No
85% 88.3–92.0 85.7–88.8 0.46 pts — No
80% 88.5–91.8 85.7–88.5 — pts — No
75% 88.7–91.7 85.9–88.4 — pts — No
Jamal — ATL at NY — Actual: ATL 85, NY 83
Level ATL range NY range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.0–92.7 85.3–89.6 1.62 pts — No
90% 88.3–92.3 85.5–88.8 0.52 pts — No
85% 88.6–92.0 85.6–88.6 0.08 pts — No
80% 88.7–91.8 85.7–88.4 — pts — No
75% 88.9–91.7 85.8–88.1 — pts — No
Jordan — ATL at NY — Actual: ATL 85, NY 83
Level ATL range NY range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.1–93.0 85.1–89.6 1.49 pts — No
90% 88.5–92.6 85.5–88.8 0.3 pts — No
85% 88.8–92.4 85.6–88.6 — pts — No
80% 89.0–92.2 85.7–88.3 — pts — No
75% 89.1–92.0 85.8–88.2 — pts — No
Darren "Dimes" Lin — ATL at NY — Actual: ATL 85, NY 83
Level ATL range NY range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.8–93.0 84.6–89.6 1.76 pts — No
90% 88.2–92.6 85.0–89.2 0.93 pts — No
85% 88.5–92.3 85.2–88.9 0.4 pts — No
80% 88.7–92.1 85.4–88.7 — pts — No
75% 88.9–91.9 85.6–88.5 — pts — No
Maya Jefferson — ATL at NY — Actual: ATL 85, NY 83
Level ATL range NY range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.8–93.0 85.0–89.8 2.06 pts — No
90% 88.2–92.5 85.4–89.3 1.1 pts — No
85% 88.5–92.3 85.6–88.8 0.35 pts — No
80% 88.7–92.1 85.8–88.5 — pts — No
75% 88.8–91.9 86.0–88.3 — pts — No
Lexi — ATL at NY — Actual: ATL 85, NY 83
Level ATL range NY range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 88.4–93.0 85.2–89.3 0.95 pts — No
90% 88.7–92.4 85.4–89.1 0.41 pts — No
85% 89.0–92.0 85.5–88.7 — pts — No
80% 89.3–91.8 85.8–88.3 — pts — No
75% 89.4–91.6 85.9–88.0 — pts — No
Coach Sarah Watanabe — ATL at NY — Actual: ATL 85, NY 83
Level ATL range NY range Overlap Tol Warning Actual landed in range?
95% 87.6–92.3 84.9–89.3 1.71 pts — No
90% 88.0–91.9 85.2–88.8 0.9 pts — No
85% 88.2–91.7 85.5–88.6 0.4 pts — No
80% 88.4–91.5 85.6–88.4 0.02 pts — No
75% 88.5–91.3 85.8–88.3 — pts — No